Sci - Goldilocks planet is no fairytale

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Sci - Goldilocks planet is no fairytale

Post by boxy » Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:38 pm

AiA in Atlanta wrote:“Each being in the universe yearns for the free energy necessary for survival and development. Each existence resists extinction. The consequent history of violence in the universe is as inevitable as the gravitational pull between the Earth and the Sun.”
So, you think that an intelligent creator would make a universe, where self aware being get ahead by fighting for free energy, leading to the violent natures of all higher beings?
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Sci - Goldilocks planet is no fairytale

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Sat Dec 24, 2011 1:31 am

boxy wrote:
AiA in Atlanta wrote:“Each being in the universe yearns for the free energy necessary for survival and development. Each existence resists extinction. The consequent history of violence in the universe is as inevitable as the gravitational pull between the Earth and the Sun.”
So, you think that an intelligent creator would make a universe, where self aware being get ahead by fighting for free energy, leading to the violent natures of all higher beings?
Planets collide.

You seem to be referring to an anthropomorphic desert god "out there" which is not what this passage refers to at all.

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11786
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Sci - Goldilocks planet is no fairytale

Post by Super Nova » Sat Dec 24, 2011 2:00 am

Aia,

Are you trying to say thateach life form is compete to resources (the free energy) and therefore conflict over these resources is natural leading to a violent universe for lifefiorm, consistent with what happens else where where violent events occur (like planets coliding).

Natural selection is based on this premise btw.

Nothing to do with a god, even an angry destructive one, it is just how the equations are played out.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Sci - Goldilocks planet is no fairytale

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:58 pm

Have found the problem with this type of discussion is that few are really able to let go of their childish notions of God and consider something more sophisticated.

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Sci - Goldilocks planet is no fairytale

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:45 am

What I mean is that there are other, higher, nontraditional ways of looking at god.

Aussie

Re: Sci - Goldilocks planet is no fairytale

Post by Aussie » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:49 am

AiA in Atlanta wrote:What I mean is that there are other, higher, nontraditional ways of looking at god.
Tell us about them....and when you do so, explain why anyone with half a brain gets up you about them.

User avatar
AiA in Atlanta
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:44 pm

Re: Sci - Goldilocks planet is no fairytale

Post by AiA in Atlanta » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:57 am

Aussie wrote:
AiA in Atlanta wrote:What I mean is that there are other, higher, nontraditional ways of looking at god.
Tell us about them....and when you do so, explain why anyone with half a brain gets up you about them.
Where shall I begin? Well, there is the ethnocentric, tribal god. The ancient Hebrew god is a good example of that ...

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Sci - Goldilocks planet is no fairytale

Post by IQS.RLOW » Tue Dec 27, 2011 1:02 am

Aussie and faith are as far removed as Aussie and reality
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Sci - Goldilocks planet is no fairytale

Post by boxy » Tue Dec 27, 2011 11:13 am

AiA in Atlanta wrote:
boxy wrote:
AiA in Atlanta wrote:“Each being in the universe yearns for the free energy necessary for survival and development. Each existence resists extinction. The consequent history of violence in the universe is as inevitable as the gravitational pull between the Earth and the Sun.”
So, you think that an intelligent creator would make a universe, where self aware being get ahead by fighting for free energy, leading to the violent natures of all higher beings?
Planets collide.

You seem to be referring to an anthropomorphic desert god "out there" which is not what this passage refers to at all.
AiA in Atlanta wrote:Have found the problem with this type of discussion is that few are really able to let go of their childish notions of God and consider something more sophisticated.
Well, are you talking about an intelligent creator being, or not?

Is it just some universal "gaia" character... instead, where the universe is seen as intelligent itself?

Fact is, all of these possibilities are no more improbable than the BB simply being a random event... but science doesn't care whether it's current "best guess" (and that's all it is, when it gets to talk of things before the BB) turns out to be wrong. Science will be investigating that for the rest of humanities time in the universe, and if you want my opinion, they'll never come to an absolute answer.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11786
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Sci - Goldilocks planet is no fairytale

Post by Super Nova » Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:20 pm

Science will be investigating that for the rest of humanities time in the universe, and if you want my opinion, they'll never come to an absolute answer.
I nearly agree with this. If we don't become extinct or we evolve/create a form a life (not as we know it) that continues the quest we may find out. I do think it is highly improbable to really know because it is difficult to see what is behind, below ot outside the universe when you are a part of it.

We will continue to have better theories that represent what we observe but may never know the truth.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 81 guests