Reasons not to vote LABOR.

[Neferti]

Aussie, an ex-lawyer, has a huge house and tons of room to board lots of muslim male teenagers (18-35). He'll even buy an extra TAXI so that they have a job.

[Rorschach]

[Neferti]

Wong displays her Green credentials – flies solo Canberra to Adelaide alone on 737

Cost 10000 each time.

Wong does this every other weekend. What a disgraceful bent lezzo.

Steven Smith does the same in a 747 at 30000 bucks a pop.

Tim Mathieson the fat useless carboot salesman on 300000 dollars of tax payer funds a year to balance on his spine, in between commitments to his shed, dyeing the Liar’s hair and running her bath. THAT TIM! He flew to Canberra today from Sydney on a plane all by himself to meet up with the Liar on a flight to Canberra.

But they dont want you to know that.

They want you to go short of cancer drugs, they want you pay more in electricity bills, they want their actions using your taxpayer dollars to be in your face. That is how deep the hatred runs.

http://pokiepleasures.com.au/wong-displ ... ne-on-737/

[Neferti]

Gillard helped Wilson to launder fraudulently obtained funds through Skater and Dodgem

But she did nothing wrong?

Its union speak. The fat arsed fake redhead with a penchant for married men and other people’s money thinks that by repeating over and over “I did nothing wrong”. And “What's the big deal?” that somehow she will be saved.

The fact that she doesn't understand she will be serving time shows just what kind of lawyer Gillard was, and how much she has developed since she helped Wilson to defraud the Ophans and Widows fund, and launder money through her own firm without the other partner's knowledge.

A big deal? you mean stealing the money from Orphans and widows is not a big deal? You mean profiting from fraud is not a big deal? Time you reaquainted yourself with the criminal code as you are about to feel its fingers squeezing your throat.

Imagine knowing her untrustworthiness and extent of her frauds but still give your support? Hey BULSHIITEN AND NOSEPICKERPOXON?

How could anyone pretend to be serving the country having been part of this?

The press should be belittling the Liar and putting her to the sword. Alas, they too are frauds and deserve nothing but your contempt. if you buy a newspaper these days you are an idiot – unless you want it for the TV guide.

Even the Australian has swayed from left to right. When they are in left mode you ought to be paid to read the crap written by intellectual pygmies like Always Insolent.

No doubt at the Australian they call articles full of clear ignorant lying balanced. While over at Fauxfacts all articles must start and finish with Abbott said…… Even if its a conversation with ET!

Imagine that a company had defrauded members as Julia has done!

The directors would be in court trying to avoid a long custodial sentence. Gillard however has no shame. There is no level to which the bar can drop where she will feel shame. She is union through and through. As even the true believers can now see- she has noone’s interests at heart except her own.

Dead woman walking. I cant wait to visit you in the pen Juliar!

http://pokiepleasures.com.au/

[Rorschach]

Faulkner's 'one strike' warning for Labor corrupt
December 4, 2012 - 1:01PM
Daniel Flitton
Senior Correspondent

Labor elder statesman John Faulkner has acknowledged a rotten few in the party ranks have ''neither political principles to defend nor moral convictions'' and called for the urgent adoption of a code of conduct for federal politicians. Gee, whom could he be referring to?

In a detailed and at times withering speech on transparency in modern politics, Senator Faulkner has lamented the allegations of corruption against NSW Labor former ministers and party officials. Corruption is a way of life in the labor party.
Labor powerbroker Eddie Obeid is facing corruption hearings that have also engulfed former treasurer Eric Roozendaal. and it goes from the bottom to the top.

After a political year dominated by scandals - including questions surrounding the conduct of former speaker Peter Slipper and Labor exile Craig Thomson – Senator Faulker's warnings will carry added potency. Both supported by Gillard.

He also warned trust in political processes could be ''undermined'' by large donations of cash or in kind. Union funding perhaps?

''It is time to publicly acknowledge that there have been some in our Party's ranks with neither political principles to defend nor moral convictions to uphold,'' Senator Faulkner told a University of Melbourne conference on integrity in government. Yet they have always been there.

''They are a small minority, in a very big majority of decent, ethical, people. But the fact that they are few in number does not diminish the gravity of the accusations against them, or the seriousness of their acts.

''To make that admission may leave the Labor Party open to criticism, but I am not so brazen as to make a speech about political integrity at a conference such as this and sweep issues in my own branch of my own Party under the carpet.'' Like Gillard, Swan, Rudd, Albanese, Roxon, Wong, Shorten, Combet, Emerson, Dreyfus, Plibersek and co.

Senator Faulkner - one of the authors of Labor's internal review following the 2010 election - called for a ''one strike and you're out" policy for any Labor member found guilty of acting corruptly inside or outside the party. hmmm... might need a membership drive after that.

''A culture has developed in the NSW Branch where, for some, being caught out at sharp practices is worn almost as a badge of honour. Our party would be immeasurably better off without such people,'' he said. so would the rest of Australia.
Senator Faulkner also criticised what he called an ''unedifying'' delay in the parliament delivering on a commitment after the 2010 election to introduce a code of conduct for politicians.

''I can see no justification for there being no code which sets out the applicable ethics standards for my conduct as a federal parliamentarian. It did seem after the last federal election there was a general agreement to right this wrong,'' he said.

He also urged adoption of stronger legislative protections for whistleblowers, describing the present laws as ''limited and inadequate''.

He said the widespread public cynicism about politicians and their motives was corrosive to democracy.

''It undermines the concept of mandate if citizens cast their vote without the expectation that their representatives will represent their views or act in their interest.'' So does not keeping your word.

Senator Faulker also expressed disapointment Australia had not signed on to an international push known as the ‘‘Open Government Partnership’’ numbering 57 countries.

''It is ironic that the largest recipient of Australia’s overseas development assistance, Indonesia, is a very active member of the Open Government Partnership and currently a co-chair, yet, Australia is nowhere to be seen.''

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political ... z2E3hUJxYH" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Neferti]

Billiard table legs!

[Rorschach]

Got this from an email...

http://www.liberal.org.au/united-failur ... dium=email" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.liberal.org.au/media/1121" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Rorschach]

A bad government was succeeded by an abysmal government
* by: Piers Akerman
* From: The Sunday Telegraph
* January 13, 2013 12:00AM

TODAY marks a dismal anniversary in Australian history, it is the day on which the Gillard minority Labor-Independent-Green government equals the Rudd Labor government's total time in office - 935 days.

Given the propensity for this miserable government to attempt to redefine failures as successes, it is possible that some foolhardy Rudd-hating, Gillard-supporting staffer may even pop a bottle of champagne in the office tomorrow when the current prime minister exceeds Rudd's abruptly curtailed term.

While the moment may be morbidly depressing for many, many Australians who would like the opportunity to vote for a party which can demonstrate a clear mandate to govern, it does mark an important milestone at which comparisons between the Rudd and Gillard government can conveniently be made.

Looking at the ledger, it is abundantly clear that a bad government was succeeded by an abysmal government. If anyone is in doubt the Rudd government was bad, just recall that Gillard told the public his government had lost its way.

When Rudd attempted a comeback at the beginning of last year, his party colleagues queued to describe Kevvie from Brizzie as chaotic, unfit to be prime minister, a psychopath and responsible for sabotaging the 2010 election campaign.

The Opposition let Rudd off lightly by comparison. Economic management provides a black-and-red yardstick to measure the two government's performances. In its first year in government (2008-09) the Rudd government produced a $27 billion deficit; a $54.5 billion deficit in 2009-10 and a $47.5 billion deficit in 2010-11.

The Gillard government produced a $43.4 billion deficit in 2011-12 before collapsing in a heap and crab-walking away from the future surplus it has repeatedly promised. It was the third major promise to be broken by the Gillard government after it had reversed its pledge on no carbon tax and no Pacific Solution for offshore processing of illegal people-smuggler clients.

Remember, too, that the Rudd government inherited a Treasury with a healthy surplus before it started its reckless spending spree which left Australia with $42.3 billion of net debt for 2009-10 and $84.6 billion of net debt for 2010-11.

The Gillard government (for factional reasons operating under the same hopeless Treasurer, Wayne Swan) then drove the nation further into the red by pushing our net debt up to $147 billion in 2011-12.

In the latest Budget update, net debt is estimated to fall to $144 billion by the end of the 2012-13 year, but the government's own monthly financial statements show that net debt continues to grow month by month because it is addicted to spending.

Five years ago, the Rudd government lifted the nation's credit card limit to $75 billion, increasing it again the following year to $200 billion. The Gillard government increased the country's credit limit to $250 billion in 2011 and again to $300 billion in 2012.

Swan, in the Rudd government, demonstrated poor economic management, but with the loss of some of the notional restraints applied by former Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner, showed himself to be a totally lousy manager under Gillard. To appear at all competent, Swan now resorts to pointing at failed Euro-economies, hoping the electorate will overlook the manner in which he has squandered national savings on worthless policies.

Another excellent and easily understood measure is provided by the flow of illegal people- smuggler clients. Again, Rudd started with near-empty processing centres as the Howard government had stopped the flow of boats. Under the Rudd government 140 boats arrived with 6,552 asylum seekers.

Under the Gillard government (which announced the "Malaysia solution" people swap which relied on a country that had not signed the UN Refugee Convention) 405 boats have arrived carrying 25,266 asylum seekers - more people than live in many sizeable towns - and there have been 1000 or more lives lost by those lured to try and breach the stretched border security net.

That number far exceeds the four lives lost during the bungled implementation of the Rudd government's ill-conceived $2.4 billion Home Insulation Plan which also saw the destruction of at least 224 houses, possibly the Rudd government's greatest policy failure.

Then there was the Rudd government's Building the Education Revolution, which inflicted school halls, many unwanted and unneeded, around the country at a cost of $1.7 billion and of course, the uncosted, unfunded not-bloody-needed National Broadband Network, created on the back of an envelope by the then prime minister, which now pays its CEO more than it gets from its customers (more on the NBN later).

As far as policy failures go, the Gillard government's carbon tax, which has helped deliver the largest quarterly rise in electricity prices since 1980, is hard to beat on so many fronts but then again there is its mining tax which last year collected no revenue.

Cost-of-living pressures under the Rudd government, from the December quarter of 2007 to the June quarter of 2010 saw electricity prices increased by an average of 34 per cent across Australia. Gas prices rose by an average of 26 per cent and water and sewerage rates increased by an average of 29 per cent.

Health costs jumped by an average 18 per cent, education costs increased by an average 17 per cent and the amount of rent people paid increased by 17 per cent as insurance costs leapt by 20 per cent.

Under the Gillard government, from the June quarter of 2010 to the September quarter of 2012, electricity prices soared by an average 41 per cent, gas prices increased by an average of 29 per cent and water and sewerage rates rose by an average 27 per cent. Health costs increased by an average 10 per cent, education costs rose by an average 12 per cent and the amount of rent people paid jumped by 10 per cent as insurance costs rose by 16 per cent.

An insight into the duplicity of both the Rudd and Gillard governments was provided on Friday. NBN announced it had exceeded its rollout target for 2012. This like so much of this government's utterances was sheer nonsense as the NBN's definition of rollout doesn't meet any international standard. All it means is planning has commenced in an office somewhere but does not reflect actual cable laid in any actual city, town or suburb. Ouch!

The truly disheartening fact on this bleak anniversary is that Gillard was a key member of the failed Rudd government and that she has not matched even its dismal record.

[Aussie]

How dare you post 'Akerman' as though it is Holy Writ? I note you are very quick to condemn left wing commentators, yet you soak up shit from this wanker while at the same time, keep assuring us how non right wing you are. You are really lousy at this.

[IQS.RLOW]

So do you have any comment on the content or does shooting the messenger pass as your level of debate?