Anti Bikie Laws

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Anti Bikie Laws

Post by Rorschach » Thu Nov 28, 2013 5:48 pm

No matey I'm not fixated on anything.
If you want to be a criminal... then go to gaol. I don't need you in my society.
If people want to flaunt their criminality they deserve what they get, it is long past time they were rounded up and thrown in gaol.
If they want to be members of a Bike club then let them but this OUTLAW idiocy is just that. Time they grew up.
As for Rorschach... so happens Watchmen was on when I joined you flea. I have no problems with you running around carrying a dead pig, playing Crocodile Dundee or wearing a mask and purple tights... so don't try any stupid crap on with me.
In case you missed it my avatar is a Cockroach... unbelievable :roll: :roll: :roll:
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Chard
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 3:05 pm
Location: Mein Führer! I can walk!

Re: Anti Bikie Laws

Post by Chard » Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:42 am

i'm loving that you pussies apperently think there needs to be a task force to take out a group of people who are largely made up of middle aged men in mid-life crisis mode. "Bikies" (seriously? Bikies? Are you people like three years old or some shit?) cause less than 1% of violent crimes annually in Australia. This is just song and dance bullshit put on by your Government to distract you from just how shitty things are in areas that actually matter.

But hey, "Bikies"... You pussies.
Deterrence is the art of producing in the mind of the enemy the FEAR to attack. - Dr. Strangelove

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Anti Bikie Laws

Post by Rorschach » Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:34 pm

Chard wrote:i'm loving that you pussies apperently think there needs to be a task force to take out a group of people who are largely made up of middle aged men in mid-life crisis mode. "Bikies" (seriously? Bikies? Are you people like three years old or some shit?) cause less than 1% of violent crimes annually in Australia. This is just song and dance bullshit put on by your Government to distract you from just how shitty things are in areas that actually matter.

But hey, "Bikies"... You pussies.
Wow you know so much about Australia don't you. :du :du :du NOT!
We have Bikie gangs that don't even ride bikes ya moron and they aren't all middle aged and many Bikie gangs are now ethnic based... for years they've been recruiting the young and violent into their ranks, and they are taking over the criminal activities big time. No conspiracy there ya mug. :du
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Plough
Posts: 364
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 8:56 pm

Re: Anti Bikie Laws

Post by Plough » Tue Dec 03, 2013 2:52 pm

Well it seems to me these new laws are punishing the innocent as much if not more than their intended targets. From what I can see the government had ample laws in place to attack and convict these gangs without the need to go as far as they have. If you are a criminal you should be punished for your criminal activity, not for whom you associate with. Freedom of association is one of the things that makes living in the so called civilised western world so good.

The unintended (and I say this hoping they were unintended) consequences of these anti association laws are to much to make them worth having.

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Anti Bikie Laws

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:37 pm

Spot on Plogh. Newspapers are now full of stories about cops picking on people who ride bikes but have no connection whatsoever with criminal elements.

Bundy's News-Mail has run stories about cops taking the register (names and addresses) of people involved in charity toy runs.
That is toys donated to sick kids ect.

The Australian has run a few too. The last I saw was about a member of 'Patriots' (a club for military personel) being strip searched on his front lawn at two in the morning, despite showing his ADF ID card and the Patriots public condemnation of criminal orgs, soley because he rides a bike.

I agree with you Chard, Rawsack and those like him are pussies. Although I was beginning to wonder if he's really a school girl in a tie mymicing a gay New York Jew they saw on telly.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Anti Bikie Laws

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:39 pm

The problem with small minded ignorance regarding crime, criminality, and/or organised crime syndicates from the
likes of Rawsack, is frightened little wimps who've led such sheltered lives fail to understand crime is a nescessity
for governments so they can impose tax penalties upon it in the form of fines and forced aquisition of assets. That's
why governments invent new crimes and new deffinitions concerning them.

Dwelling within such sheltered bubbles allows such sheeple to ignore anthropogenic realities in the name of social
responsibility so they don't have to recognise or deal with their own hypocrisies. And cry victim loudest when
governments create new prohibitions for revenue raising if the population becomes too compliant.

A car thief and insurance scammer from Mt perry complaining his autographed AC/DC poster was pilfered when his house
was burgled, said to me "We need the Police, otherwise old grannies would get bashed" (and Mantra once wrote the same
or similar insinuation). To which I replied "No, these things happen anyway, regardless of police, and in fact happen
more because of police, due vto criminals now having human rights. If we had no police there would be far fewer
criminals because the public lynch mobs would deal with it themselves. Like they did before Posse Commitas was
abolished and replaced by police forces".

Before the invention of Police forces in the Victorian era, most westernised nations used the Saxon law 'Posse Commitas'.
Which obliged the community to form a posse, apprehend the law breaker and deliver them to a magistrate or judge for
trial. When governments realised they could financially benefit from crime rather than it costing currency and resources,
police forces became a universal institution.

Human social evolution made police forces inevitable, but the human failings of zenophobia and malice induces fear and
demonisation of the other, so victimization and corruption incites retalition by any means, and those who dare retaliate
are deemed criminal. The result is authority generates criminality.

Malicious and corrupt beligerance by authorities causes anti authoritarian sub cultures, which affords genuinely habitual
criminals and anti social delinquents alike an outcast status to identify with, and in turn allows them to become folk
heros. So in effect, outlaws from Ned kelly and Ben Hall to the Hell's Angels and Comanchero are a direct retalitory
result of government authorities arbitary powers and desire for totalitarian control.

Personally I suspect Rawsack wouldn't know $#!+ from clay about organised crime if I rubbed his nose in it. Because he is
what I call a partisan zombie, which exhibits a similar but opposing brand loyalty as a rusted on robot. A rusted on robot
is unable to break their programing, so mymics an answering machine. A partisan zombie is the perfect slave because no
restraints are required and no matter how much they are mistreated, they will never defy their master.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Anti Bikie Laws

Post by Rorschach » Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:30 pm

Image
I usually reserve this for the likes of Aussie who uses stupid names and tells me what I think and what I believe etc.. and has no clue about me personally or my life.
But hey.... never let it be said I'm biased about it..
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Anti Bikie Laws

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:22 pm

But I do know you, or rather your character. You're exactly the same as Aussie and JM, a hypocrite.

Spoze that's why you posted a pic of yourself implying it's someone else.
Just out of curiosity, how did you get your body so flexible you can jam your head up your date, when your head is as rigid as a sheet of marine ply?
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Anti Bikie Laws

Post by Rorschach » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:36 pm

Big words... got no proof though eh... just lazy name calling because I disagree with you. :roll:
You wouldn't know me if you tripped over me in the bush.
Personally I expected better from you Yogi.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Anti Bikie Laws

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:59 pm

Rorschach wrote:Big words... got no proof though eh... just lazy name calling because I disagree with you. :roll:
You wouldn't know me if you tripped over me in the bush.
Personally I expected better from you Yogi.
Don't need proof, I'm old enough to have what is known as 'pattern recognition'.
Hopefully you're still young enough to one day wise up, where as Aussie and JM have grown old and stayed stupid.
I was young and naive too once, just like you are. Now I'm cynical and contemptuous.

See you are a hypocrite, just like I stated. Claiming I'm name calling because I disagree with you, when in fact I'm name calling because I have lost respect for you, and you are arguing for the sake of arguing because I refered to you as a phuken idiot and you've got your feelings hurt.

Tell you how it is mate. I don't care if you're left, right or on moon base alpha. I will agree or disagree with statements regardless of who makes them, based soley on merit of said statement alone.
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests