Sometimes simple is best.

Telling the whole world, like they did today, that they pulled out of firing their missiles because the target ran into a township is exactly like discussing "operational matters" in their woar on boats. It's telling them what they have to do to avoid being targeted. Only difference is that discussing one is good for the polls, discussing the other is bad for the polls... oh, and one lot of arseholes actually have the capacity to shoot backIQS.RLOW wrote:Revealing operational matters on boats would result in smugglers trying to circumnavigate around measures put in place.
Revealing that we are sending jets over Iraq (along with a number of other countries) is obviously not an issue to the operational commanders of the force in Iraq.
It's not fucking rocket science, but I suppose the handwringing bedwetters are running out of sook material.
So border protection has been firing on illegal boats have they?oh, and one lot of arseholes actually have the capacity to shoot back
I can see your point, but it is a tad fragile. You see they already know to run and hide in populated civilian areas. Hamas launch rockets from them this mob will also take the cowards line.boxy wrote:Telling the whole world, like they did today, that they pulled out of firing their missiles because the target ran into a township is exactly like discussing "operational matters" in their woar on boats. It's telling them what they have to do to avoid being targeted. Only difference is that discussing one is good for the polls, discussing the other is bad for the polls... oh, and one lot of arseholes actually have the capacity to shoot backIQS.RLOW wrote:Revealing operational matters on boats would result in smugglers trying to circumnavigate around measures put in place.
Revealing that we are sending jets over Iraq (along with a number of other countries) is obviously not an issue to the operational commanders of the force in Iraq.
It's not fucking rocket science, but I suppose the handwringing bedwetters are running out of sook material.
I very much doubt that the MSM knows what is going on. As I understand it, the people involved only know at the LAST MINUTE ..... so ..........?boxy wrote:Telling the whole world, like they did today, that they pulled out of firing their missiles because the target ran into a township is exactly like discussing "operational matters" in their woar on boats. It's telling them what they have to do to avoid being targeted. Only difference is that discussing one is good for the polls, discussing the other is bad for the polls... oh, and one lot of arseholes actually have the capacity to shoot backIQS.RLOW wrote:Revealing operational matters on boats would result in smugglers trying to circumnavigate around measures put in place.
Revealing that we are sending jets over Iraq (along with a number of other countries) is obviously not an issue to the operational commanders of the force in Iraq.
It's not fucking rocket science, but I suppose the handwringing bedwetters are running out of sook material.
Rorschach wrote:I can see your point, but it is a tad fragile. You see they already know to run and hide in populated civilian areas. Hamas launch rockets from them this mob will also take the cowards line.boxy wrote:Telling the whole world, like they did today, that they pulled out of firing their missiles because the target ran into a township is exactly like discussing "operational matters" in their woar on boats. It's telling them what they have to do to avoid being targeted. Only difference is that discussing one is good for the polls, discussing the other is bad for the polls... oh, and one lot of arseholes actually have the capacity to shoot backIQS.RLOW wrote:Revealing operational matters on boats would result in smugglers trying to circumnavigate around measures put in place.
Revealing that we are sending jets over Iraq (along with a number of other countries) is obviously not an issue to the operational commanders of the force in Iraq.
It's not fucking rocket science, but I suppose the handwringing bedwetters are running out of sook material.
No....we were not as obvious a specific target as we are now we are up in their skies, ready to maim and dismember them and their wives and kids. Sure, I note you careful use of the word 'people.' True.....now they know we have declared War.....oops.....no that's not right. Those bombs are humanitarian. And when you answer, tell me why they need our 6/8 planes and 200 SAS. That is mere, pissy token at best. A church mouse fart in a cyclone. It is Abbott's cyncical dog whistle for votes. Tell me why I am wrong.We were already targets...
You don't think the "Arabs" know people are up their ready to "bomb" them? Useless..
So, you have not responded to the challenge. Tell me where I was wrong.......don't tell me how Abbott, the Evil Mastermind of the West garnered all their resources to fight ISIL.....he alone 'managed' all that and then sent a tom thumb over as our contribution. Yay!IQS.RLOW wrote:Because you are always wrong.
I suppose Abbott managed to get all the other nations involved just so he could prove you lefty retards correct about your paranoid fucktarded thought processes.![]()
Seriously, you leftys are completely retarded if you think this is about poll numbers.
The facts are is that Australia has the highest proportion of foreign fighters in the IS compared to other nations.
Anything for a good conspiracy theory. Why not throw the debil Murdoch in there as well and complete your elevation to complete dickhead
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 85 guests