Seems that a few IT leaders are not happy with the US legislation apparently driven by Rupert Murdoch's lost copyrights sales and which are being modified in a bid to counter internet piracy.
Get with the times Rupy, you're riding a dinosaur
Will we survive without them being online for a moment or so.
Me thinks, of course.
Some may actually think that their world revolves around Twitter and Facebook - really they need to get a life!
And Wiki is getting an inflated ego about itself.
As for Google, which would be the most effective but that's not closing just adding a message. Guess the Google peeps need that advertising dollar even more than their "political stance"
4PM AEST will see what happens.
Yawn, will anyone even notice them.
"ONLINE encyclopedia Wikipedia will shut down its English language website at 4pm today (Melbourne time) to protest against anti-piracy legislation facing the US Congress.
The foundation behind the popular community-based encyclopedia said in a statement the dramatic 24-hour action would be taken because of serious concerns about the impact of the proposed laws on the concept of a free internet.
The unprecedented move brings added muscle to a growing base of critics of the legislation. Wikipedia is one of the internet's most popular websites, with millions of visitors daily.
"If passed, this legislation will harm the free and open internet and bring about new tools for censorship of international websites inside the United States," the Wikimedia foundation said.
The Stop Online Piracy Act in the US House of Representatives and the Protect Intellectual Property Act under consideration in the Senate are designed to crack down on sales of pirated US products overseas.
Supporters include the film and music industry, which often sees its products sold illegally. They say the legislation is needed to protect intellectual property and jobs.
Critics say the legislation could hurt the technology industry and infringe on free-speech rights. Among their concerns are provisions that would weaken cyber-security for companies and hinder domain access rights.
The most controversial provision is in the House bill, which would have enabled federal authorities to "blacklist" sites that are alleged to distribute pirated content. That would essentially cut off portions of the internet to all US users. But congressional leaders appear to be backing off this provision.
Tech companies such as Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Twitter, eBay, AOL and others have spoken out against the legislation and said it threatens the industry's livelihood. Several online communities such as Reddit, Boing Boing and others have announced plans to go dark in protest as well.
Google will not go dark, but will add a protest link to its homepage in support of the cause.
The Obama administration also raised concerns about the legislation over the weekend and said it will work with congress on legislation to help battle piracy and counterfeiting while defending free expression, privacy, security and innovation in the internet.
Wikipedia's decision to go dark brings the issue into a much brighter spotlight. A group of Wikipedia users have discussed for more than a month whether it should react to the legislation.
Over the past few days, a group of more than 1800 volunteers who work on the site and other users considered several forms of online protest, including banner ads and a global blackout of the site, the foundation said. Ultimately, the group supported the decision to black out the English version of the site.
Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia who first announced the move on his Twitter account on Monday, said the bills are a threat to the free, open, and secure web.
"The whole thing is just a poorly designed mess," Wales said in an email to The Associated Press.
Wikipedia is also requesting that readers contact members of congress about the bill during the blackout.
"I am personally asking everyone who cares about freedom and openness on the internet to contact their senators and representative," Wales said. "One of the things we have learned recently during the Arab Spring events is that the internet is a powerfully effective tool for the public to organise and have their voices heard."
This is the first time Wikipedia's English version has gone dark. Its Italian site came down once briefly in protest to an internet censorship bill put forward by the Berlusconi government; the bill did not advance.
"Wikipedia is about being open," said Jay Walsh, spokesman for the Wikimedia foundation. "We are not about shutting down and protesting. It's not a muscle that is normally flexed."
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/technology/ ... 6247231102
Wiki, Twitter, Facebook & Google Boycott
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
- Bart
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:51 am
Wiki, Twitter, Facebook & Google Boycott
Women...if they had brains they'd be men
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests