Media Legislation

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: Media Legislation

Post by mantra » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:34 pm

The debate was going quite well Roach until you started with the expletives. In actual fact - you rarely have anything relevant to say simply because you know nothing apart from a small pile of naughty boy words.

Speak civilly to the members if you're capable of it and the debate won't get waylaid.

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Media Legislation

Post by Rorschach » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:01 pm

Funnily enough I only use expletives with idiots and when people like you "gang up" on me.

Don't be an idiot and I won't use them.

Don't waylay the debate and I won't use them.

Don't crap on and lie and I won't use them.

you should already know that.

Mind you I don't recall any expletives being used, just a fashion label.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Aussie

Re: Media Legislation

Post by Aussie » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:42 pm

Oi Roachy Poachy Puddin 'n Pie...............surely you aren't running away like a coward are you? I posted this:
Yeaaaaas....I have read and re-read and re-read all of that, and nowhere does melbart fail to appreciate who is the Minister and who is the Shadow Minister, and no-where does she deny the right of Turnbull to speak about this Legislation. She did make the obvious point, if Abbott wins in September, that does not mean Turnbull will become the Minister for Communications etc.

So, over to Roachy Poachy Puddin 'n Pie......show us all where?
We can all see your lack of response!

:oops :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Media Legislation

Post by Rorschach » Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:30 pm

Just stop talking for everyone else you myopic moron.

Plain as the nose on your face Gunga.
Get an English interpreter to 'splain things to you.
Like I said I ain't gonna repost with notes for you.

Image
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Aussie

Re: Media Legislation

Post by Aussie » Tue Mar 19, 2013 6:46 pm

No need to re-post anything Roachy Poachy Puddin 'n Pie......just show us where melbart did not understand that Turnbull was a Shadow Minister and where she denied his right to comment on the Legislation? Pssssssst.............I know you can't, because she didn't. You built a classic strawman, something you regularly accuse others of doing.

You really are shit at this, but I know you have no idea just how really shit you are.

:oops :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

;)

Image

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Media Legislation

Post by Rorschach » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:14 pm

i already told you dumbass... I see you are showing your tendency to not have an original idea again. :rofl :rofl :rofl

Oh and BTW mel's anti-Turnbull rant to me didn't start on this topic.

Do try to keep up. :roll:

i'm sorry you find ENGLISH so difficult.
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Aussie

Re: Media Legislation

Post by Aussie » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:23 pm

Rorschach wrote:i already told you dumbass... I see you are showing your tendency to not have an original idea again. :rofl :rofl :rofl

Oh and BTW mel's anti-Turnbull rant to me didn't start on this topic.

Do try to keep up. :roll:
You have not shown where melbart did not understand that Turnbull was a Shadow Minister, or that she did not accept he was entitled to speak on this issue. Further, she correctly pointed out that, if Abbott is elected as PM, Turnbull may not be the Minister.

You have a credibility issue here, Roachy Poachy Puddin 'n Pie. I reckon that is 'strike three.'

Image

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Media Legislation

Post by mellie » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:32 pm

Aussie wrote:Oi Roachy Poachy Puddin 'n Pie...............surely you aren't running away like a coward are you? I posted this:
Yeaaaaas....I have read and re-read and re-read all of that, and nowhere does melbart fail to appreciate who is the Minister and who is the Shadow Minister, and no-where does she deny the right of Turnbull to speak about this Legislation. She did make the obvious point, if Abbott wins in September, that does not mean Turnbull will become the Minister for Communications etc.

So, over to Roachy Poachy Puddin 'n Pie......show us all where?
We can all see your lack of response!

:oops :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

Thanks Aussie, and it appears our resident Roach has jumped the gun, yet again, ho-hum..sigh, I was merely stating a fact, the fact being that just because Turncoat is shadow communications minister pre-election, isn't to say he's guaranteed the communications portfolio should the coalition win the election.

I for one would like to see Tony Abbott ditch the opportunistic self-interested traitor, he cant be trusted and he's too occupied with his own 'investments' to manage a portfolio that he's probably already invested in, some how or another anyway, recall how Malcolm Turnbull kindly gave a grant of $10million to Matt Handbury, chairman and part owner of the so called Australian Rain Corporation, beneficiary of the Minister’s funding?

http://usahitman.com/leaked-weather-mod ... -document/



He doesn't muck around. 8-)

He'd have his fingers in the roll-out of the NBN too, some how or another.... you mark my words...and that's why he's so keen to get it up and running.

Malcolm is all about Malcolm.

The problem is his greed, I worry his own private Malcolm portfolio will undermine the integrity of the Liberal party, even before its formed a government.

And even before he himself has been awarded the portfolio of Communications Minister.

Whilst it's true, Abbott has hinted towards the possibility of Turnbull being handed the portfolio...."hinted" much can happen between then and now, especially when it comes to Malcolm Turnbull.
Turnbull to visit Bendigo and debate NBN issues
March 19, 2013, 1 a.m.

BENDIGO’S NBN network and media reform laws will be discussed when opposition communications and broadband spokesman Malcolm Turnbull visits this month.



On Tuesday, March 26, Mr Turnbull will speak at The Capital theatre, where he will outline the opposition’s plan before answering questions from the floor.

“These local issues are well worth debating and Mr Turnbull is keen to put the record straight,” Bendigo Business Council’s Patrick Falconer said.

Tickets are available for $40 for BBC members and $55 for non-members. To book, call 5442 7816 or email admin@bendigobusinesscouncil.com.au before 5pm on March 22.

http://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/sto ... ues/?cs=80

Why don't you attend Roach?

If you fancy him so much?

Theres more to Malcolm than his communications portfolio ambitions.

;)

User avatar
Rorschach
Posts: 14801
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Media Legislation

Post by Rorschach » Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:05 pm

Your still a moron
You should read what people write before making a goose of yourself. :rofl :rofl :rofl
never been a strength of yours though has it mel? :roll:
DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD

Aussie

Re: Media Legislation

Post by Aussie » Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:15 pm

Roachy Poachy Puddin 'n Pie wrote:
Your still a moron
You should read what people write before making a goose of yourself.
Gotta luuurve the 'your,' when you reckon English is my second language.

:oops :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

I wrote:
You have not shown where melbart did not understand that Turnbull was a Shadow Minister, or that she did not accept he was entitled to speak on this issue. Further, she correctly pointed out that, if Abbott is elected as PM, Turnbull may not be the Minister.

You have a credibility issue here, Roachy Poachy Puddin 'n Pie. I reckon that is 'strike three.'
And you still have not produced the goods. Your credibility is under serious threat here Roachy Poachy Puddin 'n Pie. Show us where melbart did not understand that Turnbull was a Shadow Minister, or that she did not accept he was entitled to speak on this issue.

Also please explain where she was wrong in saying that, if Abbott is elected as PM, Turnbull may not be the Minister.

;)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests