The Unions in Australia

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: The Unions in Australia

Post by brian ross » Mon Jan 06, 2020 9:04 pm

Black Orchid wrote:
Mon Jan 06, 2020 9:02 pm
brian ross wrote:
Mon Jan 06, 2020 9:00 pm
Black Orchid wrote:
Mon Jan 06, 2020 8:42 pm
brian ross wrote:
Mon Jan 06, 2020 8:30 pm
Black Orchid wrote:
Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:12 pm
I wouldn't place too much faith in Dr Peter Stanley. Talk about dubious research! :roll:
Having met Dr. Peter Stanley several times, I have a great deal more faith in his historical understanding than that of a fellow like Peter Bowen. Peter Stanley was the head historian at the War Memorial. He was also head historian at the Australian Museum. He has a great record of historical works behind him. Much more than Peter Bowen or Hal Colebatch, :roll :roll
Stanley has a great number of dubious false claims to his name so no wonder you revere him. Whether you have met him or not is irrelevant and inconsequential. He is a revisionist like yourself.
And Peter Bowen? What is he? How about Hal Colebatch? What do they base their claims on, Black Orchid? Mmmm?

Peter Stanley is a revisionist. All real historians are. It is how our knowledge of history is created. It doesn't just spring forth, fully formed, you realise? It has to be created, revised, recreated. Sometimes even discarded. :roll
You mean it has to be made up to suit? :rofl
In your case, yes. Black Orchid, I'd say a definitive yes. :roll
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

cods
Posts: 6433
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:52 am

Re: The Unions in Australia

Post by cods » Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:54 am

My own experience with unions has been generally good. I don't doubt you've never been a member of a union, right, Bogan. How unsurprising. :roll:
Nationalis


I have bri... and they did bugger all for me...oh wait a minute they did up my membership fees EVERY YEAR

User avatar
Bogan
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:27 pm

Re: The Unions in Australia

Post by Bogan » Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:56 am

Briney wrote

No denying that the wharfies were generally difficult to work with, Bogan. However, that was generally because those that attempted to dictate to them how they should work had never worked a hard day's work in their lives. Unloading or loading ships was generally done before the 1970s by hand, on the backs of workers. Workers who had a hard life and were often injured or worse, killed during those duties.
It was nowhere near as hard as walking over the Owen Stanley's, living in a slit trench, and getting shot at and shelled by mortars and artillery. When well paid, striking coal miners in the USA went on strike during wartime, FDR had the perfect solution. He had most of them conscripted and sent to the infantry.
Brian wrote

Wharfies weren't willing to work superfast when they were dealing with cargoes that they had little previous experience with. Outsiders didn't appreciate that and demanded they worker harder, faster when it was dangerous to do so. When handling explosives and vehicles, extreme caution was needed. The military was often called in but found that they lacked the skills to accomplish the tasks set for them, without the help of the Wharfies.
Brian, according to Hal Colbech's book, they had no trouble loading explosives, provided that they received extortionate "danger money". The situation of Australian wharfies refusing to load desperately needed supplies was so bad that the Curtin government routinely used the Soviet ambassador in Canberra to lecture the wharfies on how much the supplies were needed to fight fascism. One wonders at what the Soviet ambassador thought of doing that? In the USSR, if their wharfies had behaved like that, they would have been taken to the nearest wall and summarily shot by firing squad.

In Darwin, the authorities figured out that the best way to get the Darwin wharfies to work was to make sure that the arriving beer supplies were at the very bottom of the ship loading.
Brian Ross wrote

After the introduction of containerisation, generally the wharfies worked harder, because they could. However as Patricks discovered, that wasn't in their opinion fast enough and so we had the MUA dispute in 1998. That was when the employers tried to bring in scab labour. They were shown the short end of the stick in no uncertain terms. We saw the Police join with the Wharfies to refute the lies that were being told by the employers and the Government of the day under John Howard.
Australia's ship unloading rate was the worst in the world. Our strike bound ports were a disgrace, even in wartime. Somebody should put up a statue to Chris Corrigan for changing that.
Brian Ross wrote

You can believe what you like - I know you will no matter what evidence is presented to you - but this book your quoting is based on the flimiest of evidence. Tsk. tsk.
But you haven't read the book and you won't read the book because you do not want to face the fact that your perfect left wing ideology is a sick illusion. And one section of your left wing support base stabbed their country in the back at the time of our nations greatest peril.
Brian Ross wrote

My own experience with unions has been generally good. I don't doubt you've never been a member of a union, right, Bogan. How unsurprising.
Wrong again. I was a member of the CEPU which was considered a "right wing" union and a responsible one. I often advised young tradesmen that they should join the CEPU for their own good. I didn't have any success. The unions are on the nose with most workers because of their disgusting behaviour during the 70's, which many older people like myself still remember. Even older people remember how the unions acted during wartime.
Brian Ross wrote

Having met Dr. Peter Stanley several times, I have a great deal more faith in his historical understanding than that of a fellow like Peter Bowen. Peter Stanley was the head historian at the War Memorial. He was also head historian at the Australian Museum. He has a great record of historical works behind him. Much more than Peter Bowen or Hal Colebatch.
Yes, I am sure he is part of your leftist, Australia and western hating bubble. I can not remember the details of his sacking from the Australian War Memorial, but I remember that some idiot was sacked for (among a lot of other PC things), for trying to rename the War Memorial the "Peace Memorial". And there was another furore over the Australian Museum. Among other things, it was discovered that the architectural design of the place was copied from a Jewish holocaust museum in Europe. This slyly suggested that Australian history was linked to genocide.

People with your leftist mindset routinely piss on my people, my civilisation, my people's superior culture, air brush our history to suite your left wing narrative, while your most ardent trade union supporters endangered the survival of OUR country during wartime with their incredibly selfish and irresponsible behaviour, and then you wonder why people like myself stopped being a leftie and became the left's arch enemy?

cods
Posts: 6433
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:52 am

Re: The Unions in Australia

Post by cods » Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:58 am

In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of the historical record. ... The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then provokes a revised history.



it sells books remember bri!

Juliar
Posts: 1355
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:56 am

Re: The Unions in Australia

Post by Juliar » Tue Jan 07, 2020 1:26 pm

The more interesting question is how much longer will the unions last ?

They have almost NO members anymore and would be bankrupt if they could not pilfer from members industrial super funds.

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: The Unions in Australia

Post by brian ross » Tue Jan 07, 2020 1:29 pm

cods wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:54 am
My own experience with unions has been generally good. I don't doubt you've never been a member of a union, right, Bogan. How unsurprising. :roll:
Nationalis
I have bri... and they did bugger all for me...oh wait a minute they did up my membership fees EVERY YEAR
Did you ever call on their services, Cods or did you just fork over your cash, no questions asked? :roll
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: The Unions in Australia

Post by brian ross » Tue Jan 07, 2020 1:37 pm

cods wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:58 am
In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of the historical record. ... The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then provokes a revised history.

it sells books remember bri!
Oh, I know that, Cods. However, it is how history is written. You however appear to believe it is something which should not be attempted because it is somehow "dirty" to question the status quo. Tsk, tsk. I have several books on historical revision. Unfortunately, most of them are neo-Nazis who are attempting to rewrite the history of the Holocaust. Peter Stanley has attempted to make Australians question what they know about history by presenting alternative evidence. He has done a good job in that regard. :Hi
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: The Unions in Australia

Post by Black Orchid » Tue Jan 07, 2020 2:17 pm

cods wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:58 am
In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of the historical record. ... The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then provokes a revised history.



it sells books remember bri!
Some people just love to change/interpret history to suit themselves and their own agendas and the moonbats lap it up like kool aid.

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: The Unions in Australia

Post by Neferti » Tue Jan 07, 2020 5:54 pm

brian ross wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2020 1:37 pm
cods wrote:
Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:58 am
In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of the historical record. ... The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then provokes a revised history.

it sells books remember bri!
Oh, I know that, Cods. However, it is how history is written. You however appear to believe it is something which should not be attempted because it is somehow "dirty" to question the status quo. Tsk, tsk. I have several books on historical revision. Unfortunately, most of them are neo-Nazis who are attempting to rewrite the history of the Holocaust. Peter Stanley has attempted to make Australians question what they know about history by presenting alternative evidence. He has done a good job in that regard. :Hi
Brian,
You have several books on history? I am amazed!

Have you done any research into YOUR FAMILY HISTORY? What did you find?

User avatar
Bogan
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:27 pm

Re: The Unions in Australia

Post by Bogan » Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:55 pm

Briney wrote

…...most of them are neo-Nazis who are attempting to rewrite the history of the Holocaust.
You have just made an implication which stereotyped neo Nazis as being unreliable and untruthful when writing history.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests