Fair Work begins court action against Thomson

[Mattus]

Forget Thomson. What kind of fucking monster makes gloves out of kittens?

[Aussie]

Forget Thomson. What kind of fucking monster makes gloves out of kittens?

Much better that they be made out of young goats, wot?

[AnimalMother]

I'm fine with making gloves out of kids. Children are really annoying.

Leave the kittens alone!

[IQS.RLOW]

A very clear indication that Police are not interested in charging him with any criminal offence. I'd say this vindicates Thomson, and makes FWA appear vindictive. Ho hum...........

Aussie has just confirmed the depth of morality of a leftard is shallower than their gene pool.

According to Aussie, OJ Simpson was completely innocent, had no case to answer and his murdered wifes parents were just being 'vindictive'

You are scum

[Rorschach]

I say that this action by FWA tells us all that the police investigation is going nowhere..................if the Police intended to charge Thomson criminally, FWA would not have initiated these civil proceedings

You may say it Aussie, but it just isn't true.

[Aussie]

I say that this action by FWA tells us all that the police investigation is going nowhere..................if the Police intended to charge Thomson criminally, FWA would not have initiated these civil proceedings

You may say it Aussie, but it just isn't true.

It defies legal sense that a civil body like FWA would commence civil action, if it was likely that the State (any State) was going to commence criminal proceedings. Do you understand? Maybe not, so I'll expand a tad.

The instant a criminal prosecution was brought, any civil one would be put into hibernation until the criminal prosecution was finalised. So, no sense in commencing a civil one (FWA) if a criminal one (State/Police) was likely. Further, if there is an adverse finding against Thomson in these civil proceedings, such a finding would not disqualify him from being a MHR. If he was fined and did not pay, then he may be declared bankrupt, and that would disqualify him. But................by then....................the next election will have been held, and he becomes irrelevant.

Prove me wrong.

[Rorschach]

Well first off, it doesn't matter when justice catches up with a criminal even though sooner rather than later would be most peoples wish.

Secondly of course it is normal for both civil and criminal proceedings to occur. Out there in the real world there are countless precedents for it.

I don't have to prove you wrong when clearly you are, and you haven't given any real reasons for anyone to believe otherwise.

You ain't a legal giant that's for sure.

[Aussie]

Secondly of course it is normal for both civil and criminal proceedings to occur. Out there in the real world there are countless precedents for it.

Jolly good. You won't have too much trouble finding some links to some of those 'countless' relevant 'precedents.'

[Rorschach]

Why should I? Why don't you do it yourself?

[Aussie]

Why should I? Why don't you do it yourself?

You said there were. Now, you can't find them.

Ho ho ho, and a bottle of rum!