and show them they are a pack of useless turds.
He doesn't have to, they are doing a good enough job of this themselves.
I am wondering why our forum Greens supporters (The Greens are said to be staunchly opposed to what they call an act of human indecency) aren't opposing this policy in our MSM, preferring to ridicule the Coalitions instead?
http://greens.org.au/australias-day-refugee-shame
And will the Greens still exchange preferences with Rudd, who they regard as being a cruel right-wing radical?
"This is a rush to the right, a rush to refugee cruelty so that Kevin Rudd can rush to the polls," Senator Sarah Hanson-Young said.
My question is, do the Greens supporters who post here on PA support Senator Hanson-Young's views re- a PNG solution?
If so, why aren't they speaking up and supporting her , this and vehemently opposing Rudds policy, preferring to rubbish the Coalitions instead?
Could they be more concerned with losing preferences than with humanity itself?
And whilst the Greens are quietly albeit rabidly opposing Rudds policy on their own website, tut,tut,tut.. much of their views are yet to be seen in our main stream media.
As far as our MSM is concerned, it's like the Greens don't really have much to say at all, though were quite forthright when it came to trashing the Coalitions boat policy to the press.
Why so?
Hypocrisy and self-interest at it's best.
Thank you Senator Sarah Hanson-Young for stating the obvious without really having said much at all.
______________
Upon having read through the threads discussing Rudds boat policy, it's clear our Greens supporters on PA are quick to derail the topic at hand preferring to rubbish Abbotts policy instead, this and don't really have much to say about the PNG solution at all.
Or in the case of Skippy, he prefers to shoot the messenger, berating the individual who raises the subject of Rudds boat policy.
...... Did they think we wouldn't notice?
..... How so, can you define a LW conservative for us please?