Global Warming

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11786
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Global Warming

Post by Super Nova » Mon Feb 02, 2015 4:41 am

IQS.RLOW wrote:The warming in the top half of the ocean is not associated with the missing heat.
Do try to keep up and stop grasping at straws SN :roll:
What........

OK so you admit the ocean is warming. The top is warming and the bottom half is unchanged therefore the oceans are heating up.

is that correct?
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Global Warming

Post by IQS.RLOW » Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:34 am

Stop being disingenuous. You know the heat is still missing, you stupid fuckbag. :roll:

Where is your warming? It's not in the fucking oceans, so unless you know where it is, and you fucking don't, it is only your faith and zealotry blinding to you facts.

Face it SN, you are a religious zealot. Nothing more.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11786
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Global Warming

Post by Super Nova » Mon Feb 02, 2015 2:58 pm

IQ,

One thing at a time.

Do you agree with the scientific evidence that the oceans are increasing in energy and are warming?

Yes or No.... simple question to answer. then we will move on... one item at a time.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Global Warming

Post by Rorschach » Mon Feb 02, 2015 4:57 pm

Yet an increase or decrease in energy or temp of the orders of magnitude we have are not signs of any sort of cataclysm... natural or otherwise... what is your point?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11786
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Global Warming

Post by Super Nova » Mon Feb 02, 2015 5:06 pm

Rorschach wrote:Yet an increase or decrease in energy or temp of the orders of magnitude we have are not signs of any sort of cataclysm... natural or otherwise... what is your point?
My point is to break down the issue into it's component parts ... step 1.... do you agree with the science that shows the oceans are increasing in energy in the form of heat... yes or no.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Global Warming

Post by Rorschach » Mon Feb 02, 2015 5:34 pm

Oh break down the argument so it is no longer the argument... :roll: :roll: :roll:

The blue dog eats grass...
Is it a dog?
Is blue a colour?
Is grass green?

Oh yeah that works well.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Global Warming

Post by Neferti » Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:13 pm

Rorschach wrote:Oh break down the argument so it is no longer the argument... :roll: :roll: :roll:

The blue dog eats grass...
Is it a dog?
Is blue a colour?
Is grass green?

Oh yeah that works well.
:rofl :rofl

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11786
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Global Warming

Post by Super Nova » Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:55 pm

Super Nova wrote:
Rorschach wrote:Yet an increase or decrease in energy or temp of the orders of magnitude we have are not signs of any sort of cataclysm... natural or otherwise... what is your point?
My point is to break down the issue into it's component parts ... step 1.... do you agree with the science that shows the oceans are increasing in energy in the form of heat... yes or no.
It must be hard to provide an answer to this question.

In that lies the problem. Throwing accusation around left right and centre is not getting us anywhere.

You cannot answer a simple question and seek to always confuse the matter. When anything is raised that threatens your denialist position you refer to other denialist reports or those reports you think poo poo anything raised.

So... step 1... answer a simple question.

Step 2... next simple question.

Then we find the point of difference and can debate.

I am happy to wait.................
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Global Warming

Post by Rorschach » Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:25 pm

Rorschach wrote:Yet an increase or decrease in energy or temp of the orders of magnitude we have are not signs of any sort of cataclysm... natural or otherwise... what is your point?
Well closer to reality and the real issue is my much simpler question.
One you have as yet failed to answer... twice now. :roll: :roll: :roll:
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11786
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Global Warming

Post by Super Nova » Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:19 pm

Rorschach wrote:
Rorschach wrote:Yet an increase or decrease in energy or temp of the orders of magnitude we have are not signs of any sort of cataclysm... natural or otherwise... what is your point?
Well closer to reality and the real issue is my much simpler question.
One you have as yet failed to answer... twice now. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Are you saying that unchecked we can continue as we are infinitely without some sort of action will be without a cataclysmic affect?

I concede again there is no immediate cataclysm..... next 50 to 100 years or so.

So... let's discuss warming.

Are the oceans warming (y/n) [ ]

Place answer in box, stay within the box or your answer will not be read correctly by the automatic vote tallying system and could result in a score of zero. It is a binary answer....... take a guess. You have a 50% chance of being right.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 12 guests