Political correctness or stupidity?

[IQS.RLOW]

Boxy= another luvvie in denial
The luvvie media is notorious for leaving out racial or ethnic profiles when reporting on the bad guys.

Take the ABC as a prime example. Not long after the two islamofags tried to cut of the head of the guy in London, one of the ABC.

The Islamofag was caught on camera at the scene stating
“We swear by almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you. You people will never be safe,” Islamic covert Adeboloja said, his blood-soaked hands providing dramatic emphasis. “There are many, many ayah throughout the Koran that we must fight them as they fight us, an eye for an eye, a tooth for tooth.”

Here's a response from an ABC staffer as to why they were ignoring the islamofag aspect of the killers...
“Where is your primary and official source that these crimes were carried out in the name of Islam as you are happy to tell your listeners?”

Pull the other one, luvvieboy. It plays jingle bells...

[boxy]

Would you like to refute the facts in the case? They are, that despite what you tea party types would like to believe, the NSW police do use ethnic descriptors where appropriate, and that all the media (even the right wing rags where you usually get your propaganda) are using the same description given to them by the police, who are in a much better position (than a bunch of racist internet trolls) to know who they're looking for, and what the best description would be to get them the information they need to break the case.

Hate on, crazy motherfuckers

[Rorschach]

Looks to me like Poxy is trying to take on Arsie's mantle.

[Chard]

Here in the States, the word "retarded" is on its way to becoming the new "n-i-g-g-e-r."

Whenever someone gets upset you said "retard" just ask them if "mongoliod", "waterhead", or "God's Little Mulligan" are acceptable alternatives. When they get irate about that use the distraction to punch the offended party in the junk and walk away.

[Black Orchid]

The original description has been revised from;

Police say the man they are looking for is of Middle Eastern or Mediterranean appearance, 20-30 years old, about 165 centimetres tall and chubby.

He was wearing a dark shirt with a black hooded jacket and blue shorts with white stripes.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/two-young-gir ... 30jyf.html

Notice that it includes Mediterranean, as well as Middle-eastern, and says he is "chubby".

He said police were looking for a man described as having black hair, a thin build and wearing a black jacket with a white stripe down the side, and blue shorts.

Read more: http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/new ... 6798629218

The latest description (possibly using more witness statements or CCTV evidence) has revised not only the racial descriptors, but also now describes him as being "thin". The stripe has also moved from the short to the jacket. Witnesses aren't all that reliable, especially if you rely on a single individual who is remembering something that they didn't realise was going to be important at the time they saw it.

Who knows which is a better descriptor? Would be a pity to discourage witness from coming forward because the person they saw in the area didn't look "middle eastern" to them.

You do realise that the park was full of Muslims 'of middle eastern appearance'?

It was these people who described the suspect to police

[boxy]

The original description has been revised from;

Police say the man they are looking for is of Middle Eastern or Mediterranean appearance, 20-30 years old, about 165 centimetres tall and chubby.

He was wearing a dark shirt with a black hooded jacket and blue shorts with white stripes.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/two-young-gir ... 30jyf.html

Notice that it includes Mediterranean, as well as Middle-eastern, and says he is "chubby".

He said police were looking for a man described as having black hair, a thin build and wearing a black jacket with a white stripe down the side, and blue shorts.

Read more: http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/new ... 6798629218

The latest description (possibly using more witness statements or CCTV evidence) has revised not only the racial descriptors, but also now describes him as being "thin". The stripe has also moved from the short to the jacket. Witnesses aren't all that reliable, especially if you rely on a single individual who is remembering something that they didn't realise was going to be important at the time they saw it.

Who knows which is a better descriptor? Would be a pity to discourage witness from coming forward because the person they saw in the area didn't look "middle eastern" to them.

You do realise that the park was full of Muslims 'of middle eastern appearance'?

It was these people who described the suspect to police

What's your point?

The cops changed their description, despite it being well documented here that they have no problem with racial descriptors... that's the point I was making.

[Black Orchid]

The police (on occasion) don't have a problem with racial descriptors but that lasts all of 24 hours in the media before the descriptions are changed to appease people like you who seem to want to protect the perpetrator more than the victims.

Pathetic!

[boxy]

The facts seem to contradict your paranoia... but, please, don't let that stop you... it's all you've got

[Black Orchid]

The facts seem to contradict your paranoia... but, please, don't let that stop you... it's all you've got

Paranoia? You really are quite weird.

I was referring to the lack of ethnic descriptors in media reports (not the polices' most wanted list) and I have seen nothing posted here that changes the facts.

But do carry on with your usual vitriol.

[boxy]

Ever wondered why all the news services (even from competing networks) have exactly the same description, BO? No... I don't expect you question things at all