Fair Work begins court action against Thomson

[Aussie]

Looks like some humble pie will be eaten as the FWA case dilutes Wonder when it will completely collase.

TODAY IN the Federal Court, the case against Craig Thomson weakened, as Fair Work Australia appears to have backed away from its allegations against the Federal MP.

Fair Work Australia has decided to adjourn the hearing on virtually all of its civil matters against Thomson, including allegations around travel, accommodation, meals, cash withdrawals and, of course, those of brothel use.

All that remains of the civil matters is the allegations surrounding Thomson’s use of union funds for the purpose of campaigning for the Federal seat of Dobell. These are claims that Thomson has not denied and in fact was quick to point out that the HSU, which was affiliated with the ALP at the time, did indeed provide campaign funds for the seat, as it was one of the seats that the ACTU had targeted as focus electorates for that campaign.

I'm not sure it means terribly much other than to vindicate a comment I made somewhere that there was no way a civil action could remain current while criminal charges on the same issues were being pursued.

Here ya go. I posted this up there ^^^^^^^

The instant a criminal prosecution was brought, any civil one would be put into hibernation until the criminal prosecution was finalised.

[IQS.RLOW]

So the union dominated FWA backs off a corrupt ex-union boss...stop the press

[IQS.RLOW]

Poor Thommo- has to resort to begging on $190K per year

Have you contributed Aussie?
Why not offer your legal expertise so Craig can expect the same kind of service he received using union members money? With his history, your expertise, dedication and unswerving ability to see he has done nuffink wrong, you can be sure you'll both be fucked both ways till Sunday

Dear Friends,

The purpose of this web page is to provide details of an account which accepts donations for my legal defence. This approved account has been established by two supporters who have kindly agreed to act as the signatories.

I have made it clear on numerous occasions in the media that I am innocent of all allegations made against me before the courts.
I strongly believe in the constitution and that people are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Unfortunately these common law principles and accepted constitutional rights of every Australian have been abused by prominent politicians under parliamentary privilege and by some commentators.

I know that like me, a great majority of people believe in the rights of all Australians to defend themselves in a court of law. To help me defend myself against these wrongful charges, your donations are greatly appreciated. The account details are below.

Many thanks.


Sincerely

CRAIG THOMSON



ACCOUNT DETAILS:

Commonwealth Bank
Account Name: Mark Worthington & Rodney Allan
BSB: 06 2504
A/C No: 1055 0760

[Neferti]

There are many "innocent" men (and women) in Gaol. Thommo isn't one of them ... he isn't in Gaol, yet.

Wonder how many people will contribute? Aussie? Monk? Mantra?

[Aussie]

Legal fees can be crippling, so much so, that many people do not pursue their rights or give up their rights simply because it costs far too much. That sucks. I have a tidy enough financial position, but I would lose a debilitating large chunk if I ever was caught in a serious legal poo fight of the kind Thomson is having to deal with. I would not qualify for legal aid, and neither does he.

Good on him for not folding under the very deliberately intended pressure. One of the oldest 'tricks in the book' is to outspend your opponent, wrap him up in as many procedural issues possible, if you can.

[Super Nova]

Good on him for not folding under the very deliberately intended pressure. One of the oldest 'tricks in the book' is to outspend your opponent, wrap him up in as many procedural issues possible, if you can.

Totally agree. Scares the shit out of me.

Luckily I have never had to be in this position.

The system favours those with the resources as it always has. Legal aid doesn't cut it if you have a few bob and even if you qualified they are crap compared to a QC.

[Black Orchid]

He's on 190k per year plus 'perks'. He shouldn't be begging for money from constituents who quite possibly earn 1/10th of what he does. No sympathy sorry!

[Aussie]

He's on 190k per year plus 'perks'. He shouldn't be begging for money from constituents who quite possibly earn 1/10th of what he does. No sympathy sorry!

Shock me why don't you NOIQ?

[Black Orchid]

Pretty sure you have had your quota of ECT already

[Aussie]

Pretty sure you have had your quota of ECT already

This will be you soon: