One Nation - the state of play...

[Rorschach]

Was I supposed to?

Apparently you were going somewhere... don't you read what you write?

I was merely exploring the dynamics of the party you raised... and given it's Registered Officer (who is by your own admission a fool....) ...what’s the point of voting ON when the party itself is an absolute shambles?

Ah no that isn't so. And I have already stated many times over many years the party is dead and not worth voting for.

I'd delve into it further still, but I cant be bothered...now you have cheesed me off wanting to know who Ulrich Artur Heinrich Mehnert is, and or where he came from.

I didn't want to know anything about him... you brought him up. he is all your doing not mine.

.... Sounds like a German import.

Like I said mel i have no idea what you're on or on about. I doubt you do either.
As for foreign names... ON in spite of the Labor lies and crap written about it, it was like the United Nations, people of all sorts of backgrounds.

As for cheese, I have more right to it than you... you were clueless at the start and remain clueless you lost your way and wasted my time. All I've done is provided info where I can to your ramblings.

[mellie]

That said Roach... I now think Paulines vulnerability is a little contrived.
I think she can handle herself and knows exactly what she's doing.

$Ka-Ching$

[Rorschach]

BTW Oldfield is not a WET....
he believes in the death penalty
is anti multiculturalism etc, etc, etc...
as for Hanson already criticised her in the past re money etc... have done so since 2004 mel...
as for her motives today.
I think it is not just the money, or the fame/celebrity... I think she really believes she can make a contribution. I have no doubt she can, but just what sort is debatable.

[Rorschach]

As much as I have defended ON and Hanson in the past I have also acknowledged the plight of the party and the slow death of the party to the extent that they now are populated by the die hard ignorant.
This just proves what I have said to be true..

This story would be funny, if it wasn't true.

One Nation candidate Stephanie Banister 'doesn't oppose Islam as a country'
* by: SAM CLENCH
* From: news.com.au
* August 08, 2013 12:10PM

PAULINE Hanson's One Nation party has nominated a woman facing criminal charges over alleged anti-Muslim behaviour to contest the Queensland seat of Rankin.

Stephanie Banister, a 27-year-old mother of two, is facing criminal charges after allegedly placing anti-Muslim stickers, like "Halal food funds terrorism", on Nestle products in a supermarket.

Never mind that though. Ms Banister has bigger problems.

In an interview with Channel Seven, which aired last night, Ms Banister revealed her dearth of knowledge on, well, everything.

"I don't oppose Islam as a country, but I do feel that their laws should not be welcome here in Australia," she said, apparently oblivious to the fact that Islam is a religion, not a country.

"Less than two per cent of Australians follow Haram," Ms Banister said, arguing for a ban on Halal food.

The term "Haram" refers to something which is prohibited. It kind of works in this context. If you really think about it. OK not really.

In any case, Ms Banister doesn't have a problem with Jewish Kosher food.

"Jews aren't under Haram, they have their own religion which follows Jesus Christ," she said.

You're thinking of Christianity there, Stephanie.

"They don't have a tax on it, they've just got a certain way of making it where Haram has a tax on the food," Ms Banister said. Except, as Channel Seven pointed out, Kosher food does have a fee.

Ms Banister has some gaps in her knowledge.

Ms Banister was also asked her opinion of the government's National Disability Insurance Scheme.

"I believe that the disability scheme is working at the moment," she said.

The NDIS doesn't actually start until 2016.

Ms Bannister doesn't know who her opponents are either. Rankin, a Queensland seat currently held by retiring Labor MP and former minister Craig Emerson, is being contested by David Lin for the Liberals and Jim Chalmers for Labor.

"I'm still learning all of the names of people in politics," Ms Bannister said.

The Australian Electoral Commission will decide whether Ms Bannister can legally run for office. Candidates are disqualified if they have been convicted of a criminal offence punishable by at least a year in prison, and the One Nation candidate will soon reappear in court.

Ms Bannister admits she still has a lot to learn in politics.

"Everyone in the world has a lot to learn," she said.

Some people more than others.

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/national-news/fe ... z2bLI7h2Oj" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This is very very sad... and I don't expect they will replace her after this either.

As you can see I opened this topic with a balanced post that backs up what I have said re my position re ON.

[mellie]

Why so argumentative Roach?

How was I supposed to respond?

What questions would you have liked me to ask?


I simply delved into the party's dynamics...their apparent QLD hierarchy... what’s the big deal?

I didn’t think I needed to ask questions, given the party and it's turmoil speaks for itself.



Re- your position on ON....Valid!

On a more interesting note....

[Rorschach]

Why so argumentative Roach?

How was I supposed to respond?

What questions would you have liked me to ask?


I simply delved into the party's dynamics...their apparent QLD hierarchy... what’s the big deal?

I didn’t think I needed to ask questions, given the party and it's turmoil speaks for itself.



Re- your position on ON....Valid!

On a more interesting note....

Give it up mel.
Your conspiracy crap and aimless posts came to nothing.

YAWN!!!

[mellie]

What conspiracy Roach?

[Rorschach]

You really have no idea what you write do you?

Now can we get back to things not you? hmmm.

[mellie]

You really have no idea what you write do you?

Now can we get back to things not you? hmmm.

Roach, you accused me of posting conspiracy theories, re- ON....all I asked was that you show me where.

I think you'll find I have a good memory Roach, it seems you are making this thread more about me than anything else.

I have tried to move-right-along a few times, but to no avail.



One last time... please define where I posted a conspiracy theory re-ON.
A good starting point might be to read back through this thread.

Roach... it's ok, I’m not attacking you or ON, just noted a few ironies, that’s all.

[Rorschach]

Mel... you idiot, it's not my ON.
You seem to be working on a false assumption.
and I'll defend anyone or correct any lies said about them.

Conspiracy? Remember Rod Evans?
No conspiracy mel, just hopeless people left in the party.

Now do run along.