Ashby

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Ashby

Post by Rorschach » Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:01 pm

You each failed to address this
Listen you stupid lying shit....

I already addressed it and told you to reread the topic again.

DON'T WASTE MY TIME!!!
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Aussie

Re: Ashby

Post by Aussie » Tue Apr 30, 2013 7:52 am

Well, the shit will be hitting the fan this week.
download (1)

By Joan Evatt

April 29, 2013

Editors note: Here is Joan’s preview of the appeals by Ashby and his lawyer Michael Harmer against the Justice Rares’ dismissal of Ashby’s sexual harassment claim against Slipper as an abuse of the judicial system. Joan will report the hearing for @NoFibs. Her first report is here.

Just when you think it is safe to re-enter still waters, the waves start to churn again. It’s a cause to pause. The matter of an application before the Court of Appeal to grant leave, and to consider reasons why Justice Rare’s decision in Ashby v Slipper should be overturned, will be heard this week.

The next saga resulting from Justice Rares’s decision in Ashby v Slipper was always going to be of interest. Public scrutiny of the appeal is further heightened because of one unusual aspect of the appeal. One of the appellants is Mr Ashby’s high-profile solicitor, Michael Harmer, of Harmer’s Workplace Lawyers.

For Mr Slipper, although the appeal is a continuing financial and emotional burden, this time should prove a slightly more refreshing exercise. Slipper is no longer on the back foot. Rather it is Mr Ashby and Mr Harmer who are both now fighting for their future professional careers and public standing.

Both applications contain identical grounds founded in Mr Ashby’s and Mr Harmer’s belief that Rares J erred in finding that the “predominant purpose” of Mr Ashby

“ … for bringing the proceedings was to pursue a political attack against the Respondent (Mr Slipper) and not to vindicate any legal claim he (that is Mr Ashby) may have… and accordingly that the proceedings were an abuse of process.”
Rares' decision was so well written and sourced, I doubt this Appeal will succeed. Costs orders in Slipper's favour will follow, and there will be some politicians, including Pyne, Hockey, Brough and McArdle with sphincter atwitching. Good old Phoney Tony will need to be careful as well,

:)

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Ashby

Post by IQS.RLOW » Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:15 am

Hahahahahahahahaha. Margo Kingston blog
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

Is this what you have to resort to for your 'authoritative' source nowadays?
:rofl
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Aussie

Re: Ashby

Post by Aussie » Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:23 am

IQS.RLOW wrote:Hahahahahahahahaha. Margo Kingston blog
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

Is this what you have to resort to for your 'authoritative' source nowadays?
:rofl
How do you think the Appeal will go, and I don't care who you refer to in your answer, so long as it includes your opinion.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Ashby

Post by IQS.RLOW » Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:31 am

No no, you stick with Margo for your opinions.
Her fucked up views suit yours down to a tee. Blind leftwing asshattery and always wrong.

:rofl :rofl :rofl
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Aussie

Re: Ashby

Post by Aussie » Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:02 am

IQS.RLOW wrote:No no, you stick with Margo for your opinions.
Her fucked up views suit yours down to a tee. Blind leftwing asshattery and always wrong.

:rofl :rofl :rofl
What was Margo's opinion?

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Ashby

Post by IQS.RLOW » Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:40 am

Aussie wrote:
IQS.RLOW wrote:No no, you stick with Margo for your opinions.
Her fucked up views suit yours down to a tee. Blind leftwing asshattery and always wrong.

:rofl :rofl :rofl
What was Margo's opinion?
Obviously the same as her learned accountant mate Joan Evatts and them, like you have little understanding of the law or the appeal as you have demonstrated more than aptly on here regarding Thomson and Gillards cases.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Aussie

Re: Ashby

Post by Aussie » Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:04 am

I was right on Thomson, I am right on Gillard, and I'll be right on Ashby.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Ashby

Post by IQS.RLOW » Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:12 am

Aussie wrote:I was right on Thomson, I am right on Gillard, and I'll be right on Ashby.
You were wrong on Thomson
You were wrong on Gillard
You are wrong on Ashby
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Aussie

Re: Ashby

Post by Aussie » Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:37 am

IQS.RLOW wrote:
Aussie wrote:I was right on Thomson, I am right on Gillard, and I'll be right on Ashby.
You were wrong on Thomson
You were wrong on Gillard
You are wrong on Ashby
Show me where and how.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests