I disagree.Black Orchid wrote:I would say it was obvious to most people Brian.brian ross wrote:It may be obvious to you, BO but it is not obvious to me or anybody else who reads the words they have typed. Now is it?
To be biased is correct
- brian ross
- Posts: 6059
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm
Re: To be biased is correct
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair
-
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 6:57 pm
Re: To be biased is correct
Brian has the gall to ask this question on another thread:
ANSWER THE QUESTION!
For the third time now, mate:Why are you avoiding answering the question, mate?
If you don't answer my question, you are debating with neither honesty nor integrity. As Hebert would say:So is it equally correct for me to say, "Many Muslims (not all though) are invariably terrorists"?
Is it also equally correct for me to say, "Many little old ladies in twin sets (not all though) are invaribly terrorists"?
Is none, one, or both of those statements correct, Brian?
ANSWER THE QUESTION!
- boxy
- Posts: 6748
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm
Re: To be biased is correct
It's natural and instinctive. That doesn't necessarily make it correct or useful in all situations.sprintcyclist wrote:To be biased and prejudicial is correct, self protective, normal and sensible.
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."
-
- Posts: 7007
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm
Re: To be biased is correct
oh no, it is not correct in all situations at all.boxy wrote:It's natural and instinctive. That doesn't necessarily make it correct or useful in all situations.sprintcyclist wrote:To be biased and prejudicial is correct, self protective, normal and sensible.
Nothing is.
Right Wing is the Natural Progression.
- BigP
- Posts: 4970
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:56 pm
Re: To be biased is correct
"""But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."""
Really ? I will chew your chimp like fingers off
Really ? I will chew your chimp like fingers off
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: To be biased is correct
Boxy is OK ... I guess he has been busy but he is an OLD (long time) PA Member and used to be the Admin here. He doesn't like Aussie either.BigP wrote:"""But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."""
Really ? I will chew your chimp like fingers off
- brian ross
- Posts: 6059
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm
Re: To be biased is correct
I have, "Nicole". You just don't like the answer you were given. Tough.Mistress Nicole wrote:Brian has the gall to ask this question on another thread:For the third time now, mate:Why are you avoiding answering the question, mate?
If you don't answer my question, you are debating with neither honesty nor integrity. As Hebert would say:So is it equally correct for me to say, "Many Muslims (not all though) are invariably terrorists"?
Is it also equally correct for me to say, "Many little old ladies in twin sets (not all though) are invaribly terrorists"?
Is none, one, or both of those statements correct, Brian?
ANSWER THE QUESTION!
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: To be biased is correct
Ah yes another of bwian's typical responses.
So bwian you are biased and you always think you are correct....
So bwian you are biased and you always think you are correct....
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
-
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 6:57 pm
Re: To be biased is correct
Sorry I have clearly missed your answer. Can you repost the post where you have answered the above?brian ross wrote:I have, "Nicole". You just don't like the answer you were given. Tough.Mistress Nicole wrote:Brian has the gall to ask this question on another thread:For the third time now, mate:Why are you avoiding answering the question, mate?
If you don't answer my question, you are debating with neither honesty nor integrity. As Hebert would say:So is it equally correct for me to say, "Many Muslims (not all though) are invariably terrorists"?
Is it also equally correct for me to say, "Many little old ladies in twin sets (not all though) are invaribly terrorists"?
Is none, one, or both of those statements correct, Brian?
ANSWER THE QUESTION!
TIA.
Nic
-
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 6:57 pm
Re: To be biased is correct
This is a typical cut and run Brian Ross tactic. When he gets backed into a corner, he avoids, disappears, then pops up on another thread sprouting the same crap.Mistress Nicole wrote:Sorry I have clearly missed your answer. Can you repost the post where you have answered the above?brian ross wrote:I have, "Nicole". You just don't like the answer you were given. Tough.Mistress Nicole wrote:Brian has the gall to ask this question on another thread:For the third time now, mate:Why are you avoiding answering the question, mate?
If you don't answer my question, you are debating with neither honesty nor integrity. As Hebert would say:So is it equally correct for me to say, "Many Muslims (not all though) are invariably terrorists"?
Is it also equally correct for me to say, "Many little old ladies in twin sets (not all though) are invaribly terrorists"?
Is none, one, or both of those statements correct, Brian?
ANSWER THE QUESTION!
TIA.
Nic
Disappointing, but to form.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests