Bush was not a genius, he was still giddy with election victory when just 8 months months into his tenure, he was faced with what appeared to be the end of the world , impulsively and sickened by the disturbing scenes of ground zero, still coming from the UN-planted Muslim terrorists, he did what his country expected him to do, go in and get those muzzy bastards, it's just, they weren't the underlying enemy, were like Libyas UN and NATO groomed rebels, possibly not even aware of why they were there themselves.mellie wrote:Early on in his term, the Bush administration withdrew from a number of international treaty processes, notably the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. This did not please the UN, NATO, and communist orgs around the world Labor and Obama might call their church, in the absence of a declared faith and their both refusing to swear themselves into government on the Holy Bible.
Then a series of terrorist attacks occurred eight months into Bush's first term as president on September 11, 2001. In response, Bush announced a global War on Terror, ordered a an invasion of Afghanistan that same year and an invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Problem was, the enemy was within...the UN, NATO, the communists had to get rid of Bush and Howard to form a world super- government, and leaving enough clues to suggest this was an inside job, this and Bush being in power at the time when the incident occurred rendered him the culprit.
Why rule a nation when you can rule the world. This is their philosophy.
The terrorists are the UN, Nato, and it's communist tentacle organisations and elitist self-serving alliances.
See, Muslims living in the western world (other than in the nations the UN made it look like extremist Muslims were declaring war on the western world) knew it was an inside job, and just assumed it must have been Bush, he being who declared war on them afterall... BUT... the real enemy was the UN, Nato, global communists alluding to Muslims being the enemy, appealing to Bush's republican red-neck ignorance, when they pressed all his buttons on 9/11 and theatrically struck a chord.
Now, had Bush thought about it, just sat back for a few months and gathered intelligence, he may have never invaded at all.
Because within months of him having done so, he realised he made a very big mistake, then had to save face by planting bombs, weapons of mass delusion..., alluding to the enemy being there, because he felt stupid, was fully expecting to find something, but didn't.
He thought the weapons were there due to cooked intelligence documents scribed by infiltrates working from within his own administration and said global "nice guys" the UN and her friends of the earth to allude to the very real possibility there were weapons of Mass destruction, when even those said Al Qaeda cells only served to reinforce the likelihood of there being WMD's in there.
Also, once you have invaded a nation, you cant pull out half way through even if you realise this has all been a sick attempt by the UN to become our world government.
The threats coming from the terrorists groups was staged initially by the UN and NATO commy socialist 'save the earth' global alliances...they would have been plotting this for years, perhaps even decades, perhaps even when Bush Senior was President himself.
It's communism, UN's New World Order -vrs- the rest of the world , be they Muslims, Christians, whatever....the UN will expend who they have to to meet their globalist objective, a world government chaired by the dirtiest grubs imaginable.
Smart or dumb, Bush could not have possibly been expected to know in an instant who was behind it, particularly when the media were publishing their UN-instigated threats and accepting ownership for their crimes claiming they were from terrorist net-works.
Some researchers believe Osama Bin Laden was indeed Jewish, and lead the militant arm of the "Global Community" UN alliance come world super-government.
Al Qaeda may be a Jewish organisation, http://articles.cnn.com/2009-06-13/worl ... s=PM:WORLD
As UN-lead Al Qaeda calls on Muslims to fight Israel, which is essentially its militant covert alliance fighting itself,
... Like Howard said, it's Lazarus rising, Emma Lazarus.
Still falls the Rain
At the feet of the Starved Man hung upon the Cross.
Christ that each day, each night, nails there, have mercy on us—
On Dives and on Lazarus:
Under the Rain the sore and the gold are as one
http://xroads.virginia.edu/~cap/liberty ... spoem.html
What is more American than the Statue of Liberty, you ask? The immortal words of Emma Lazarus a Jewish feminist Zionist fastened to the base of the statue of 'Libertus' not Liberty, , hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, eh?
This is Emma Lazarus's poem, and libertus represents a Jewish woman breaking free from her chains, a womans oppression as a woman first, and a Jew second in a western mans world.
The New Colossus
Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame,
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
by Emma Lazarus, New York City, 1883
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermai ... 00137.html
Libertas is not a statue of Liberty, she represents the rise of Lazarus, Jewish Zionism.
Libertas was even pictured on Galba's "Freedom of the People" coins
Also:--a little known fact,
The Quran expressly states that Jews are to be treated favorably, though subject to certain taxes for not converting to Islam.
It's an ancient war, one civilization has been fighting for thousands of years, and probably will for many a thousand to come.