Bumpity bumpIQS.RLOW wrote:You seem to want everyone to do all the work for you Chard.
Not capable on your own?

Bumpity bumpIQS.RLOW wrote:You seem to want everyone to do all the work for you Chard.
Not capable on your own?
And for shits and giggles I went ahead and read that other thread you suggested. I was right, none of you dumbasses know what the fourth amendment actually does or the relevant case law associated with it. Even better, you assholes have no idea what impact FISA exceptions have.Seriously, I dare any of you to A) demonstrate understanding of the Fourth Amendment, and B) how it actually applies to the PRISM program.
How does the PRC asking Snowden to leave Hong Kong to aoid diplomatic issues with the USand Russia traditionally not giving a fuck constitute "the world"? What I'm more concerned with is how someone like Snowden actually got a security clearance in the first place and why the hell the NSA is outsourcing their IT at critical installations.AiA in Atlanta wrote:The world doesn't want to cooperate in apprehending Snowden and I don't think it has anything to do with Obama at all ...
Why don't you explain it to us all? Shall I hold my breath for this one or are you still struggling with Google and a mouse click?Chard wrote:Ahem...
And for shits and giggles I went ahead and read that other thread you suggested. I was right, none of you dumbasses know what the fourth amendment actually does or the relevant case law associated with it. Even better, you assholes have no idea what impact FISA exceptions have.Seriously, I dare any of you to A) demonstrate understanding of the Fourth Amendment, and B) how it actually applies to the PRISM program.
Seriously, do any of you ever actually know what you're talking about on any topic at all? I already know IQ couldn't count his balls and get the same number twice, but maybe one you other mooks can.
I am a supporter of Obama. Early on he said he supported the de-criminalization of marijuana while in fact he has turned out to be a wolf in sheep's clothing on this issue. My take? He is, of course, politically savvy and picks and chooses his fights carefully. Are his supporters disappointed? Yes.Mattus wrote:Interested to hear from those who have supported obama and hold to his spoken ideals. The true believers. Is this a bit of a kick in the guts. Or is it just me? I wonder how Romney would have played it.
Sounds like you are making excuses...just sayin..AiA in Atlanta wrote:I am a supporter of Obama. Early on he said he supported the de-criminalization of marijuana while in fact he has turned out to be a wolf in sheep's clothing on this issue. My take? He is, of course, politically savvy and picks and chooses his fights carefully. Are his supporters disappointed? Yes.Mattus wrote: Interested to hear from those who have supported obama and hold to his spoken ideals. The true believers. Is this a bit of a kick in the guts. Or is it just me? I wonder how Romney would have played it.
No, it was about scandals in the Obama administration, and especially about abuse of government power for political ends.Mattus wrote:P.P.S. wtf am? The Obamagate thread was about Benghazi.
As you can see, the first two issues weren't about Benghazi, but about politicisation of supposedly neutral agencies. The second one refers to monitoring of journalists by the Justice Department - which is particularly relevant in light of the Snowden revelations.AnimalMother wrote:Watch the multi-threaded scandal grow.
Internal Revenue Service targets conservatives and Jews.
Justice Department phone-taps 200 journalists in lead-up to election.
Benghazi cover-up falling apart.
All at the same time. Are the wheels falling off the bus?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 65 guests