Labor face disaster if........

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
harry climber

Re: Labor face disaster if........

Post by harry climber » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:41 am

Viking King. wrote: And history also shows that your kind of response is just typlical of pillow biters, Scream when the tax is too much.

Would that mean that ALP voters remain silent when the tax is too much?

Viking King.

Re: Labor face disaster if........

Post by Viking King. » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:52 am

harry climber wrote:
Viking King. wrote: And history also shows that your kind of response is just typlical of pillow biters, Scream when the tax is too much.

Would that mean that ALP voters remain silent when the tax is too much?
Read again harry, big problem between big rich fellow and Mr Manual Labor is this,
Mr Big can waste money on the best accountants to reduce how much he/she pays in tax,
we've all heard of it, "Nth Shore millionaires claim they only earned $20,000?"
whereas the little fellow has trouble paying $125 to just get the return lodged then he gets nothing back because Mr Big didn't pay any tax so the system has to get it back somewhere, who do they take it from?
Mr Manual Labor!
Meanwhile Manual Labor is working 12 hr shifts to earn a bit more, his tax then jumps up to 48%, so where is the incentice to keep working? Then Mr Big is doing 3 days a week at the office looking out the window on the 27th floor thinking about the holiday the company will pay for, Manual Labor no longer gets holidays because Mr Big has a piece of paper made up by the Lib gov't saying he can cut costs by reducing the fulltime workers and making the casuals therefore no holidays need to be covered for the workers, after 18mths Manual Labor wants to have 2 weeks holiday that he struggled to save for, Mr Big says "If you can't be at work you don't have a job"

harry climber

Re: Labor face disaster if........

Post by harry climber » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:54 am

Viking King. wrote:
harry climber wrote:
Viking King. wrote: And history also shows that your kind of response is just typlical of pillow biters, Scream when the tax is too much.

Would that mean that ALP voters remain silent when the tax is too much?
Read again harry, big problem between big rich fellow and Mr Manual Labor is this,
Mr Big can waste money on the best accountants to reduce how much he/she pays in tax,
we've all heard of it, "Nth Shore millionaires claim they only earned $20,000?"
whereas the little fellow has trouble paying $125 to just get the return lodged then he gets nothing back because Mr Big didn't pay any tax so the system has to get it back somewhere, who do they take it from?
Mr Manual Labor!
Meanwhile Manual Labor is working 12 hr shifts to earn a bit more, his tax then jumps up to 48%, so where is the incentice to keep working? Then Mr Big is doing 3 days a week at the office looking out the window on the 27th floor thinking about the holiday the company will pay for, Manual Labor no longer gets holidays because Mr Big has a piece of paper made up by the Lib gov't saying he can cut costs by reducing the fulltime workers and making the casuals therefore no holidays need to be covered for the workers, after 18mths Manual Labor wants to have 2 weeks holiday that he struggled to save for, Mr Big says "If you can't be at work you don't have a job"
Would that mean that ALP voters remain silent when the tax is too much?
So is that a Yes or a No?

User avatar
IQS.RLOW
Posts: 19345
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Quote Aussie: nigger

Re: Labor face disaster if........

Post by IQS.RLOW » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:54 am

You suck at analogies
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia

Leftwinger
Posts: 357
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:43 pm

Re: Labor face disaster if........

Post by Leftwinger » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:13 pm

Dear Wankalot,
Spot on description of IQ there Viking King :) And of that other clown as well.

Not much point continuing I think. Arguing logic with a lib fanboi is like trying to argue to a fanatical suicide bomber that blowing themselves and a bunch of other people up is not going to see them miraculously transported to a paradise with 12 virgins and all the rest of it. Might as well let them keep wanking on, they're going to anyway.

Viking King.

Re: Labor face disaster if........

Post by Viking King. » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:15 pm

This is the last line of the piece I wrote, the piece you refer to but don't seem to notice;
Do you really believe that the average worker Mr Manual Labor wants to pay more tax when he is struggling to save $5 ?
Does this mean you libs only look at particular words and not the full line?
Yes it does, same with the Lib party in opposition, always bringing up past subjects from 10 and 15 yrs ago,
yet you lot in here say we learn nothing from the past I when I do it,
if you don't learn from the past there is no future, and that is where the Lib party fails, they don't look at what went wrong, they just go ahead and do what they want to do and stuff the results.
Howard did say and said it with pride, "We are not here to do what you want"
"If you don't like what we have done then vote us out"
Have you worked out why they lost the election?
No,,, it's because they had no idea of how to fight the global recession that was around the corner, they knew it was coming and chose to get out.

harry climber

Re: Labor face disaster if........

Post by harry climber » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:16 pm

harry climber wrote:
Would that mean that ALP voters remain silent when the tax is too much?
So is that a Yes or a No?

Viking King.

Re: Labor face disaster if........

Post by Viking King. » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:19 pm

Leftwinger wrote:
Dear Wankalot,
Spot on description of IQ there Viking King :) And of that other clown as well.

Not much point continuing I think. Arguing logic with a lib fanboi is like trying to argue to a fanatical suicide bomber that blowing themselves and a bunch of other people up is not going to see them miraculously transported to a paradise with 12 virgins and all the rest of it. Might as well let them keep wanking on, they're going to anyway.
So true so true so true,
They seem to only see light in the tunnel where they strike the match,
they only look at one side, I have been on both sides as a member and an ind, I got sick of it all and got out, but hey, I got my pension payout each time I left the office, (3 times) and thanks to IQ and his follies, I am glad to take his money.

Pastafarian
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:55 am

Re: Labor face disaster if........

Post by Pastafarian » Mon Apr 11, 2011 10:21 am

Based on his climate change antics, (not questioning the debate, just the contribution Andrew makes to it) I've learnt to just assume everything Bolt writes is poorly researched biased rubbish.
The Mayans predicted the end of the world in December 2012, but they didn't see the Spanish coming

Jovial Monk

Re: Labor face disaster if........

Post by Jovial Monk » Mon Apr 11, 2011 10:43 am

Pastafarian wrote:Based on his climate change antics, (not questioning the debate, just the contribution Andrew makes to it) I've learnt to just assume everything Bolt writes is poorly researched biased rubbish.
That would be 100% correct I reckon!

England has a cold winter means—no global warming full stop! Effect on Gulf Stream of all that melting Arctic/Greenland ice—Andy wouldn’t know what it is. NE America gets hit with blizzards/snowstorms means—no global warming full stop! has he heard Canada is having quite warm winters, with the pine bark beetle able to over winter in huge numbers wreaking havoc on the confifer forests? Andy wouldn’t have a fucking clue! Those pinebark beetles of course are one of those tipping points. I have also seen him misread graphs etc.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests