ABC not biased?????

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

ABC not biased?????

Post by Rorschach » Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:52 pm

Heard the new ABC MD prattling on yesterday after Waleed Aly's prattling.
Made me laugh.
Unbiased, quality commentary and now more diversity... which explains why a LW Progressive Muslim Apologist was talking just before her.
I thought we had diversity in broadcasting... I thought that is what SBS was.
ABC’s diversity push? Forgive me for chuckling
The Australian
October 17, 2016
Chris Kenny

Forgive me for chuckling at the ABC’s new diversity push. Apparently new managing director Michelle Guthrie wants to boost the national broadcaster’s quota of program producers from non-English speaking backgrounds (NESB).

Fair enough, you might think — although, of course, their English standards will need to be adequate, and we presume everyone will be employed on merit so that there won’t be any poor young graduates denied a journalism cadetship or researcher’s job because they had the misfortune of growing up in a household that spoke the mother tongue.

It has always struck me as curious that the most common accents heard at the ABC are from the United Kingdom. Switch on the television or radio any day and you’ll hear journalists, newsreaders and hosts who have the ring of the British Isles about them. Even the Australian accents tend to be as cultured as we hear in this country.

The accents you don’t strike on the ABC are the most common ones on the streets of our cities, suburbs and towns — the western Sydney rasp, Queensland backblocks drawl, clipped intonations of Chinese and Vietnamese Australians, sing-song South Asian tones or those familiar hints of Italian and Greek pronunciations. It is strange — we don’t even hear the pleasant peculiarities of Aboriginal English.

Nup, the ABC prefers the most English of English, where possible — a cultural cringe if ever there was one.

So any effort to make their staff more representative of mainstream Australia will be a winner for audiences and can’t help but improve their plurality and therefore their perception. But don’t bank on it. Promises about diversity from the ABC have to be judged against their record.

At some stage in the future they will point to their NESB statistics and tell us they have improved. We might see a greater variety of skin tones and names and back stories but there is a fair chance we won’t hear a wider variety of accents — if the past is any guide the mainstream Australian accents will still give way to the influences of the British Isles.

And crucially, the one thing we can be certain of is that the ideological diversity — the most important aspect of pluralism — will still be missing. Will there be mainstream voices, right-of-centre views or, dare we dream of it, even a conservative thought or two?

No. The ABC will continue to ignore the issue of intellectual diversity. It will continue to ignore its charter obligations to reflect this country rather than lecture it.

We will have every shade of Green Left host and journalist continuing to undermine and skew the work of the shrinking quota of objective professionals.


And as they wander the corridors of Southbank and Ultimo, they will never have to bother themselves with confronting mainstream, right-of-centre or conservative views except through antagonistic interviews and appearances by Institute of Public Affairs guests. Oh, and those awkward surprises sometimes dished up at the ballot box.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: ABC not biased?????

Post by freediver » Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:47 am

Following the controversy over the allocation of long term Senate seats, every single commercial media outlet failed to mention the 1998 and 2010 Senate resolutions in which Labor and the Coalition agreed to use the new recount method (they broke this promise). Only the ABC did. If a government owned outlet is the only one willing to report key facts that reflect badly on both major parties, that is a pretty good outcome for the ABC. I have compared the ABC online with the Australian on a few articles, and the Australian consistently mangles the facts in an effort to spin the article.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: ABC not biased?????

Post by Rorschach » Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:15 am

Yet the ABC since Whitlam has become more and more LW Progressive in staff and attitudes.

The ABC is supposed to be a non-biased national broadcaster... The Australian is no such thing.

Should I mention Fairfax or The Guardian etc... no... the topic is the ABC. :roll:
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: ABC not biased?????

Post by freediver » Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:31 pm

Maybe they are biased, but they are often the only outlet that can get the basic facts straight.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: ABC not biased?????

Post by Rorschach » Tue Oct 18, 2016 5:54 pm

freediver wrote:Maybe they are biased, but they are often the only outlet that can get the basic facts straight.
If they are biased then the facts are not straight or balanced or correct.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: ABC not biased?????

Post by IQS.RLOW » Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:04 pm

freediver wrote:Maybe they are biased, but they are often the only outlet that can get the basic facts straight.
They are staffed by and report purely on an extreme leftwing viewpoint.

The ABC holy trinity of reporting is
Globule warmening
Fag marriage
Illegal immigration.

Repeat adnauseum

They are a bunch of bed wetting lefty anarchists tax leeches.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: ABC not biased?????

Post by freediver » Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:05 pm

Rorschach wrote:
freediver wrote:Maybe they are biased, but they are often the only outlet that can get the basic facts straight.
If they are biased then the facts are not straight or balanced or correct.
Then I guess they are less biased than the other outlets, by a wide margin, and I am happy for the government to spend your money propping them up.

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: ABC not biased?????

Post by IQS.RLOW » Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:11 pm

freediver wrote:
Rorschach wrote:
freediver wrote:Maybe they are biased, but they are often the only outlet that can get the basic facts straight.
If they are biased then the facts are not straight or balanced or correct.
Then I guess they are less biased than the other outlets, by a wide margin, and I am happy for the government to spend your money propping them up.
Other outlets are allowed to be as biased as the market will bear. Which is why Fauxfacts has tanked.

Your bias blinds you to their bias.
The only cure for you is a frontal lobotomy.

Fuck theirALPBC
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: ABC not biased?????

Post by Rorschach » Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:19 pm

freediver wrote:
Rorschach wrote:
freediver wrote:Maybe they are biased, but they are often the only outlet that can get the basic facts straight.
If they are biased then the facts are not straight or balanced or correct.
Then I guess they are less biased than the other outlets, by a wide margin, and I am happy for the government to spend your money propping them up.
Oh don't assume I want to get rid of them I want them, I just want them to be unbiased and factual. They are a loooong way from that.
I do think we should sell SBS though.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: ABC not biased?????

Post by Rorschach » Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:14 am

Re refugees the ABC runs with anything and everything they are told that fits their PC bleeding heart LW Progressive attitudes. Those attitudes are fostered by its staff. You hire these political ideologues you get just their message.

Remember when Triggs claimed there were armed Guards on Nauru... A LIE.

The latest travesty from Amnesty, was yet again full of lies... film of facilities no longer in use on Nauru. Not to mention the very obviously coached children that fill the story.
ABC’s Four Corners slammed over old, selective Nauru footage
The ABC has endured excoriating criticism of its flagship current ­affairs program, Four Corners, after Monday’s episode about refugee children on Nauru was found to include old photographs of facilities no longer in use, and random footage of brawling adults, previously published on YouTube by a user known only as “NoRulz”.
Immigration Minister Peter Dutton last night accused the ABC of irresponsibility and said Four Corners had declined to use new photos and videos, offered by his office, of schools upgraded at a cost of $8.3 million.
The rundown hospital Four Corners showed.
The refurbished hospital it did not show.
“At the moment these advocates dressed up as journalists, frankly at the ABC and Guardian and some parts of Fairfax, are compounding these people’s problems because they are telling them ‘don’t accept settlement packages, don’t go back to your country of origin’ — even though hundreds of people before them have and many other people have been able to start a new life fresh,” Mr Dutton told Sky News.
The use of the punch-up ­footage attracted the ire of some ­Twitter users, including comedian Dave Hughes, who said: “Well done #FourCorners on using ­random YouTube clips of blokes punching on to imply every Nauru local is a sadistic animal. #ethical.”
In a statement, the Nauru government said the program did not seek its comment before broadcast, misrepresented facts and made “wild and unsubstantiated claims”. It said the program showed “incorrect pictures of schools in a deliberate attempt to misrepresent the facts”.
“If Nauruan schools are good enough for our children, why are they not for refugee children?” it asked.
Mr Sunderland said the report was balanced and complied with editorial policies but conceded he “didn’t believe” the ABC approached Nauru for comment for the story.
The Nauru government said: "There are fights in Australian schools on a daily basis (and) the Australian news shows acts of crime each night that are far more violent that anything Nauru has experienced.

“This report was an embarrassment to journalism. From start to finish it was denigrating, racist, false and pure political activism.”
The Four Corners program was based on an Amnesty International report that claims that Australia's regional processing regime on Nauru amounts to torture.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests