Please explain............

[Aussie]

Piss off you idiot... I only said that after providing you with links and info many times before wanker.
Links and information you seemed to ignore.

The difference between us Oscar is that I know what I'm talking about you don't.
For you it's a one way street... you demand I provide I ask you ignore.
Even when I get fed up with you and tell you go look yourself I usually end up doing it anyway.

You have just proved yet again what a bad natured, hypocritical, disingenuous prick you are.

Oh, that is so sad. But, you did not tell me if you wanted me to show you where you posted that. No problem.

Here you go Elde Fruit.

[IQS.RLOW]

Johns did take drugs which enhanced his performance.

I think we are all waiting Aussie for your 'evidence' of this...or will you admit that you started a yet another thread that you have absolutely no idea about and made a dick of yourself again?

Perhaps you think the Indian bride should move in permanently with her boyfriend just because you used VB and Viagra to "enhance your performance"?

[Rorschach]

yes Aussie.... we are all waiting.
yet again...

you gonna do a runner now your mindless distraction didn't work?

[boxy]

I've always found it a bit strange, the way sports organisations test for performance detracting drugs, along with the enhancing ones.

[boxy]

Do all the gamblers who bet against him get a refund?

[Rorschach]

he was busted for possession.
not from a test

but yes that is strange when it happens.

[Aussie]

Do all the gamblers who bet against him get a refund?

Aaaaahhhhhhh! Finally.

And what of his prizemoney.

Who will sue......and what access do they have to evidence. At what cost for what benefit?

I do, of course, agree they could simply call Ratsack to the stand and shit it in. Easy peasy.

[boxy]

No, really, it was a serious question. I don't gamble. There must be some fine print to indemnify the bookies from claims for this type of shit?

I can't see them getting their money back from people who did bet on Armstrong, and won, so I guess those who lost are out of luck as well.

[Rorschach]

Oh poor Aussie...
Don't feel bad...
Don't get mad... just go away.

Unless of course you are going to answer those questions and apologise for being wrong again! And not being man enough to admit it.

[Aussie]

No, really, it was a serious question. I don't gamble. There must be some fine print to indemnify the bookies from claims for this type of shit?

I can't see them getting their money back from people who did bet on Armstrong, and won, so I guess those who lost are out of luck as well.

Yes, agree. What about the prizemoney. Will he be somehow (?) forced to pay it back?

What about the blokes who came second........third.................whatever.....................Well......I dunno.

But that "Sport" is in trouble.