Discuss sport related and outdoor activities here
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:00 pm
boxy wrote:It can be both. And allowing clinically depressed people to access guns (through lax regulation/licensing practices) only compounds both problems.
Allowing unregulated medication onto the market that increases the propensity for violence in the unstable would be the catalyst not the weapon itself.
If you ban all guns and the nutcases on SSRIs decide to drive GMC 4WDs through the playground do you think that regulating GMC 4WDs will solve the problem?
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Post
by boxy » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:19 pm
IQS.RLOW wrote:boxy wrote:It can be both. And allowing clinically depressed people to access guns (through lax regulation/licensing practices) only compounds both problems.
Allowing unregulated medication onto the market that increases the propensity for violence in the unstable would be the catalyst not the weapon itself.
If you ban all guns and the nutcases on SSRIs decide to drive GMC 4WDs through the playground do you think that regulating GMC 4WDs will solve the problem?
Sure, if that started happening, there would be no problem getting legislation restricting their licences to drive, either by limiting the size of the vehicle (think they'd be driving B-doubles?) or anyone allowing them access to such vehicles, or banning them from driving altogether.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:29 pm
The left aren't talking about profiling or restricting individual users, they are wanting restrictions on classifications of guns.
This debate is the equivalent of banning certain vehicles because a few nutcases have used them for mass murder
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Post
by Rorschach » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:32 pm
Why shouldn't ordinary citizens be restricted in the type of guns they can have?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:34 pm
Rorschach wrote:Why shouldn't ordinary citizens be restricted in the type of guns they can have?
Why should they?
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Post
by boxy » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:35 pm
You mean like how the different classes of explosives have differing restrictions on them, right up to outright bans for civilian use, for just those reasons?
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:39 pm
Explosives are not included under the second amendment
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Post
by boxy » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:40 pm
Neither are cars... yet you brought them up
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
-
IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Post
by IQS.RLOW » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:45 pm
My point exactly. They aren't
My example was an an analogy.
Yours was a justification.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Post
by boxy » Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:03 am
IQS.RLOW wrote:My point exactly. They aren't
My example was an an analogy.
Yours was a justification.
Mine was an answer to your, reductio ad absurdum, "analogy"
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests
