Gillard should face jury: Top criminal lawyer

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Gillard should face jury: Top criminal lawyer

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sat Aug 09, 2014 12:29 pm

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/fe ... 7018506482" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
A FORMER top criminal defence lawyer has reviewed reams of evidence about the AWU slush fund scandal at the ongoing Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption, resulting in his legal opinion that Julia Gillard has problems best resolved by a jury.

Russell Hanson QC, who helped run several royal commission-style probes before his retirement, based his detailed review on sworn witness statements and oral testimony at the commission, as well as key documents including Gillard’s exit interview from the law firm Slater & Gordon in 1995.

His findings are in stark contrast to those by former Labor leader Mark Latham, who has no legal training but who has used his column in The Australian Financial Review to criticise the anti-corruption commission, ridicule Victoria Police and lampoon the evidence of key witnesses.

Latham wrote in the AFR that three witnesses with evidence adverse to Gillard were like “ageing Oompa Loompas”, adding that a smear campaign with no substance had been run by The Australian to tarnish the former PM.

Hanson’s review dismisses Latham as an “apologist”. Hanson says: “I am of the view that there has been sufficient evidence given, in a form admissible in a criminal trial, to entitle a jury to find criminal conduct on the part of (former Australian Workers Union boss Bruce) Wilson and (former AWU official Ralph) Blewitt.

“In Gillard’s case, I come to the same conclusion based on the evidence given, supplemented by evidence in the public arena, namely her own public statements.

“The evidence is overwhelming that the Workplace Reform Association (slush fund) was a sham from start to finish.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11791
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Gillard should face jury: Top criminal lawyer

Post by Super Nova » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:28 pm

“The evidence is overwhelming that the Workplace Reform Association (slush fund) was a sham from start to finish.
I wonder if our resident legal authority has an opinion on this legal matter.

In the real world
Image

On the internet in an unreal world
Image
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25831
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Gillard should face jury: Top criminal lawyer

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:22 pm

Gillard should face a jury and the sooner the better. Latham should never again see the light of day. The man's cra cra.

Aussie

Re: Gillard should face jury: Top criminal lawyer

Post by Aussie » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:26 pm

Super Nova wrote:
“The evidence is overwhelming that the Workplace Reform Association (slush fund) was a sham from start to finish.
I wonder if our resident legal authority has an opinion on this legal matter.

In the real world
Image

On the internet in an unreal world
Image
You want my view.....go read Ozpol.

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25831
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Gillard should face jury: Top criminal lawyer

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:53 pm

Please post on topic or not at all. Thank you :lol:

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Gillard should face jury: Top criminal lawyer

Post by Neferti » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:56 pm

OFF TOPIC

NOBODY is really interested in what you have to say over at OzPol, aussie.

I have never seen you post anything "political" on this Forum, apart from the smartarse one liners here and there, abusing other posters. You want to run this joint? Get Real!

Aussie

Re: Gillard should face jury: Top criminal lawyer

Post by Aussie » Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:07 pm

Black Orchid wrote:Please post on topic or not at all. Thank you :lol:
What a joke. You call this a 'post on topic,' or just a useless choir school girl chant?
Gillard should face a jury and the sooner the better. Latham should never again see the light of day. The man's cra cra.
Even the OP is just a cut 'n paste!

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25831
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Gillard should face jury: Top criminal lawyer

Post by Black Orchid » Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:09 pm

Aussie wrote:
Black Orchid wrote:Please post on topic or not at all. Thank you :lol:
What a joke. You call this a 'post on topic,' or just a useless choir school girl chant?
Gillard should face a jury and the sooner the better. Latham should never again see the light of day. The man's cra cra.
Yes, i certainly call it a post that is ON TOPIC :Hi

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Gillard should face jury: Top criminal lawyer

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:38 pm

Aussie wrote:
Black Orchid wrote:Please post on topic or not at all. Thank you :lol:
What a joke. You call this a 'post on topic,' or just a useless choir school girl chant?
Gillard should face a jury and the sooner the better. Latham should never again see the light of day. The man's cra cra.
Even the OP is just a cut 'n paste!
:roll: Get the everliving fuck outta my thread, you fucking douche. We already know what your opinion on this and every other lefty douche who kiddy fiddles or thieves- you defend them because you too, are a kiddy fiddling, thieving lefty douche.

Do not comment on my threads, do not enter them, do not respond in them. If anyone publicly asks for your stupid fucking shit dribble pretending to be an opinion in one of my threads, send them a PM and stay the fuck out, fluffy bunny.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Aussie

Re: Gillard should face jury: Top criminal lawyer

Post by Aussie » Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:40 pm

IQS.RLOW wrote:
Aussie wrote:
Black Orchid wrote:Please post on topic or not at all. Thank you :lol:
What a joke. You call this a 'post on topic,' or just a useless choir school girl chant?
Gillard should face a jury and the sooner the better. Latham should never again see the light of day. The man's cra cra.
Even the OP is just a cut 'n paste!
:roll: Get the everliving fuck outta my thread, you fucking douche. We already know what your opinion on this and every other lefty douche who kiddy fiddles or thieves- you defend them because you too, are a kiddy fiddling, thieving lefty douche.

Do not comment on my threads, do not enter them, do not respond in them. If anyone publicly asks for your stupid fucking shit dribble pretending to be an opinion in one of my threads, send them a PM and stay the fuck out, Chinese Student.
Right is good, left is bad, right is good, left is bad, right is good, left is bad.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests