Muslims are savages *warning- shocking pics inside*

[Black Orchid]

We should give them a Caliphate.
Deport them all.
Wall them all in.
Let them kill each other off.
End of discussion.

I have been saying that for years.

These leaflets are being handed out in London.

[Aussie]

Another thing you have in common with IQ ^^^^^^^^^.

[Black Orchid]

Another thing you have in common with IQ ^^^^^^^^^.

Can one of the Mods here please delete all aussie's OFF TOPIC, nit picking, trolling posts?

[5.56 NATO]

Go over and meet these bastards Aussie ,they would welcome you with open pocket knives. You wouldn't know a muslim if they shoved one up your arse, spineless leftist apologist for the most destructive dangerous cancer in society..islam.

[Outlaw Yogi]

Thank you Islamic State for showing the world true Islam, as lived by Muhammad the goat fucker.
Thank you Muslims in Sydney for wearing T-shirts with the Islamic State logo while protesting, thus showing where your loyalties sit.
Thank you to the 67 Muslim orgs in Australia who signed the petition complaining that the govt is dividing Muslims into moderates and extremists,
so that it is fair and appropriate to tar all Muslims with the same brush.
And thank you apologists for Islam for illustrating your lack of judgement, and thus not have a valid opinion.

For anyone claiming this head chopping business is out of the ordinary for Muslims, I would like to correct your ignorance.
I saw photographs in the early 90s of TNI (Indonesian soldiers - typically Sunni Muslims from Java) members with west Papuan heads on their bayonets.
In Saudi Arabia (also Sunni Muslim) they have "Chop chop square" beside the main gaol/jail.
If your cell faces it, you can watch the executions, decapitation with a sword.

NB: the little girl in the pic initiating this thread was not beheaded with a sharp sword.
Her head was hacked off with a blunt knife, and would have takes several minutes to do.

These Sharouf and Endomar characters are Lebos from Bankstown.
In the early 90s I moved from the Sutherland Shire to Condell Park/Bankstown to be near my business for security reasons and to avoid traffic to and from work.
The local rag kept going on about an illegal mosque. They had bought 2 houses, demoshid 1 for a car par and used the other as a mosque.
I went to see what the fuss was about. While walking in this short culdesac street, I swa a Vietnames bloke put something in his car boot in his front yard.
As I got closer to the rail line at end of street, 3 Lebos in a white van going in opposite direction gave me the death stare.

When I got to the end of the street I let my dog sniff and urinate near the rail line. The 3 Lebs in the van returned.
Driver asked "What are you doing?"
I replied "Walking my dog, what are you doing?"
Driver said "This is our street"
I replied"No, this is my country"
Driver Answered"Yes, now leave"
I replied "No, you leave"
My sheperd X cattle dog stood up on hind legs putting front paws on drivers window sill and stuck his head through the window.
The driver backed away, they mumbled something in woganese and drove away.

This was the point I knew there was no room in Australia for Muslims.
Turns out that illegal mosque is the Al Rizalah payer centre where Sharouf and Endomar got their Islamic indoctrination.

[Rorschach]

Why we need the Middle East to help fight Islamic State
Date September 2, 2014
Peter Hartcher
Sydney Morning Herald political and international editor

We've found the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. It's taken a decade and they're not the ones we were told to expect. But these ones are real.

The evidence of the WMDs advertised by the Bush, Blair and Howard regimes in 2003 was so elusive as to be invisible. The evidence this time is so overwhelming as to be irrepressible.

As Tony Abbott told the Parliament on Monday: "Many Australians, understandably, will shrink from reaching out to this conflict on the other side of the world, but this conflict is reaching out to us."

According to Australia's spy agencies, some 60 Australians have taken up arms to join ISIS. They are supported by about 100 more who still live in Australia. But the bigger, grander struggle is a contest between barbarism and civilisation.

It's essential that the struggle is joined, and Australia is right to join it. Australia is right to join the humanitarian relief effort to help those under siege. Under US leadership, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy are also active.

And Australia is right to join the military effort to stop the barbarians who claim to represent an Islamic State. So far it is helping arm the Kurds and other "non-ISIS" forces.

But this is going to be much bigger, more complex and more dangerous than any Australian official has even begun to articulate.

The genocide and war in Bosnia in 1992-95 was "a problem from purgatory," says the US special envoy to that crisis, Chris Hill, whereas the fight in Iraq and Syria today is "the problem from hell". The Iraq crisis is another with which Hill is intimate; he was the US ambassador to Iraq in 2009-10.

Why is it so diabolical?

The first problem: Australia and allies have just stepped into a raging, ancient sectarian war. It's a civil war between the two main churches of Islam, the Shiite and the Sunni. And we have taken sides.

The ISIS fighters are partly a product of Sunni rage and frustration. And it was a rage and frustration set off by the US-British-Australian invasion in 2003: "We didn't understand in 2003 the extreme antipathy of the Sunni Arabs to a Shiite government in Iraq.

"When you flip a country from being Sunni-led for several centuries to being [Shiite-led], don't be surprised when the Sunnis don't accept it."

It didn't have to be that way after the invasion. But the US-endorsed prime minister of Iraq, Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, ran a vengeful sectarian government that persecuted the Sunni population.

It was part of Hill's job to try to persuade him otherwise: "The number of times I had to go to Maliki to ask him to pay off the Sunni militias – he always told me 'the cheque's in the mail.'" Hill didn't warm to him: "To know Maliki is to dislike him."

"So when the US left, the Sunnis decided it was time to put Iraq in its rightful order."

Sunni rage and frustration didn't merely flow spontaneously from Sunni streets and villages. It was fed and fuelled by wealthy groups in the region's Sunni powerhouse, Saudi Arabia. As Hill puts it: "The [Islamic State] movement got started with financial flows from NGOs in Saudi Arabia."

This is central to understanding why it's wrong to think that the US-led coalition can simply drop bombs on Islamic State (formerly known as ISIL or ISIS) and consider the problem solved.

For the West to attack Islamic State, a Sunni-based movement, in defence of a Shiite-led government, in Baghdad, is fraught with unintended consequences.

It could inflame the very schism that is at the centre of this problem. And that could further agitate the Muslim communities in Australia, Indonesia and elsewhere.

Hill's suggestion? "I would start with the Saudis and the Sunni Arab world." It's vital to bring the key Middle East nations to the effort to get at the nub of the problem without merely inflaming it. It helps that Maliki is now gone. His successor, al-Abadi, has yet to prove himself capable of uniting Iraqis.

If mere bombs were enough to pacify and stabilise a country, there would not be a problem in Iraq today. The US Secretary of State, John Kerry, says he will travel to the Middle East next week in search of support from regional governments for the broader effort.

In short, lethal force is necessary but insufficient.

The second problem: To whom does the Western coalition lend force? The Kurdish Peshmerga, certainly. Western governments speak of moderate forces. But who else? "Who are these elusive moderates we're giving arms to, and how do we know they'll still be moderate next week?" Hill poses, a question without a convincing answer.

This leads to the third problem, or what Chris Hill calls "the real issue", ultimately, "we will have bombed ISIS out of Iraq and it will cross the border back into Syria. Then what?"

Barack Obama long ago declared that the regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria had to surrender power; Assad has fought like a tiger ever since to hold it. Some 200,000 people have died.

How does the West deal with Assad? His great-power sponsor, Russia, is busy invading Ukraine. The West is trying to restrain him. It is in no position to ask for his help in Syria.

As Obama himself admitted last week, the US has no strategy for this inevitability. It needs to develop one with the major powers of the region. That will be much harder than dropping bombs.

"You have the same problem" that the US and the West has suffered before, warns Hill: "Arrogance. You can't take a 1000-year-old problem and try and solve it in a few months."

Peter Hartcher is the international editor.

Well I see it in a less personal and emotive sense than that. It isn't arrogance more like stupidity. We have a problem and it is Islam whether or not people want to acknowledge that. We will be like the little dutch boy only putting may fingers in many leaks in the dyke. Islam remains the problem and will until it reforms itself.

Personally I'm still in favour of a great big wall.



Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/why-we-ne ... z3C6gzk3eS" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Black Orchid]

Dropping bombs, or supplying arms, will not solve the problem. We cannot, in any way, hope to solve any problems for these barbarians, who have been going at it for 1,000 years.

It is inevitable that acts of terror will be witnessed on our own soil in the near future. Leave them over there and leave them to whatever it is they do best .. to each other.

[lisa jones]

Islam is a religion that needs to be outlawed along with leftism and environmentalists.

We need to shut down all Islamic migration and arrest and deport all the Sydney violent muzzies. Round them up and shoot them if we have to. This is a war that they want and they know the West will be undermined by the spineless left. So be it- round the leftist up with them and see how they like being interred with their little darlings.


They are beheading children.

Not according to Annie Anthrax. They're apparently awesome people. And physical abuse of their own children and wives is ok too. So long as it's done in accordance with the terms of the verses in the Koran. Just ask her. She'll set you straight on the matter.

[Outlaw Yogi]

Muslims are a menace. Kill them all.

[Grendel]

Muslims are a menace. Kill them all.

Diggety dooo!