Who could trust them?

[IQS.RLOW]

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nationa ... 6022832982

JULIA Gillard has promised she will not allow jobs in heavily polluting trade-exposed industries to go overseas under her emissions pricing regime, and declared that this year may be the nation's last chance to strike a deal on a carbon price.

Delivering the Don Dunstan Lecture in Adelaide last night, the Prime Minister vowed to protect existing jobs and predicted that a carbon pricing regime would create a wealth of new jobs in clean-energy generation, electric and hybrid cars, manufacturing of clean-energy equipment and energy-efficient construction.

Ms Gillard declared that only Labor could deliver a decision to cut carbon pollution and build a clean-energy economy.

I would say, who is the last party on earth that you could trust to deliver something of such importance

[Sappho]

Well how the hell are you going to have a cleaner, greener energy industry and economy if you are not going to allow job redundancy in coal and training for the cleaner, greener growing industry?

Dullard must allow jobs in carbon intensive industries to go to the nations that are carbon intensive... that is; developing nations. She must also train the future employees of eco energy industries. Then she must fund research and development eco projects of merit (either private industry based or academically based) as judged by an academic panel from diverse fields of study.

You must have a vision Dullard... where is it? All I hear is tax, levy and inflated costs for the end user.

[boxy]

Well how the hell are you going to have a cleaner, greener energy industry and economy if you are not going to allow job redundancy in coal and training for the cleaner, greener growing industry?

She didn't say there wouldn't be redundancies, she said she wouldn't allow the jobs to go overseas

Politicaians are only second to lawyers and used car salesmen, when it comes to using the fine print to screw us over.

[Ned Kelly]

All the more reason to read what they say, and not assume they are saying what you want to hear, 'huzzah!'

[IQS.RLOW]

She didn't say there wouldn't be redundancies, she said she wouldn't allow the jobs to go overseas

She won't be able to stop it.

The sovereign risk that liebor has attracted for Australia should have the fluffy bunnies fucking sacked

[boxy]

She didn't say there wouldn't be redundancies, she said she wouldn't allow the jobs to go overseas

She won't be able to stop it.

Well, exactly. Outsourcing is an economic decision. If it's made cheaper elsewhere because of a carbon tax, then the global market will source it elsewhere, and the jobs will follow.

[boxy]

All the more reason to read what they say, and not assume they are saying what you want to hear, 'huzzah!'

All the more reason to read what they say, and assume that they're not like real humans, and will lie directly to your face.

[Ned Kelly]

Politicaians are only second to lawyers and used car salesmen, when it comes to using the fine print to screw us over.

How is that the same as:

All the more reason to read what they say, and assume that they're not like real humans, and will lie directly to your face.

(Psst boxy....the spell checker function seems to be on malfunction.)

[Sappho]

Well how the hell are you going to have a cleaner, greener energy industry and economy if you are not going to allow job redundancy in coal and training for the cleaner, greener growing industry?

She didn't say there wouldn't be redundancies, she said she wouldn't allow the jobs to go overseas

Call it lazy rhetoric on my part. Remembering that I also said...

Dullard must allow jobs in carbon intensive industries to go to the nations that are carbon intensive... that is; developing nations.

Reason being; Developing nations need those skills more than we do. We need eco trained employees for the energy industry... don't we?

Politicaians are only second to lawyers and used car salesmen, when it comes to using the fine print to screw us over.

Cop out. We let them.