Glad that you cut that piccie off at the waist, HUGE bums and billiard table legs do nothing for a bikini, even if the head looks OK.mellie wrote:It's only fair Gillard gets her gear off too.
Where's the budgie now, fellas?
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: Where's the budgie now, fellas?
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25703
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Where's the budgie now, fellas?
Gillard looks like a teenager there
At least Tony has a pretty decent body for a 55 year old. I would hate to see Gillard in a bikini now
At least Tony has a pretty decent body for a 55 year old. I would hate to see Gillard in a bikini now
- IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Re: Where's the budgie now, fellas?
I call fake.mellie wrote:It's only fair Gillard gets her gear off too.
The real Gillards tits would have her kneecaps in the same screenshot
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
- mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Re: Where's the budgie now, fellas?
Those cuties in their midriff tops do look a bit feminine and the shorts wouldn't be practical. After a vigorous workout their backsides would be hanging out, but with a bit of modification they could be OK. So could speedos if the manufacturers bothered with reinforcement - maybe some underwire for the more mature male.mellie wrote:The tank tops are too short, and they look stupid in bike shorts.
Wrong colour, wrong size, whoever chose this design really needs to be sacked.
Probably a gay designer.
Way too feminine.
I'd prefer this look any day.
- Black Orchid
- Posts: 25703
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am
Re: Where's the budgie now, fellas?
I was going to reply to your comment about them being indecent and disgusting. Did you change your post or was I imagining it?
Anyway, whether you like them or not I wouldn't consider them any more "indecent" than a bikini
Anyway, whether you like them or not I wouldn't consider them any more "indecent" than a bikini
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: Where's the budgie now, fellas?
I think Mantra deleted the indecent and disgusting bit.Black Orchid wrote:I was going to reply to your comment about them being indecent and disgusting. Did you change your post or was I imagining it?
Anyway, whether you like them or not I wouldn't consider them any more "indecent" than a bikini
- mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Re: Where's the budgie now, fellas?
Yes I deleted the indecent and disgusting bit in case RS got too upset.
I can't see how you can compare the two. Still - even if Abbott wore board shorts I would find him hard on the eyes.Black Orchid wrote: Anyway, whether you like them or not I wouldn't consider them any more "indecent" than a bikini
-
- Posts: 10255
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Re: Where's the budgie now, fellas?
mantra wrote:Yes I deleted the indecent and disgusting bit in case RS got too upset.
I can't see how you can compare the two. Still - even if Abbott wore board shorts I would find him hard on the eyes.Black Orchid wrote: Anyway, whether you like them or not I wouldn't consider them any more "indecent" than a bikini
It's easy to compare the two Mantra, Tony looks hot in his speedos at age 55, and Gillard looks like a pear-shaped beanbag with eyes, and to think, she hasn't even had kids to blame it on.
If I were a religious person, I'd say the good lord gave her that body so as to caution/deter, scare off members of the opposite sex, you know, the way blue ringed octopuses similarly turn fluorescent blue to scare off would be predators.
Jokes!
- mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Re: Where's the budgie now, fellas?
That's a first Mel - "Abbott is hot". There have never been any attractive politicians - perhaps Stephen Smith and Malcolm Turnbull were OK in their prime, but the rest of them are insignificant in their physical appeal.mellie wrote: It's easy to compare the two Mantra, Tony looks hot in his speedos at age 55, and Gillard looks like a pear-shaped beanbag with eyes, and to think, she hasn't even had kids to blame it on.
If I were a religious person, I'd say the good lord gave her that body so as to caution/deter, scare off members of the opposite sex, you know, the way blue ringed octopuses similarly turn fluorescent blue to scare off would be predators.
Jokes!
Gillard is plain, but she's not ugly. She's lost some weight recently and her dress sense has improved. Bishop is worse with those thin lips, bony face and huge jaw. I can't judge a female as sexy and I haven't studied Gillard in detail, but I sense that she has some sex appeal to males. There is nothing sexy about Abbott. Mel - you need glasses.
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Where's the budgie now, fellas?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests