Constitution
Re: Constitution Update - Vote
Because Mr Peedrinker, you only want this vote held so people are no longer able to say they did not sign onto your Constitution, isn't that so? So few people around a Petition to vote on another change to the Constitution will never succeed.
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Constitution Update - Vote
I have many reasons. That is not one of them. Speak for yourself.you only want this vote held so people are no longer able to say they did not sign onto your Constitution
This is a vote (referendum) not a petition.So few people around a Petition to vote on another change to the Constitution will never succeed.
Re: Constitution Update - Vote
*Cough*Ned Kelly wrote:freeloader, can you help us out here? Can you lead us to the Thread where this Board voted to accept any Constitution? There's a good chap. You are here to 'serve,' yes?
Mr. Freeloader, your answer? I am your master. You must serve..........the Members.
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Constitution Update - Vote
I am not here to serve you Aussie.
- Super Nova
- Posts: 11787
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Re: Constitution Update - Vote
my vote = YES
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
Re: Constitution Update - Vote
Before this vote is closed off, boxy, seeing as how freeloader considers himself above service to the Members, can you lead us to where this Forum voted to accept the 'current' Constitution?
- freediver
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Constitution Update - Vote
Are you Aussie also?
Re: Constitution Update - Vote
*Bump* for Boxy.Yogi wrote:Before this vote is closed off, boxy, seeing as how freeloader considers himself above service to the Members, can you lead us to where this Forum voted to accept the 'current' Constitution?
- boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Re: Constitution Update - Vote
My vote is yes.
They voted with their presence. Freediver offered to provide this board for our use, free of charge, and we accepted it, with his constitution in place. We're always free to just walk away, but given that freediver is open to us creating our own rules, PA doesn't see any real need to move on, or even put much effort into changing the constitution, because, frankly, it just doesn't affect the way well intentioned posters post, at all. We talk our shit, and the mods stay out of it, unless posters actively go looking to get moderated. It's the PA way.Yogi wrote:Before this vote is closed off, boxy, seeing as how freeloader considers himself above service to the Members, can you lead us to where this Forum voted to accept the 'current' Constitution?
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests