Evolution is not a scientific theory

[Super Nova]

Well I never understood your argument beyond short statements dropping terms in and a unicorn.


I will get back to you.

I'm off for the weekend here in sunny England.

[Neferti]

Well I never understood your argument beyond short statements dropping terms in and a unicorn.


I will get back to you.

I'm off for the weekend here in sunny England.

OFF TOPIC ...

I hear that the Poms are doing what they do best .... whinge. This time about the Olympics. They are scared it will be a failure and they won't win any Gold so are blaming everything except the inclement weather that MAY happen while the Games are on .... apparently athletes may have to perform in the rain. LOL When are you going to get the heatwave when temps get to 28C over there?

[Super Nova]

OFF TOPIC ...

I hear that the Poms are doing what they do best .... whinge. This time about the Olympics. They are scared it will be a failure and they won't win any Gold so are blaming everything except the inclement weather that MAY happen while the Games are on .... apparently athletes may have to perform in the rain. LOL When are you going to get the heatwave when temps get to 28C over there?

They are such a negative bunch. They are whinging about everthing. There is going to be a heat wave this week. It may hit 28C. My god... people will start dying.

The G4S company that couldn't recruit all the security needed so the army has been called in. Big political issue of the week.

Complaining about the change in traffic timings and special Olympic lanes causing traffic problems. It sucks at the best of times. The M4 being closed due to an old over pass starting to have structural faults.

A bus driver took the wrong turn and it took the Aussie 4 hours to get to their Olympic housing.

Bitch and complain... it is the Pommy way. They are getting behind the Olympics, they just love a good whinge.

[Super Nova]

Evolution has been expressed in "mathematical" terms.

They are using this to predict cancer.

Evolution as a theory has models that produce predictable results and now these models will be used as the bases for more advanced models and some real opportunities in fighting cancer.

Experts believe that they can use the mathematics of evolution to predict the spread of the disease – and thereby treat it far more effectively. The idea, published in the journal Nature, is the brainchild of two major figures. One, Bert Vogelstein of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, is the most cited scientist in the world, and an expert in the mutations that cancer cells undergo. The other, Martin Nowak of Harvard University in Massachusetts, has a distinguished record in putting biology on a mathematical basis (as outlined in our co-written book, SuperCooperators).

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/roge ... ancer.html

[freediver]

natural selection

Any luck figuring out what your argument is? Or is it easier to just google articles that appear to be relevant?

[Neferti]

natural selection

Any luck figuring out what your argument is? Or is it easier to just google articles that appear to be relevant?

[Super Nova]

natural selection

Any luck figuring out what your argument is? Or is it easier to just google articles that appear to be relevant?

Yep,

I argue that Evolution is a Scientific Theory. I present papers and views and even evidence that it is.

You argue it's not by saying it's not falsifiable, I have shown it is.
You just throw in a Unicorn, make a statement, walk away.

We might as well be arguing about god.

[freediver]

What point is there in presenting 'evidence' if you don't come up with the argument first? You have presented the same apparent argument about a dozen times, though it is hardly clear what you are trying to say because you always copy and paste someone else's words without knowing what they mean. Each time I patently point out the flaws, and you respond by copying and pasting a different version of the same argument. Copying and pasting is not a substitute for thinking.

[Super Nova]

What point is there in presenting 'evidence' if you don't come up with the argument first? You have presented the same apparent argument about a dozen times, though it is hardly clear what you are trying to say because you always copy and paste someone else's words without knowing what they mean. Each time I patently point out the flaws, and you respond by copying and pasting a different version of the same argument. Copying and pasting is not a substitute for thinking.

I get your point.

Let me think about that......

[Aussie]

It amazes me why you even discuss this shit. Wake me and the rest of the World when you have the answer.