Julian Assange to be extradited, says UK court

[Neferti]

I assume that I have better legal qualifications than he has

Very well. Show SF the legal error embedded in his position.

Acting like a sleaze and pretending to be a Solicitor when you actually drive cabs does not convince me that you have ever had an LLB or practiced as a Solicitor. Arts with Law are fairly common degrees. As are Arts with History, or Economics or whatever. You may have one of those but you do NOT have an LLB from what I have witnessed. Therefore, I am better qualified as a Solicitor than you are.

[Super Nova]

OK, Aussie the lawyer.

In the case of the 2010 WikiLeaks’ collaborations the mainstream media organisations took responsibility and justified the act of accepting illegally-obtained material with the public interest defence. A Federal Grand Jury is still considering what actions might be taken against WikiLeaks over the leaks but it does not appear at all likely to act against the New York Times.

Great articale here: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2012/03/05 ... egulation/
Let me know if you want me to help with some of the legal terms used......

Assange published on the net avoiding the laws as they stand. It is a new problem fo rthe world.

Media repuublished and claimed it was in the public interest... particularly since it's already out there.

Read the articile for more details.

[Aussie]

Acting like a sleaze and pretending to be a Solicitor when you actually drive cabs does not convince me that you have ever had an LLB or practiced as a Solicitor. Arts with Law are fairly common degrees. As are Arts with History, or Economics or whatever. You may have one of those but you do NOT have an LLB from what I have witnessed. Therefore, I am better qualified as a Solicitor than you are.

As I said. Very well.

Show SF the legal error embedded in his position.

[Super Nova]

Acting like a sleaze and pretending to be a Solicitor when you actually drive cabs does not convince me that you have ever had an LLB or practiced as a Solicitor. Arts with Law are fairly common degrees. As are Arts with History, or Economics or whatever. You may have one of those but you do NOT have an LLB from what I have witnessed. Therefore, I am better qualified as a Solicitor than you are.

As I said. Very well.

Show SF the legal error embedded in his position.

collaborations the mainstream media organisations took responsibility and justified the act of accepting illegally-obtained material with the public interest defence.

Next.

[Aussie]

SF.......I'll get back to you when Naffy shows me up, and manages to explain the legal problem embedded within your position. Clearly, I ought just shut up and defer to her, and so it will be.

[Super Nova]

SF.......I'll get back to you when Naffy shows me up, and manages to explain the legal problem embedded within your position. Clearly, I ought just shut up and defer to her, and so it will be.

Aussie,

I look forward to your reasoned legal argument.

I predict you will not provide one. Prove me wrong.

[Neferti]

SF.......I'll get back to you when Naffy shows me up, and manages to explain the legal problem embedded within your position. Clearly, I ought just shut up and defer to her, and so it will be.

You are a fool, Aussie, dig yourself a larger hole, why don't you?

You drive cabs, therefore you probably listen to Alan Jones or the Queensland variety.

You may think you are clever but not once have you convinced me that you were ever a practising Solicitor. A cabbie sure. But definitely not an LLB.

[Super Nova]

Nef,

What's an LLB?

[Aussie]

SF.......I'll get back to you when Naffy shows me up, and manages to explain the legal problem embedded within your position. Clearly, I ought just shut up and defer to her, and so it will be.

Aussie,

I look forward to your reasoned legal argument.

I predict you will not provide one. Prove me wrong.

Naffy is your Guru. Look to her, not me. I am a fraud because I drive my Cabs.

[Super Nova]

SF.......I'll get back to you when Naffy shows me up, and manages to explain the legal problem embedded within your position. Clearly, I ought just shut up and defer to her, and so it will be.

Aussie,

I look forward to your reasoned legal argument.

I predict you will not provide one. Prove me wrong.

Naffy is your Guru. Look to her, not me. I am a fraud because I drive my Cabs.

Coward.

I am not in discussion on these points with Nef. You made the claim... back it up.

Deflecting again just shows you have no ability to argue your position... which is wrong... now you realise it... you hide by deflection.

Busted again Aussie. Sad very sad.

How your brain works is a mystery.