No, a realistic one. The people who you put up, well, most of them represent the lunatic side of the "debate". The people I put up, represent the sensible side, Bogan. Learn to live with it.


No, a realistic one. The people who you put up, well, most of them represent the lunatic side of the "debate". The people I put up, represent the sensible side, Bogan. Learn to live with it.
Alleviated
"...where the creeks are dry or they're ten feet high and it's always drought or plenty"Bobby submitted
Rain north-east of Chinchilla had empty dams overflowing in a few short hours.
"Anybody who I disagree with is an anti-intellectual child. People who express opinions that I agree with are the epitome of high intellectualism, cause I'm just all that with my "Bas" in bullshit. Tsk tsk.brian ross wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:31 pmNo, a realistic one. The people who you put up, well, most of them represent the lunatic side of the "debate". The people I put up, represent the sensible side, Bogan. Learn to live with it.![]()
![]()
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation ... e15f304791.......... Mr Taylor said Australia was responsible for only 1.3 per cent of global emissions and could not have a meaningful impact without co-operation of the largest emitters such as China and the US.
He said Australia had done better than similar countries such as Canada and New Zealand.
Since 2005, Australia’s emissions had fallen 12.9 per cent compared with 2 per cent in Canada and a rise of 4 per cent in New Zealand.
In that time, China’s emissions had risen 67 per cent and India 77 per cent ..............
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests