Jovial_Monk wrote:Both participants in the debate cheated, both were pathetic.
Partisan hacks trying to say one or the other was the clear winner—meh! Politics, democracy was the clear loser. We had a great PM who would have continued treating the electorate as adults and provided a clear choice but, nah, headless chooks would have chosen a better leader than Rudd and Abbott.
Gillard will go down in the history books as one of our greatest PMs, up alongside there with John Curtin.
You are an absolute twit, and have fallen for the New Labor movement hook line and sinker.
Furthermore, New Labour refers to a period in the history of the British Labour Party from the mid-1990s to the early 2000s, led by Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. So Rudds not even original, and neither was Gillard when she applied the vomit principle to her moving forward speech.
"My problem was not that Mr Rudd used notes but what he used wasn't worth reading in the first place," Mr Abbott told Fairfax radio in Melbourne.
Labors fan base --->(drop-outs, mongs, freaks, elites and people under 24) ...were always going to struggle with Rudds pseudo intellectualism and polysyllabic spools, simply because the likes of Monk have no fucking idea what he says half the time, and because of this they just assume he must be really really smart and knows what he's talking about.
Reality check---> Rudd hasn’t got a clue, hence the inability to survive without notes, someone else’s notes.
Rudd doesn’t read or write his own speeches... because he's a reader, not a leader, and you monk are a bottom feeder, more concerned with losing your fortnightly welfare cheque than the state of our country.
For me, it's about what my children and their children will inherit long after I’m dead, more to the point, what they will be forced to contend with as a direct consequence of this governments squandering corrupt fraudulent process.
Rudd is not a patriot, he's an elitist, a narcissist and probably a workplace sociopath if what his staff and colleagues say about him is true.
He's a real piece of work, and because he's devising policy under UN Internationalist directive, for those who have absolutely no regard for this country, only wish to suck it dry, he's dangerous. As long as Rudd has his UN seat, that’s what matters.
Re- Rudds new Labor, and it's applied "New Way"... sounds a little like president Roosevelt's "New Deal" doesn’t it.
