Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by IQS.RLOW » Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:01 am

I see Monk and his fucked up ideology has managed to kill another 144 boaties

You must be proud eh Monk? You disgusting filth of a human being
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Jovial Monk

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Jovial Monk » Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:27 am

It is your filthy party and the scum in it like Abbott and Morrison are preventing a real solution, the Regional Processing Centre in Malaysia.

Whatever you scream about this is just transference, shifting blame. If you accepted that fact about your party you could add your voice to the more decent of Liberal supporters calling for a humane policy instead of dirty politicking. Mind you, the Nats and Greens are just as bad!

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by mantra » Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:51 am

The Malaysian Solution makes no sense and it would be far more inhumane to send them there than Nauru. As it is we still have to take thousands from there because of the stuffed up policy.

I am disappointed in the Greens at present - especially Sarah Hanson Young. She is doing the Greens no favours with her interference and posturing and doesn't care about a decent outcome - only the sensationalism she creates.

Jovial Monk

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Jovial Monk » Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:24 am

Trouble with you, Mantra, and your mate IQ, you never read or think.

Under the Malaysian Regional Processing Centre refugees there could work, get their kids educated, have access to much better health facilities than now and they will know they are in a queue and will be resettled. What is wrong with that for fucks sake? Why do you think the UNHCR was happy with the deal Gillard & Bowen etc worked out with their Malaysian opposite numbers?

It would mean any arrivals here by boat would need to be flown to Malaysia.

More generally, it would mean ALL refugees would be processed and resettled, not just those with enough money to fly to Indo and get on a boat.

SHY is a sad excuse for a human being!

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by IQS.RLOW » Thu Aug 30, 2012 2:51 pm

You are a disgusting lefty piece of shit

ALP policies and lack of action kill people. Your Malaysian heap of shit has been rejected outright by the high court and the AS panel

How fucking dumb are you?
How many more people do you want to kill?

Gillard should be on trial for mass manslaughter

It's no wonder thesde people are flocking to boats under the ALP.
The ALP have demonstrated they are weak as piss and fucking hopeless
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25811
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Black Orchid » Thu Aug 30, 2012 2:52 pm

"Could" (get work etc) is the key word but highly doubtful that the majority want to.

Studies have shown that 85% of refugees are still on Centrelink benefits 5 years on, continue to have poor or no English skills and almost none of those with no education have tried to expand on their education.

94 per cent of Afghani refugees still receive benefits and will continue to ad infinitum.

I am sure they will be absolutely thrilled at the prospect of a job and education in Malaysia :rofl

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Rorschach » Thu Aug 30, 2012 2:56 pm

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-31/h ... ge/2864218" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Malaysian Non-Solution, involves;

* Australia agrees to resettle 4,000 refugees from Malaysia in return for sending 800 asylum seekers there

Malaysia get
8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)
We get
8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)
8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)
8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)
8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)
8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

What mental giant came up with that great idea? Obviously not a maths genius.

* Critics note Malaysia has not signed the UN Refugee Convention

Labor's initial lie was that Nauru couldn't be used because they were not signatories to the UN convention. Oh dear, talk about lying hypocrites.

* Australia to pay for health care, education and special welfare needs for asylum seekers in Malaysia for at least four years

:roll

Labor caused this crisis. No one else is to blame. Kevin and Julia knew better than anyone else, now look what's happened.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Neferti » Thu Aug 30, 2012 6:06 pm

In a word. Swan. Otherwise known as The Idjit. Wouldn't know what end was UP even if it was stamped in HUGE letters on the box.

Jovial Monk

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Jovial Monk » Thu Aug 30, 2012 6:53 pm

IQ, and doubtless the numpties Naffie the Drunk and BO can be lumped in with IQ, desperately screaming it is all Labor’s fault etc etc etc. Pathetic. Cultists rejecting any hint of realism, any word contrary to the cult’s teachings. Green scumbags just as bad.

UNHCR was happy with what was proposed for Malaysia. Malaysia will never sign the UNHCR Convention because they have huge numbers of refugees within their borders and they are not rich countries (not in comparison to refugee numbers already there.)

You lot are ALL happy for people to drown trying to come here by boat. Scum the lot of you!

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11788
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?

Post by Super Nova » Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:07 pm

Jovial Monk wrote:You lot are ALL happy for people to drown trying to come here by boat. Scum the lot of you!
I don't see them really saying that.

If you make it appealing to take the risk then they will come and accept the risk to their life if we are seen as soft.

We should have a policy of sending them all home straight away. Political asylum for very few. The process needs to be sharpened up to get them home on the next flight. We do this out the airports if they don't have the right paper work or lie. They are ecconomic migrants in the main. They have no place in Australia and should just be shipped home.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests