Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

Post by Neferti » Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:38 pm

Aussie wrote:
Did you notice how that Reporter ran Brandis ragged with their very good questions of him?

;)
You really are clutching at straws. "ran ragged". :rofl Do you really think there was only ONE reporter asking Brandis questions? Brandis called several by name! Did you read ALL the transcript or just bits?


This is a case of alleged FRAUD. Paper trail. Plenty of so-called paper "evidence" and more will be found. Wait and see! It is not a murder where you need a smoking gun (like you see on TV).

Gillard lies so much that she will end up biting her own tail. She is digging her own grave. Stupid woman.

Aussie

Re: Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

Post by Aussie » Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:48 pm

This is a case of alleged FRAUD.
Maybe.....but not on the part of Gillard. Are you saying she is guilty of fraud? If so, name the fraud, and set out the evidence which supports the charge. Send a copy of your reply to the Cops..................it will save them all the work they need to do to mount the case, as you will have done the homework for them.

;)

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:25 pm

Don't need to. If Gillard won't spell out exactly what her role was in a written statement and address to parliament then she deserves to have this haunt her until she is driven out of parliament...and it will because she won't
:Hi

;)
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

Post by Rorschach » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:41 pm

Aussie wrote:
No evidence against Gillard? Here it is
Naffy.....what Brandis says, what Bolt says, what Smith says, what Baker says is not evidence. It is nothing more than their biased opinion, completely inadmissible and is not evidence. It is irrelevant political clap trap.

Did you notice how that Reporter ran Brandis ragged with their very good questions of him?

;)
Funny I never heard you describe the misogyny speech as irrelevant political clap trap. Nor all the other shit labor goes on with. :rofl :rofl :rofl
Selective moral outrage must run in your family Arsie.

Image
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

Post by Neferti » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:47 pm

Aussie wrote:
This is a case of alleged FRAUD.
Maybe.....but not on the part of Gillard. Are you saying she is guilty of fraud? If so, name the fraud, and set out the evidence which supports the charge. Send a copy of your reply to the Cops..................it will save them all the work they need to do to mount the case, as you will have done the homework for them.

;)
Why would I want to get involved with the Police?Both the Victorian and West Australian Fraud Squads are already on to this. She will be asked questions. The Cops won't be as easy on her as the media are. ;)

Aussie

Re: Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

Post by Aussie » Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:56 pm

She will be asked questions. The Cops won't be as easy on her as the media are.
....and if she is, she will deal with them in precisely the same manner as she has dealt with questions from the schmedia, and Politicians......and she will not be charged with any offence, because there is NIL evidence of one, not a scrap, nothing, nada, nil, zip and zero.

;)

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:08 pm

Charged or not...it is just another nail in her coffin



Prime Minister Julia Gillard as fairytale character Pinocchio. Illustration by Valdman. Source: The Advertiser

JULIA Gillard has proved she's a devious politician who couldn't lie straight in bed, writes Andrew Bolt.

---------------------------------

JULIA Gillard's disastrous performance on Four Corners on Monday is part of a disturbing pattern.

The question we now face: Is the Prime Minister of Australia a liar?

Julia Gillard deceives and, I believe, lies.

Here are the seven deadliest examples, starting with the one that first warned me Ms Gillard could not be trusted to tell the truth, even over something trivial.

The first: Just a part-time typist.

The Socialist Forum was a radical group that helped to bring former members of the Communist Party into the Labor Party.

In 2007, asked to explain her involvement, Ms Gillard said "many a long year ago" - and mostly when "I was a university student" - she'd merely done "part-time clerical and administrative work" for this "debating society".

In fact, she'd been on the forum's management committee, organising events and giving speeches.

The parliamentary register of interests states she remained a member of Socialist Forum from 1998 to 2002.

The second: I did not say that.

On July 6, 2010, Ms Gillard announced she'd talked to East Timor's president about her plan for a detention centre for boat people.

Her then immigration minister explained our "unauthorised boat arrivals will be returned to East Timor".

On July 8, after East Timor's prime minister said "what plan?", Ms Gillard rewrote history: "I did not say that ... I'm not going to leave undisturbed the impression that I made an announcement about a specific location."

On July 9, mocked for flip-flopping, Ms Gillard conceded: "I said in my speech that one possibility was a centre in East Timor."

The third: There will be no carbon tax.

Days before the 2010 election, Prime Minister Gillard promised: "There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead."

A year later, Ms Gillard had Parliament pass her carbon tax.

The fourth: Fooling Andrew Wilkie.

In 2010, independent MP Andrew Wilkie agreed to make Ms Gillard Prime Minister after she promised to make all poker machines have mandatory pre-commitment. Last month, Ms Gillard refused to put a Bill to Parliament.

The fifth: A bit of a lark.

In 2010, ABC journalist Annabel Crabb told a story of what appeared to be calculated deception that must have come from Ms Gillard.

In 1994, Ms Gillard was Labor's health spokesman, and "one night ... fired off a despairing text message to a friend, confessing exasperatedly that health was too confusing for her".

To her horror, she accidently sent the message to Tony Abbott, then the health minister.

Fearing he might embarrass her, she arranged to talk to a regional radio station.

"During the interview she laughingly confessed to having sent a tongue-in-cheek text message to her opponent feigning frustration with the minefield of health reform ...

"Had (it) been raised in Parliament, she would musically have read aloud from the transcript, demonstrating that the whole thing was a bit of a lark."

The sixth: The Marriage Act will stay unchanged.

Ms Gillard before the 2010 election promised that Labor, if re-elected, would not change the Marriage Act to allow same-sex marriage.

"We have determined as a Labor Party the Marriage Act will stay unchanged," she said.

A Labor MP this week introduced a private member's Bill to allow same-sex marriage, which Labor now supports.

Says Ms Gillard now: "The undertakings I gave to the churches are undertakings that I'm abiding by. There won't be a Government Bill."

The seventh: I did not plot.

Ms Gillard yesterday said she never plotted to remove Kevin Rudd as Prime Minister. "I made a decision to run for prime minister on the day I walked into Kevin Rudd's office and asked him for a ballot," she said.

But on Monday came the following exchange with Four Corners reporter Andrew Fowler.

Fowler: Did you know that people in your office, two weeks before Kevin Rudd was removed as Prime Minister, were preparing a (victory) speech that you subsequently delivered?

Gillard: Uh well, I did not ask for a speech to be prepared ...

Fowler: My question was simply whether or not you knew ...

Gillard: I heard your question and I've answered it.

So, is your Prime Minister a liar?

---------------------------------
[youtube]www.youtube.com/watch?nomobile=1&v=Wl2JIDJNcxA[/youtube]
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Aussie

Re: Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

Post by Aussie » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:17 pm

Bolt hey. Fantastic. A rabid right wing nut job, just like Smith, Baker etc etc.

;)

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:22 pm

Aussie wrote:Bolt hey. Fantastic. A rabid right wing nut job, just like Smith, Baker etc etc.

;)
I see you have no answers to the proof that she has demonstrated herself that she is a highly untrustworthy person.

She does not deserve the position of PM, which is why she has only ever been selected and not elected
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Aussie

Re: Slush fund story now 'over' says Burke

Post by Aussie » Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:25 pm

IQS.RLOW wrote:
Aussie wrote:Bolt hey. Fantastic. A rabid right wing nut job, just like Smith, Baker etc etc.

;)
I see you have no answers to the proof that she has demonstrated herself that she is a highly untrustworthy person.

She does not deserve the position of PM, which is why she has only ever been selected and not elected
Sure. Ya have to wonder just how such an undeserving highly untrustworthy person got the job and not the ever so arse selling, deserving Abbott.

Sucks to be you.

;)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests