This folder contains Archived threads.
-
Super Nova
- Posts: 11787
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Post
by Super Nova » Mon Sep 23, 2013 6:23 pm
Rorschach wrote:True.... I was waiting for the last minute rush
Oh and official word on how to vote so that my vote wouldn't be invalid
Missread your statement, sorry.
how to vote.
You vote in order of preference.
It has always been the case that you don't have the full number of candidates listed for the vote to be valid.
So you can vote for 1, 2 or 3 candidates in your order of preference.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
-
Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Post
by Rorschach » Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:05 pm
Optional preferential then... be nice if the constitution was as concise.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
-
Super Nova
- Posts: 11787
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Post
by Super Nova » Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:07 pm
Rorschach wrote:Optional preferential then... be nice if the constitution was as concise.
It would be but it is not so we rely on precedent as it the norm under common law.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
-
Aussie
Post
by Aussie » Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:24 pm
Super Nova wrote:Rorschach wrote:Optional preferential then... be nice if the constitution was as concise.
It would be but it is not so we rely on precedent as it the norm under common law.
You only rely on those which suit the outcomes you want SN. That is simply unprincipled.
-
Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Post
by Rorschach » Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:30 pm
Precedent in which the Constitution states MAY be followed... precedent only means something has happened before... not that it should have or will ever happen again.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:35 pm
Aussie wrote:Super Nova wrote:Rorschach wrote:Optional preferential then... be nice if the constitution was as concise.
It would be but it is not so we rely on precedent as it the norm under common law.
You only rely on those which suit the outcomes you want SN. That is simply unprincipled.
And you use the ambiguity to abuse, threaten and try to entrench yourself.
You are scum of the lowest order.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
Super Nova
- Posts: 11787
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Post
by Super Nova » Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:39 pm
Rorschach wrote:Precedent in which the Constitution states MAY be followed... precedent only means something has happened before... not that it should have or will ever happen again.
I understand they and have stated this before in a long argument over precedent.
If we have a clear winner, count back is not required. Your vote will be valid as every election has to date has this feature in the voting patterns.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
-
Aussie
Post
by Aussie » Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:47 pm
Super Nova wrote:Rorschach wrote:Precedent in which the Constitution states MAY be followed... precedent only means something has happened before... not that it should have or will ever happen again.
I understand they and have stated this before in a long argument over precedent.
If we have a clear winner, count back is not required. Your vote will be valid as every election has to date has this feature in the voting patterns.
It also had the feature that votes can be changed, and there is every prospect some will change. Keep your powder dry at all times, SN.
-
Super Nova
- Posts: 11787
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Post
by Super Nova » Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:51 pm
Aussie wrote:Super Nova wrote:Rorschach wrote:Precedent in which the Constitution states MAY be followed... precedent only means something has happened before... not that it should have or will ever happen again.
I understand they and have stated this before in a long argument over precedent.
If we have a clear winner, count back is not required. Your vote will be valid as every election has to date has this feature in the voting patterns.
It also had the feature that votes can be changed, and there is every prospect some will change. Keep your powder dry at all times, SN.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
-
Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Post
by Rorschach » Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:58 pm
Aussie wrote:Super Nova wrote:Rorschach wrote:Precedent in which the Constitution states MAY be followed... precedent only means something has happened before... not that it should have or will ever happen again.
I understand they and have stated this before in a long argument over precedent.
If we have a clear winner, count back is not required. Your vote will be valid as every election has to date has this feature in the voting patterns.
It also had the feature that votes can be changed, and there is every prospect some will change. Keep your powder dry at all times, SN.
Ah yes another anomaly.... are you lobbying people then trying to get them to change their vote then? people like mel?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
