Class action against Andrew Bolt successful

Discuss any News, Current Events, Crimes
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
punk

Re: Class action against Andrew Bolt successful

Post by punk » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:14 pm

mantra wrote:
punk wrote: i dont give a fuck, but thats how you cracker yahoo c unts post with a new bulletin all the time and dont read other peoples stuff u did post at yahoo, thats where lissa knows u from
You are so transparent punk - but as long as you're having fun.
i am now arsie's gone. he sent me this
Aussie wrote:This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=8&p=53515#p53515 .

Cut it out, IQ.
and this
Other users posting from this IP
IQS.RLOW 58
IQSRLOW 29
deepy 28
Guest 12
Tiffany 5
Curry Muncher 2
freeloader 2
Dovetail Joint 1
HBS Gay 1
Jovial Monk Forum
to stop me posting

Aussie

Re: Class action against Andrew Bolt successful

Post by Aussie » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:18 pm

Glad you kept that 'punk.'

Might give an insight into why some votes are ignored, wot?

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: Class action against Andrew Bolt successful

Post by mantra » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:22 pm

I think we've been through the Proxy IP exercise a few times. The numbers are similar if a few members post from the same server. Aussie's prepared quite a list there.

punk

Re: Class action against Andrew Bolt successful

Post by punk » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:24 pm

Aussie wrote:Glad you kept that 'punk.'

Might give an insight into why some votes are ignored, wot?
im all those members u mean or i post from the same proxy u mean? u c unts think every 1 is a sock if they use the same proxy but ur dead wrong because iq dt and cm havent been ignored in votes, ur all paranoid

Aussie

Re: Class action against Andrew Bolt successful

Post by Aussie » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:27 pm

mantra wrote:I think we've been through the Proxy IP exercise a few times. The numbers are similar if a few members post from the same server. Aussie's prepared quite a list there.
Again....you prove what an idiot you are. The software produces the list, and displays it to Admin.

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: Class action against Andrew Bolt successful

Post by mantra » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:34 pm

Aussie wrote:
mantra wrote:I think we've been through the Proxy IP exercise a few times. The numbers are similar if a few members post from the same server. Aussie's prepared quite a list there.
Again....you prove what an idiot you are. The software produces the list, and displays it to Admin.
You're the only idiot around here Aussie. Even with my limited ability I have more understanding of Proxy numbers than you do. You infer that half the members are posting from the same address. The software might display similar numbers, but the same proxy number can be used over and over again for different people. It doesn't mean they're all the same person.

Thanks for stuffing up this thread.

Aussie

Re: Class action against Andrew Bolt successful

Post by Aussie » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:40 pm

I have no problem at all 'stuffing up the Thread.' The issue was already opened in Politics, as you know.

Do you know the significance of this list, produced by the software.....not Admin?
IQS.RLOW 58
IQSRLOW 29
deepy 28
Guest 12
Tiffany 5
Curry Muncher 2
freeloader 2
Dovetail Joint 1
HBS Gay 1
Jovial Monk Forum
It has compared the IP used by punk with others who have posted from exactly the same IP. Means they celebrate Xmas in exactly the same post office box.

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: Class action against Andrew Bolt successful

Post by mantra » Wed Sep 28, 2011 5:57 pm

Aussie wrote:I have no problem at all 'stuffing up the Thread.' The issue was already opened in Politics, as you know.

Do you know the significance of this list, produced by the software.....not Admin?
IQS.RLOW 58
IQSRLOW 29
deepy 28
Guest 12
Tiffany 5
Curry Muncher 2
freeloader 2
Dovetail Joint 1
HBS Gay 1
Jovial Monk Forum
It has compared the IP used by punk with others who have posted from exactly the same IP. Means they celebrate Xmas in exactly the same post office box.
I think it's all irrelevant at the moment Aussie. It doesn't matter whether there are 20 socks here as long as they're not too disruptive. I don't believe IQ and punk are the same person. IQ creates a new nick when he's banned and uses it to post, but he doesn't hide his personality. When he's not banned and wants to be "mean" he doesn't use a sock to hide behind. Obviously others need socks to be mean.

Aussie

Re: Class action against Andrew Bolt successful

Post by Aussie » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:08 pm

You reckon IQ does not 'hide?'

He admits he can, and ergo, does. He boasts about that capacity...
......I have the ability to control myself if I so choose

User avatar
mantra
Posts: 9132
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am

Re: Class action against Andrew Bolt successful

Post by mantra » Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:16 pm

I have the ability to control myself if I so choose

I don't believe he was referring to socks when he posted that. If you're right Aussie then this forum has a person posting here who is suffering from a multiple personality disorder. You've listed 10 socks/puppets etc. on your list - how many more do you think there are? Ten..twenty...?

Perhaps you're right. I'm beginning to understand now why you only ended up with a few members.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests