Australian Superannuation Sucks or does it

[IQS.RLOW]

A casual can still contribute to super, fuckwit

[Viking King.]

A casual can still contribute to super, fuckwit

Hey, back at ya fuckwit,
you are not reading proper again,
I said that Howhard had made it so the boss did not have to do the paperwork,
I did not say that the ability to contribute had been removed,
with not wanting to do paperwork and make the boss job easier, the boss chose to not do salary sacrifice,
that does not apply to all workplace but it does a great majority.
Why on earth would Howhard offer an equivilant dollar into a super fund if you did the same?
Because he knew that many bosses cut back on doing the employee salary sacrifice.
Since the greater majority of workers were unable to save $1500.00pa simply for the fact they were casuals and in and out of jobs, Howard know there whould be few handouts to that offer.

[IQS.RLOW]

You just go on supporting your crooked mates in your beloved ALP

I hope you get ripped off like the HSU workers did

You are a one eyed scumbag bottom feeder

[IQS.RLOW]

Oh, and I still see you are living in the past blaming a govt that hasn't been around for over 4 years

But that's nothing new for you...you always point backward and go wwwaaaaahhhh when your shitful ALP makes another mistake and adds to their long line of mistakes

[Viking King.]

Oh, and I still see you are living in the past blaming a govt that hasn't been around for over 4 years

But that's nothing new for you...you always point backward and go wwwaaaaahhhh when your shitful ALP makes another mistake and adds to their long line of mistakes

Isn't that what you do all the time?
Shit, that all Costello could say when in office,
a minister of Labor would ask a question and all he could say in response was,
"Ha ha ha, you held office for 11 yrs and couldn't do it ha ha ha"
he and all the others of the Lib party did the same, they could never answer why something was not being done
Now back to the subject;
Gov't is not responsable for the operations or losses in a superannuation fund, it is all up to the global markets,
so stop blaming gov't.

[Viking King.]

You just go on supporting your crooked mates in your beloved ALP

I hope you get ripped off like the HSU workers did

You are a one eyed scumbag bottom feeder

One eyed?
I look at all sides, whereas you and majority of your lib lovers only see good with the lib party.
As I gave mention some time ago, I was in politics with the Liberal party, found them to be such a ripp off to average Joe Worker I got out, but also, it is the same with any gov't in power, but more so with the Liberal party and the Nat party.

[IQS.RLOW]

The Liebor govt is responsible for forcing people to put 9% of their wage through their shonky union mates

That 9% would have been better off in a bank earning interest

[Viking King.]

The Liebor govt is responsible for forcing people to put 9% of their wage through their shonky union mates

That 9% would have been better off in a bank earning interest

So you are one that prefers the Average Joe worker to retire on nothing and complain they have to survive on a pension are you?
Scums like you who believe only rich people should have money and to buggery with the little guy who makes it for them
will rot in hell when the time comes.

[IQS.RLOW]

No, I prefer to be able to make my own savings decisions and unlike you, I don't need a govt to hold my hand

Maybe you need to get some big boy pull ups so you don't piss the bed at night thinking about how the govt can save you

[Viking King.]

No, I prefer to be able to make my own savings decisions and unlike you, I don't need a govt to hold my hand

Maybe you need to get some big boy pull ups so you don't piss the bed at night thinking about how the govt can save you

Fact one;
The money collected by the tax system is public money, including some of my own,
regardless of who is in power that public money should go back to helping the people,
yes, I agree that the idea of saving for a better ritirement (by Howard) was a good idea,
but it cannot be achieved when a people trying to find stable and secure employment and only gets casual work, having to do it all through a job agent, business and companies don't want you walking in the front door asking for work and leaving a resume, they say it clutters thier time and file cabinets, a person seeking employment must make application through the agents, 9 out of 10 times there is no reply to the application, only a yes or no, therefore the applicant has no idea of where they might be failing to obtain work, then when a person is constantly in casual work they have 100 different employer names in the resume and that say to the next employer, "Well this person can't keep a job for long, look at how many jobs they had in the past 12 months, not real secure"
And this was brought about by "Workplace agreements" by the Howard gov't.