It would be funny if their ideology wasn't costing us billions and people werent dying because of them (
Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
-
WOLRSQI
Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?
Leftards are happy to use propaganda to push their white anting of the bad racist white society and they swallow the lot, propagate it and refuse to look at statistics (eg boat/people arrivals under the PS
Monk) but choose to use the Liebor spin sheet eg "push factors"
It would be funny if their ideology wasn't costing us billions and people werent dying because of them (
again Monk)
It would be funny if their ideology wasn't costing us billions and people werent dying because of them (
-
Jovial Monk
Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?
Here, for the benefit of the ignorant and moronic are the stats again:WOLRSQI wrote:Leftards are happy to use propaganda to push their white anting of the bad racist white society and they swallow the lot, propagate it and refuse to look at statistics (eg boat/people arrivals under the PSMonk) but choose to use the Liebor spin sheet eg "push factors"
![]()
It would be funny if their ideology wasn't costing us billions and people werent dying because of them (again Monk)

The Pacific Solution was a scabby little confidence trick.
-
WOLRSQI
Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?
Jeezus dipshit, I thought it had already been explained to you that graphs on AS intake means SFAX because it doesn't take into account that we have an allocation and economic boat jumpers (encouraged by dipfucks like you) remove allocation from the deserving languishing in UN camps across the world.
And the best excuse you useless white anting fucktards cheering ideology rather than results while people die is..."there is no queue"
You should be ashamed. You are no better than a fucking child killer because of what you promote.
And the best excuse you useless white anting fucktards cheering ideology rather than results while people die is..."there is no queue"
You should be ashamed. You are no better than a fucking child killer because of what you promote.
-
Jovial Monk
Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?
No, the Greens, Libs and Nats are the killers. All playing with this issue for party political purposes which is foul!
Hopefully soon the Greens will wake up and a Regional Processing Centre will be set up in Malaysia.
Hopefully soon the Greens will wake up and a Regional Processing Centre will be set up in Malaysia.
-
Jovial Monk
Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?
No, the Greens, Libs and Nats are the killers. All playing with this issue for party political purposes which is foul!
Hopefully soon the Greens will wake up and a Regional Processing Centre will be set up in Malaysia. The fact their support is going backwards should give them the wakeup call.
All through the so–called Pacific Solution boats arrived but Howard had had most of North and West Australia “excised from the migration zone.” No wonder than that Immigration Dept could show only 2 boats landed: many more boats than that did land but because where they landed wasn’t part of the migration zone that landing wasn’t counted and the ASs were shipped to Nauru or Manus Is or wherever. Shabby confidence trick.
Hopefully soon the Greens will wake up and a Regional Processing Centre will be set up in Malaysia. The fact their support is going backwards should give them the wakeup call.
All through the so–called Pacific Solution boats arrived but Howard had had most of North and West Australia “excised from the migration zone.” No wonder than that Immigration Dept could show only 2 boats landed: many more boats than that did land but because where they landed wasn’t part of the migration zone that landing wasn’t counted and the ASs were shipped to Nauru or Manus Is or wherever. Shabby confidence trick.
- IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?
So once again you have decided to use the "intake" as a measure rather that "where the intake has come from" and ignore the cap to try and bolster your shitty argument.
Your crap is straight from the Liebor shitty spin sheet which is fucking hopeless...transparent as fuck.
Go die in a hole you Liebor ball licking dasher of babies on rocks in the ocean
You should be pitifully ashamed of yourself
Your crap is straight from the Liebor shitty spin sheet which is fucking hopeless...transparent as fuck.
Go die in a hole you Liebor ball licking dasher of babies on rocks in the ocean
You should be pitifully ashamed of yourself
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
-
Jovial Monk
Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?
Those are asylum seekers reaching Australia, predominantly these are “boat people” and that chart shows the complete failure of the Pacific Solution. It also shows push factors are overwhelmingly the reason for fluctuations in the numbers. This does not include family reunion or humanitarian intake, it is boat people.
That goes against the fairy tales spun by Howard, Reith, Ruddock and more latterly Abbott and Scott Morrisson.
Note that IQ could present little more than codeine rage in response to the chart I presented. He seemed to have been well in his cups when he made his last post above.
That goes against the fairy tales spun by Howard, Reith, Ruddock and more latterly Abbott and Scott Morrisson.
Note that IQ could present little more than codeine rage in response to the chart I presented. He seemed to have been well in his cups when he made his last post above.
- mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?
Monk the chart is irrelevant when you consider how many refugees arrive here compared to our small population. If it was judged per capita our intake is larger than even the USA. We have now increased the numbers to 20,000 and shortly it will increase to 27,000. Add their families and the dozen or so children they produce and these numbers are unsustainable.
Do other countries spend as much as us in trying to make them comfortable? Forty years ago they were housed in basic cabins, cooked for themselves and were given a time limit to find work. Now we're just bringing in thousands of sick people who can contribute very little or nothing and will have to be nursed for the rest of their lives. Look at the numbers claiming compensation and there will be hundreds, maybe thousands more who will do the same.
Of course we should be considered humane by the rest of the world - but at what cost. We're suckers.
Do other countries spend as much as us in trying to make them comfortable? Forty years ago they were housed in basic cabins, cooked for themselves and were given a time limit to find work. Now we're just bringing in thousands of sick people who can contribute very little or nothing and will have to be nursed for the rest of their lives. Look at the numbers claiming compensation and there will be hundreds, maybe thousands more who will do the same.
Of course we should be considered humane by the rest of the world - but at what cost. We're suckers.
-
Jovial Monk
Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?
The chart is relevant to dispell the myth about the Pacific Solution.
I would like the refugees not to have to get on unsafe boats, is that so bad? Well it is according to the three conservative parties the Greens/Libs/Nats because BOATS! is good to use to get people to vote for them. Not nice but that is the situation. Another 150 ended up in the sea yesterday, a few survivors have been seen.
As regards to the other crap you spouted—how about some links to some reliable sources or are you just pulling your “facts” out of your capacious arse?
Oh, and our intake is tiny compared to our situation. Look up HM Syrian refugees Jordan is hosting ATM.
I would like the refugees not to have to get on unsafe boats, is that so bad? Well it is according to the three conservative parties the Greens/Libs/Nats because BOATS! is good to use to get people to vote for them. Not nice but that is the situation. Another 150 ended up in the sea yesterday, a few survivors have been seen.
As regards to the other crap you spouted—how about some links to some reliable sources or are you just pulling your “facts” out of your capacious arse?
Oh, and our intake is tiny compared to our situation. Look up HM Syrian refugees Jordan is hosting ATM.
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Is Nauru going to be good enough for the refugees?
You JM are a complete nincompoop... even labor stopped using the PUSH word after refugee after refugee told them why they were coming here. Like the Indonesians say... the sugar on the table.
the graph doesn't prove anything you said it does.
Ever heard that correlation does not equal causation?
BTW it has been explained to you now several times in plain language.. wassup English not your first language?
the graph doesn't prove anything you said it does.
Ever heard that correlation does not equal causation?
BTW it has been explained to you now several times in plain language.. wassup English not your first language?
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests