Fraudband

[IQS.RLOW]

Too bad, so sad.

Suck it.

[Jovial_Monk]

The non–engineer makes a senseless post, then again, pretty much all his posts have no sense.

[Rorschach]

Monks says FTTH is the future.... news for you Monk, no one said it wasn't...



Unless of course some other technology supercedes it.
Unless of course as the global trend is mobility is a bigger concern.
Unless of course it remains very very expensive. You know COST... the main point just about everyone has been pushing with you and you choose to ignore.

[Rorschach]

The non–engineer makes a senseless post, then again, pretty much all his posts have no sense.

Now now Monk, that's worse than anything mel and I said.... careful... you'll upset mantra and she'll come running in running off at the mouth and give you a gob full

[Jovial_Monk]

The dole bludger makes a post that I am sure makes sense to it.

Wireless will never replace wired broadband.

If cost is a concern why on earth roll out FTTN then FTTH? Adds to the cost.

[Rorschach]

Hmmm... not very economics minded are you Drunky Monky?
It's cheaper/more affordable to run it to the node and use existing infrastructure.
If people pay for their own FTTH from the node it's cheaper/more affordable.
If it's rolled out FTTN then it is cheaper/more affordable now and when more funds are available it can be rolled out FTTH.
COST you know. What have we estimated it will eventually cost now $94billion?
I'd have been happy as I've stated before and you've ignored and ridiculed along with the name calling crap.... that it is not a bad idea. But that the implementation is poor. It could have been rolled out differently and better. Where new technologies etc could have been included if necessary.

But no we have the blinkered boots and all mentality of the Labor Brown Shirts.

[Rorschach]

http://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/ev ... less-world

The world we live in is constantly changing. It is a larger, hungrier, older and more urbanised than ever before. It is also a better educated and connected, and more mobile and personalised world than ever before. Within the context of these global mega-trends, opportunities exist for communications technologies to help us do things better and faster. As we become more connected, we can change the way people use and engage with technology.

[Aussie]

Hmmm... not very economics minded are you Drunky Monky?
It's cheaper/more affordable to run it to the node and use existing infrastructure.
If people pay for their own FTTH from the node it's cheaper/more affordable.
If it's rolled out FTTN then it is cheaper/more affordable now and when more funds are available it can be rolled out FTTH.
COST you know. What have we estimated it will eventually cost now $94billion?
I'd have been happy as I've stated before and you've ignored and ridiculed along with the name calling crap.... that it is not a bad idea. But that the implementation is poor. It could have been rolled out differently and better. Where new technologies etc could have been included if necessary.

But no we have the blinkered boots and all mentality of the Labor Brown Shirts.

Ya know what amazes me?

What amazes me is that right here at lil' old PA we have all the experts the Government needs in Monk, Roach and NOIQ. I just can't fathom why other experts bother.

[Jovial_Monk]

Only idiots and Lib fanbois believe wireless will ever replace wired connections. A matter of spectrum, contention etc etc will prevent that. You have no idea, no experience in IT do you, roach? I reckon you have never held down a job, you are a dole bludger. And idiot.

[Rorschach]

Ya know what amazes me?

What amazes me is that right here at lil' old PA we have all the experts the Government needs in Monk, Roach and NOIQ. I just can't fathom why other experts bother.

Well that's one of the dumbest most simplistic disingenuous things you've ever said sine I've been here.

Congratulations...