Open discussion

[Aussie]

NOBODY but the Admin and Mods can see who is reading what Forum or getting PMs. You, Mantra, George and the rest of you are paranoid. Mantra whined and it was changed to Tom Toms.

Wrong. The last PM you sent at OzPol was Sep 29th, 2014 at 7:20pm. It is easy to work out with a bit of intuition, who responded and when.

[Rorschach]

"On the Tom Toms" is fine with me. Why would anyone want to see who is browsing which forum or, more to the point, who is typing or reading a PM anyway? That in itself was more kindergarten than just taking away the option.

Well since I used to work odd hours and i used it to see if anyone was on and if it was worth looking for new posts.
It's handy if you want to talk to someone in particular and not wait a day for a reply.

For once I agree with the wet blanket.

You have a funny way of making friends monk... could explain a lot don't you think...

[Neferti]

Point about all this is—get rid of that idiotic “on the tom toms” and make your mark as Admin.

Get rid of AiA as mod and be your own man.

Simplify the forum structure and the board will look busier than with too many forums some of which like Tech should be visible to guests, no need to hide which I why I suggested moving the Tech threads to OT and ditching the Tech forum.

Simplify! Make your mark! Be your own man!

Don't you have a Lefty and some food thread to attend to over ............>>>>>>

[Rorschach]

NOBODY but the Admin and Mods can see who is reading what Forum or getting PMs. You, Mantra, George and the rest of you are paranoid. Mantra whined and it was changed to Tom Toms.

Wrong. The last PM you sent at OzPol was Sep 29th, 2014 at 7:20pm. It is easy to work out with a bit of intuition, who responded and when.

But why would anyone (sane) bother?

[IQS.RLOW]

NOBODY but the Admin and Mods can see who is reading what Forum or getting PMs. You, Mantra, George and the rest of you are paranoid. Mantra whined and it was changed to Tom Toms.

Wrong. The last PM you sent at OzPol was Sep 29th, 2014 at 7:20pm. It is easy to work out with a bit of intuition, who responded and when.

But why would anyone (sane) bother?

Because apparently it is "oh so clevah"

[Aussie]

NOBODY but the Admin and Mods can see who is reading what Forum or getting PMs. You, Mantra, George and the rest of you are paranoid. Mantra whined and it was changed to Tom Toms.

Wrong. The last PM you sent at OzPol was Sep 29th, 2014 at 7:20pm. It is easy to work out with a bit of intuition, who responded and when.

But why would anyone (sane) bother?

Maybe.......apart from it being 'oh so clavah' ~ to take the jolly piss out of wankers who have no idea what they are so afraid of.

[Black Orchid]

NOBODY but the Admin and Mods can see who is reading what Forum or getting PMs. You, Mantra, George and the rest of you are paranoid. Mantra whined and it was changed to Tom Toms.

Wrong. The last PM you sent at OzPol was Sep 29th, 2014 at 7:20pm. It is easy to work out with a bit of intuition, who responded and when.

You have the intuition of an amoeba and prove it constantly. You are a stalker plain and simple.

[IQS.RLOW]

...or show everyone else what an unbalanced fuckwit you are who is incapable of rational debate and concentrates on the personal stalking rather than discussion of the topic?

Much closer to the truth - because it really isn't "oh so clevah"

[Rorschach]

Wrong. The last PM you sent at OzPol was Sep 29th, 2014 at 7:20pm. It is easy to work out with a bit of intuition, who responded and when.

But why would anyone (sane) bother?

Maybe.......apart from it being 'oh so clavah' ~ to take the jolly piss out of wankers who have no idea what they are so afraid of.

BO is right you are a total wanker... did it ever cross your tiny brain that some PMs don't require a response? Immediate or otherwise?
I can see you now drooling whilst waiting for a non existent reply
You keep patting yourself on the back and looking like a fool... that's fine by me.

[Aussie]

Good. Shut up.