Novak Djokovic is being deported.

Discuss sport related and outdoor activities here
Post Reply
Prime Minister for Canyons
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2021 10:45 am

Re: Djokovic has lost the case.

Post by Prime Minister for Canyons » Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am

Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:09 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:07 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:04 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 10:57 am


I said -
mRNA vaccines have only been around for 1 year or a bit longer.
They were still testing them 2 years ago.

Therefore we have only at the most 2 years of data about mRNA Covid vaccines but
40 years of data for Adenovirus type vaccines such as AstraZeneca.

mRNA is not proven in the long term as being safe to use.
The Govt. has lied to you.

Lipid nanoparticles have been used for many years on different products, DOXIL has been in use since 1995. Human trials of mRNA vaccines have been since 2011.

They have been proven, you're just an idiot.

But lets go on that, how do you think they are not safe? What mechanism involving the technology do you think is unsafe?
First I ever heard of that after 1000s of hours of reading about it.
First you've heard of lipid nanoparticles being used in cancer treatments in 1995?
No -
first I've heard of an mRNA vaccine from 2011.

I said trials and it was for cancer vaccines. And obviously your 1000s of hours of reading are crap, cause it took me all of about 4 seconds to find a decent reference https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 0%2C%2011).

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18278
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Djokovic has lost the case.

Post by Bobby » Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:13 am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:09 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:07 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:04 am



Lipid nanoparticles have been used for many years on different products, DOXIL has been in use since 1995. Human trials of mRNA vaccines have been since 2011.

They have been proven, you're just an idiot.

But lets go on that, how do you think they are not safe? What mechanism involving the technology do you think is unsafe?
First I ever heard of that after 1000s of hours of reading about it.
First you've heard of lipid nanoparticles being used in cancer treatments in 1995?
No -
first I've heard of an mRNA vaccine from 2011.

I said trials and it was for cancer vaccines.
So when you wrote
Human trials of mRNA vaccines have been since 2011.
it was bullshit?

Prime Minister for Canyons
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2021 10:45 am

Re: Djokovic has lost the case.

Post by Prime Minister for Canyons » Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:15 am

Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:13 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:09 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:07 am


First I ever heard of that after 1000s of hours of reading about it.
First you've heard of lipid nanoparticles being used in cancer treatments in 1995?
No -
first I've heard of an mRNA vaccine from 2011.

I said trials and it was for cancer vaccines.
So when you wrote
Human trials of mRNA vaccines have been since 2011.
it was bullshit?


Ummm, no. Human trials of mRNA vaccines have been since 2011 includes the statement it was trials and it was for cancer vaccines.

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18278
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Djokovic has lost the case.

Post by Bobby » Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:15 am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:09 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:07 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:04 am



Lipid nanoparticles have been used for many years on different products, DOXIL has been in use since 1995. Human trials of mRNA vaccines have been since 2011.

They have been proven, you're just an idiot.

But lets go on that, how do you think they are not safe? What mechanism involving the technology do you think is unsafe?
First I ever heard of that after 1000s of hours of reading about it.
First you've heard of lipid nanoparticles being used in cancer treatments in 1995?
No -
first I've heard of an mRNA vaccine from 2011.

I said trials and it was for cancer vaccines. And obviously your 1000s of hours of reading are crap, cause it took me all of about 4 seconds to find a decent reference https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 0%2C%2011).

But no vaccines for virus control in 2011.

Apologise for telling lies.

Prime Minister for Canyons
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2021 10:45 am

Re: Djokovic has lost the case.

Post by Prime Minister for Canyons » Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:16 am

Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:15 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:09 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:07 am


First I ever heard of that after 1000s of hours of reading about it.
First you've heard of lipid nanoparticles being used in cancer treatments in 1995?
No -
first I've heard of an mRNA vaccine from 2011.

I said trials and it was for cancer vaccines. And obviously your 1000s of hours of reading are crap, cause it took me all of about 4 seconds to find a decent reference https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 0%2C%2011).

But no vaccines for virus control in 2011.

Apologise for telling lies.


Vaccines are vaccines, a mRNA vaccine for a cancer works has the same mechanism of action as a mRNA vaccine for a virus.

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18278
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Djokovic has lost the case.

Post by Bobby » Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:34 am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:16 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:15 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:09 am


First you've heard of lipid nanoparticles being used in cancer treatments in 1995?
No -
first I've heard of an mRNA vaccine from 2011.

I said trials and it was for cancer vaccines. And obviously your 1000s of hours of reading are crap, cause it took me all of about 4 seconds to find a decent reference https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 0%2C%2011).

But no vaccines for virus control in 2011.

Apologise for telling lies.


Vaccines are vaccines, a mRNA vaccine for a cancer works has the same mechanism of action as a mRNA vaccine for a virus.

But no vaccines for virus control in 2011.

apologise.

Prime Minister for Canyons
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2021 10:45 am

Re: Djokovic has lost the case.

Post by Prime Minister for Canyons » Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:45 am

Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:34 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:16 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:15 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:11 am


No -
first I've heard of an mRNA vaccine from 2011.

I said trials and it was for cancer vaccines. And obviously your 1000s of hours of reading are crap, cause it took me all of about 4 seconds to find a decent reference https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 0%2C%2011).

But no vaccines for virus control in 2011.

Apologise for telling lies.


Vaccines are vaccines, a mRNA vaccine for a cancer works has the same mechanism of action as a mRNA vaccine for a virus.

But no vaccines for virus control in 2011.

apologise.


No because you are dealing with semantics that are irrelevant to the science involved. A mRNA vaccine to cancer works in exactly the same way to a mRNA vaccine to a virus using exactly the same technology.


In all of your supposed 1000s of hours of reading how have you not grasped this simple point.

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18278
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Djokovic has lost the case.

Post by Bobby » Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:47 am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:45 am

No because you are dealing with semantics that are irrelevant to the science involved. A mRNA vaccine to cancer works in exactly the same way to a mRNA vaccine to a virus using exactly the same technology.

In all of your supposed 1000s of hours of reading how have you not grasped this simple point.
Stop being an idiot.
Killing off cancer cells and killing a virus is completely different.

Apologise for bullshitting and wasting my time.
I was right.

Prime Minister for Canyons
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2021 10:45 am

Re: Djokovic has lost the case.

Post by Prime Minister for Canyons » Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:49 am

Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:47 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:45 am

No because you are dealing with semantics that are irrelevant to the science involved. A mRNA vaccine to cancer works in exactly the same way to a mRNA vaccine to a virus using exactly the same technology.

In all of your supposed 1000s of hours of reading how have you not grasped this simple point.
Stop being an idiot.
Killing off cancer cells and killing a virus is completely different.

Apologise for bullshitting and wasting my time.
I was right.

If you're planning on using the immune system to do the killing, its exactly the same. Getting the immune system to recognise what you want killed.

In all of your supposed 1000s of hours of reading how have you not grasped this simple point.

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 18278
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Djokovic has lost the case.

Post by Bobby » Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:52 am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:49 am
Bobby wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:47 am
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote:
Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:45 am

No because you are dealing with semantics that are irrelevant to the science involved. A mRNA vaccine to cancer works in exactly the same way to a mRNA vaccine to a virus using exactly the same technology.

In all of your supposed 1000s of hours of reading how have you not grasped this simple point.
Stop being an idiot.
Killing off cancer cells and killing a virus is completely different.

Apologise for bullshitting and wasting my time.
I was right.

If you're planning on using the immune system to do the killing, its exactly the same. Getting the immune system to recognise what you want killed.

In all of your supposed 1000s of hours of reading how have you not grasped this simple point.
Apologise.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests