How long until Gilliar gets dumped?

[Aussie]

Then what would you have to talk about?

It would be a shame to remove your major topic of discussion on this site

Mine?

[Rorschach]

To 'stone wall' or 'plead the fifth,' it is expected that there be an allegation of misconduct. There is none, not even you have one.

Do you?

Arsie... you keep forgetting the fraud and misappropriation of funds... you know the stuff the POLICE ARE INVESTIGATING.
2 morons on the same site... Arsie and Monkey Boy.

[IQS.RLOW]

Then what would you have to talk about?

It would be a shame to remove your major topic of discussion on this site

Mine?

Dumbarse says wot?

[Aussie]

Arsie... you keep forgetting the fraud and misappropriation of funds... you know the stuff the POLICE ARE INVESTIGATING.

No, I have not forgotten that. But......................where is any allegation that Gillard was involved in the fraud and misappropriation? You would be doing all of us a great favour if you would be so kind as to produce the good on Gillard's fraud and misappropriation.

[Jovial Monk]

There is ZERO evidence Gillard was involved in that, no matter how many conmen sex tourists they bring in.

The reason why this can be seen as Abbott desperately hanging on to the LOTOship is that this kind of muckraking would have been left MUCH closer to the election campaign.

[Jovial Monk]

ahahahahahaha IQless’ hero (and how appropriate this sleazebag is IQless’ hero )


http://twitpic.com/bfhnpr/full" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[IQS.RLOW]

I'm not the one who worships union thugs.
That would be you.

Although, it's interesting how the left roll over isn't it?
It's like they stand for nothing and have no loyalty- just ask Rudd

With the Obeid debacle running all through the election year and the stink of NSW inseparable from fed ALP, the election is already lost for the ALP.

They would lose due to NSW alone but it is going to be much, much bloodier than that. It will be a slaughter

[Rorschach]

No, I have not forgotten that. So you were just lying... ok. But......................where is any allegation that Gillard was involved in the fraud and misappropriation? You are alleging she is completely innocent because as yet there have been no charges laid, yet you know there is an ongoing investigation. You are trying to intimidate people here and counting your chickens before they've hatched. You are the one using smoke and mirrors. You are the one in denial of the so far presented facts. Even in infants they can add 2 and 2 and come up with 4 Arsie. You would be doing all of us a great favour if you would be so kind as to produce the good on Gillard's fraud and misappropriation. Really? how would I do that apart from presenting all the text that is readily available already to you? I suggest you take your strawmen and crap-speak and shove 'em where the Sun don't shine old bean.

When the investigation is over and if and when any charges are laid then you can try putting words in my mouth again. Believe me it won't wash then either. Until then why don't you do us all a favour and answer your own bloody stupid questions about non-allegations... perhaps you could define that crap whilst you are at it. How does one make a non-allegation exactly, and if one was capable of doing so, what would it look like? Could it be just that someone didn't actually make an allegation in the first place and you are just trying to infer they did through very poor English and being disingenuous. Of course it could. You lying Ratbag!

[Rorschach]

Oh and Arsie and monkey boy... there is proof that Gillard is involved in the matter, there is an ongoing investigation, Gillard was directly involved with Wilson and his "bagman", directly involved in advising them, directly involved in setting up the arrangements of various financial, legal and organisational instruments for them. Whether or not this leads to her being found culpable of criminal activity remains to be seen. But until it all comes to light it isn't looking good and she is not helping by being so reticent and obtuse in her disclosures. That in itself does not help her claims.

[Aussie]

You are alleging she is completely innocent....

Nah, I am not. I am not so silly as to make an allegation which I cannot substantiate. On the other hand, you are alledging by way of smear ["there is proof that Gillard is involved in the matter,"] that she has been naughty, and despite many opportunities to post exactly why, you have failed to produce the goods.

You really are so lousy at this.