Is that it? ... That's all you've got? ... Shit, even the material you eventually posted doesn't support the "No Global Warming for 18 years" claim.IQS.RLOW wrote:So now youre side stepping and moving the posts eh?
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=4321" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NASA Study Finds Earth's Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed
Just because it doesnt accord with your religious convictions.
Now go suck off a smelly hippie, swampy.
Youve been thoroughly pwn3d.
NASA Study Finds Earth's Ocean Abyss Has Not Warmed
Deep sea creatures, like these anemones at a hydrothermal vent, are not yet feeling the heat from global climate change. Although the top half of the ocean continues to warm, the bottom half has not increased measurably in temperature in the last decade.
The cold waters of Earth's deep ocean have not warmed measurably since 2005, according to a new NASA study, leaving unsolved the mystery of why global warming appears to have slowed in recent years.
Scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean temperature data from 2005 to 2013 and found the ocean abyss below 1.24 miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably. Study coauthor Josh Willis of JPL said these findings do not throw suspicion on climate change itself.
"The sea level is still rising," Willis noted. "We're just trying to understand the nitty-gritty details."
Here's what you were claiming.Outlaw Yogi wrote:Righto Goober, I'm calling you out on this.IQS.RLOW wrote:This has been debunked a couple of times in this very thread. Why do you deny the science that says the missing heat is not in the fucking oceans, you stupid moonbat.The British Met Office claims it said no such thing and agrees with the NOAA claim that the planet has continued to warm, the 10 hottest years on record are since 1998, and that some of the warming has been absorbed by the Pacific Ocean, and in turn raised the temp of the Pacific Ocean.
If what you say is factual, you should have no trouble nominating which agency, authority or institution has done what you claim.
Note it must be a science based org, not the church of psychotic hypocrites or scientology ect.
And it must have a link or references to the org and info for it to be credible.
I reckon you'll fail this test and just squeal a volley of obscenities because you don't have the intellect or fortitude to do otherwise.
C'mon IQ, I'm challenging your integrity and credibility here. Defend your honour so I have to apologise or become my whipping boy til I die.
I told you it had been debunked. NASA tells you it has been debunked and you still prefer your religion rather than facts, swampy.and that some of the warming has been absorbed by the Pacific Ocean, and in turn raised the temp of the Pacific Ocean.
A MATHEMATICAL discovery by Perth-based electrical engineer Dr David Evans may change everything about the climate debate, on the eve of the UN climate change conference in Paris next month.
A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.
Much more on the Jonova site.“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.
Dr Evans says his discovery “ought to change the world”.
“But the political obstacles are massive,” he said.
His discovery explains why none of the climate models used by the IPCC reflect the evidence of recorded temperatures. The models have failed to predict the pause in global warming which has been going on for 18 years and counting.
“The model architecture was wrong,” he says. “Carbon dioxide causes only minor warming. The climate is largely driven by factors outside our control.”
There is another problem with the original climate model, which has been around since 1896.
While climate scientists have been predicting since the 1990s that changes in temperature would follow changes in carbon dioxide, the records over the past half million years show that not to be the case.
So you are ignoring his credentials too I seeSuper Nova wrote:If Dr Evans is correct, then he has proven the theory on carbon dioxide wrong and blown a hole in climate alarmism. He will have explained why the doomsday predictions of climate scientists aren’t reflected in the actual temperatures.
Well we know the models need refinement. If they are architecturally wrong... well....where's my hat... i'm hungry.
Let's see how this goes in peer review. I do not believe the scientific community is corrupt and will ignore this work if it stands up. I expect to see this be covered beyond the Perth media in days.
When it is completed his work will be published as two scientific papers. Both papers are undergoing peer review.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests