The family claim they knew nothing of the role she played in the phone-hoax (her having transferred a call to a colleague) prior to her death though India media are reporting something different, are still wanting answers.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/h ... 2bapc.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Biased reporting, and the assumption of guilt.
Note how Indian and British media alike are reporting how the Australian radio station donated $500,000 (which alludes to their taking responsibility for her death) though have failed to declare the 'undeclared' sum of money King Edward VII hospital have donated , this and are still asking for assistance and more support from the hospital , though why?
There has been no mention in India's tabloid of the hospital having "first" started a memorial fund for the nurse this and having donated an 'undeclared' sum of money to it to assist the family.
It's understood that the radio-station later then decided to donate to this "fund" also, though they were not who created it this or donated to it first.
India's media are quick to focus on Australia's radio donation, though wont mention who started the fund, and or why...this and disclose what the hospital donated towards it.
What was in the suicide note?
Why aren't we being told at least the gist of it, and or if indeed it had anything to do with the hoax call?
We are expected to reimburse this family for a hoax call she transferred to a work colleague, now imagine, what if this death had absolutely nothing to do with the call, what if there were other reasons this woman killed herself?
They would have to give it all back to 2day FM I suppose, yes?
The whole affair sounds contrived and 'Fixed" to me... ie the hospital knows what really happened, this and know why she killed herself though don't want the underlying reason to leak to the press, all for the want of upholding the hospitals regal image?
I doubt that's the only reason, and think there might be something else they aren't telling us which is driving the nurses family and the Indian community to ever so subtly, (via the media) to repeatedly state that they believe the hospital could be helping more, it's just, they haven't indicated how or what they mean by "help"..afterall, the hospital have already donated an "undisclosed" sum of money to the memorial fund they created on the nurses behalf, what , not enough? Then there's the $500k they got from 2day FM----or are the family just greedy, this and are just milking this for everything they can get?
What is driving this family to niggle away at the hospital?
Could it be a case of "Donate more or we will tell all."?
The truth is, we do not know if the nurse in fact killed herself, (some honour killings involve driving the individual to take their own lives, this and write suicide notes for assurance reasons).. or if she did, what the reasons were behind it, ie, what drove her to the point of suicide, because as the family say, it's unlikely that a woman as strong as her, and who did not have a history of mental illness and or some other reason for doing so (unless they are lying) would take her own life and leave two kids and a husband behind at Christmas.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/aust ... 37248.html
There are too many questions left unanswered.
Perhaps the hoax is on 2day FM after all, given they seem to be what's bearing the brunt of it all, this and have paid dearly (500k) for what may in fact end up being someone else's trouble or mistake.
If the family thinks they can gain more pursuing for collateral damage, then why blame one when you can blame 3 or more?
And if they think they can gain more from not appearing to be as angry with the hospital as they are the radio station then they might be inclined to do this too. If the hospital and it's management continues making it worth their while.
I hate to say it, but I think our beloved nurse Jacintha has become a sacred cash-cow for this facebooking family who appear to be milking this for everything they can get.
The more public sympathy, (via facebook, the media etc) the more they make.
Remember, Jacintha wasn't even living with her family, and hadn't been for over 4 years prior to her death, so for her family to say they were very close, well..... I beg to differ.
Woman close to their family's don't generally live in nurse accommodation away from their children and husbands, unless things aren't great at home.
She also converted to Christian, I wonder how her husband felt about that?
Is he a Christian too?
Did they attend church services together?
If so, why is the family spokesperson and Labour MP Keith Vaz, known by his Labour colleagues as "Vazeline" involved?
You know, the the guy who wanted to create a Muslim colony in Leicester this and has quite a murkey history for corruption though continues to escape consequence, hence they call him 'vazeline'.
Whats in it for him?
And why if Jacinthia was a devout Christian convert, would a Muslim Keith Vaz be spokesperson for her husbands family?
This and be demanding the hospital do more for the family, and by more, what exactly does he mean?
Throughout the media he's been planting the seed of doubt, alluding to the prospect that the hospital has much to answer for.
If he didn't think it was worth his while, why would he do this?
Again, what's in it for him and why?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... 00000.html
