The carbon tax

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
slimD

Re: The carbon tax

Post by slimD » Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:04 pm

Climate change... biggest con ever. I think the world has more pressing problems to deal with than a natural occurring event. try to change nature? Give me a break. We, the polluters are part of nature, and we will adapt. And one day we will not be here, as something else will inherit the earth, just as we did.
I just smell a rat, as climate policy has nothing to do with saving the planet. Ultimately its all about the cash. Some clever bastards are going to make a motza out of our gullibility.
Its cold tonight, and if i had an open fire, i'd be shovelling coal into it, just to say "fuck you".

The Artist formerly known as Sappho

Re: The carbon tax

Post by The Artist formerly known as Sappho » Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:27 pm

Aussie wrote:You still have not properly explained your 'punishment' allegation Coyote. The big polluters get taxed for shitting in and on our environment. Yes, they will pass that on to Mums and Dads, hence the various compensation proposals.
Public transport is not factored into the carbon compensation schedule. Nor should it be. Public transport is the cleanest form of transport.

I think it was wrong of the Gillard govt to not include petroleum products as part of the carbon levy.

Oh... by the way CO2 is not a pollutant. This is not a tax on pollution.

Aussie

Re: The carbon tax

Post by Aussie » Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:54 pm

Pedantic political semantics. Is the expression greenhouse gas acceptable? Yes it is, now, back to the point. This 'punishment' thaing. Please explain.

The Artist formerly known as Sappho

Re: The carbon tax

Post by The Artist formerly known as Sappho » Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:10 pm

Aussie wrote:Pedantic political semantics. Is the expression greenhouse gas acceptable? Yes it is, now, back to the point. This 'punishment' thaing. Please explain.
Too tired to care. Let's just call it a metaphorical punishment and move on to the business of petroleum products and the need to have them carbon taxed, particularly given that public transport costs are to rise because of the carbon tax.

Aussie

Re: The carbon tax

Post by Aussie » Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:33 pm

This is what you are too tired to care about. You said:
These people who are anything but the 'biggest polluters' are being punished for reducing their carbon footprint.....
When challenged by me, you want to move on and away from explaining that. Okay, fine.

:roll

Let's go to that Public Transport argument you want to push.

I have driven behind large diesel driven (public transport) School Busses, observed (and choked in) the shit coming out of the exhaust pipes. You must have experienced exactly the same thing. I have driven behind Cars (both diesel and petrol, gas driven) and seen nothing from the pipes.

So, Coyote, please explain.

The Artist formerly known as Sappho

Re: The carbon tax

Post by The Artist formerly known as Sappho » Thu Jul 21, 2011 7:17 pm

Aussie wrote:Let's go to that Public Transport argument you want to push.

I have driven behind large diesel driven (public transport) School Busses, observed (and choked in) the shit coming out of the exhaust pipes. You must have experienced exactly the same thing. I have driven behind Cars (both diesel and petrol, gas driven) and seen nothing from the pipes.

So, Coyote, please explain.
Are you trying to say that Public transport causes more CO2 per person than do cars per person?

Aussie

Re: The carbon tax

Post by Aussie » Thu Jul 21, 2011 7:28 pm


The Artist formerly known as Sappho

Re: The carbon tax

Post by The Artist formerly known as Sappho » Thu Jul 21, 2011 8:27 pm

Aussie wrote:Maybe.
Did you bother to check out that study to know what you are saying?

Go and find out for yourself... http://www.cato.org

Aussie

Re: The carbon tax

Post by Aussie » Thu Jul 21, 2011 8:33 pm

Are you trying to say that Public transport causes more CO2 per person than do cars per person?
Nah, I'm not 'trying' to say it. I am saying it.

The Artist formerly known as Sappho

Re: The carbon tax

Post by The Artist formerly known as Sappho » Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:20 am

Aussie wrote:
Are you trying to say that Public transport causes more CO2 per person than do cars per person?
Nah, I'm not 'trying' to say it. I am saying it.
Being mindful that my statement relates to Australia and not Washington, do you have any evidence to support your claim. I can't find any.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests