Media Legislation

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
Aussie

Re: Media Legislation

Post by Aussie » Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:46 pm

boxy wrote:Tactless, but meh.

Rubbish!

He was belittling the woman, and making light of what are serious accusations. He was effectively calling her a liar, and defamed her. Will she sue? No way, as that (a) diverts attention from what she is alleging, and (b) allows Law further opportunity to attract free publicity, and to demean her some more.

This shit has to stop.

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Media Legislation

Post by boxy » Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:53 pm

An alternative view could be that he was asking her questions to allow her to make the point clear that she was in no way responsible for what happened to her. Unfortunately in a rather tactless way, that was open to misinterpretation.

It is a confronting topic, where it is hard to know what to say, when it's sprung on you, especially for an old man. Doubt he'll be on air much longer anyway.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: Media Legislation

Post by mantra » Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:10 pm

I don't think it was that bad. The woman would have spoken to people about it before. He was just direct with his questions.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 28 guests