Oh just as correction to my previous post. B4 the pedants point it out and I have to explain it all again. Yes I know
Damian Murphy actually wrote the actual article in the SMH not
David Marr. But all the information was provided by
David Marr. Yes I should have been more careful and circumspect with what I wrote earlier. But the sight and sound of
David Marr or even just his name, makes me apoplectic.
Author David Marr sees a vicious streak in Tony Abbott.
Author David Marr traced a vicious streak in Tony Abbott.
Barbara Ramjan, a social work student in 1977, told the author and journalist David Marr
The allegation is raised in Marr's article, Political Animal: The Making of Tony Abbott, in the latest issue of Quarterly Essay.
For a political leader still struggling to gain traction with female voters, it is a hugely damaging allegation and perhaps unsurprisingly Mr Abbott's rebuttal was the only comment he was prepared to make when he granted Marr an interview for the article.
In his latest work, with Mr Abbott poised in opinion polls to capture the prime ministership, Marr charts his rise from university politics tyro through a learning curve of political fixer to Parliament and eventually the opposition leadership.
Marr traced the influences on Mr Abbott, including two Jesuits - one at Riverview and the other in England during his Rhodes scholarship days - John Howard and the ALP wrecking ball Bob Santamaria.
Marr said the Santamaria dictum - when you have not got the numbers be vicious - had become Mr Abbott's hallmark and, time and again, he had shown when there was a choice between values or politics he chose the pragmatic option.
Yesterday Mr Abbott contacted the Herald with an on-the-record quote: ''It never happened."
Read more:
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political ... z25pzyKLTl" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;