New Constitution

[Monkey Magic]

It is for THESE reasons I sent her ONE PM telling her she is on ignore and that I want nothing to do with her.

I make it my business to never be abusive and freaky in private messages because I view them as messages to the writer who exists as a real person and not the online persona who exists merely in a fantasy known as The Net. You obviously have lower, quite despicable standards.

Note won't you, I do not reply to your abusive freaky private message. You are filth in my eyes!

She just needs to get over the rejection .. and she will. It just takes time.

Does it pacify your anxiety when you transfer your issues onto others. "In psychotherapy, [transference is] the unconscious tendency to assign to others in one's present environment feelings and attitudes associated with significance in one's early life, especially the patient's transfer to the therapist of feelings and attitudes associated with a parent."

[annielaurie]

Why is this topic so wildly off topic?

[Jovial Monk]

Christ another would-be psychiatrist!

[Outlaw Yogi]

I'd love to tell you but I am having a problem with BTW WTF?

By the way, what the f*<(

[lisa jones]

Christ another would-be psychiatrist!

Monk .. I've got her on ignore. Why? She's freaking insane! And I sent her ONE PM telling her exactly that!

And I never read anything she posts anymore either! I told her that too in that ONE PM!

She'll eventually get it ..

[Monkey Magic]

Christ another would-be psychiatrist!

Monk .. I've got her on ignore. Why? She's freaking insane! And I sent her ONE PM telling her exactly that!

And I never read anything she posts anymore either! I told her that too in that ONE PM!

She'll eventually get it ..

Lest we forget... you sent one PM for the purpose of abusing the real person privately. Nasty.

[lisa jones]

Eventually being the operative word methinks ...

[Aussie]

Christ another would-be psychiatrist!

Monk .. I've got her on ignore. Why? She's freaking insane! And I sent her ONE PM telling her exactly that!

And I never read anything she posts anymore either! I told her that too in that ONE PM!

She'll eventually get it ..

Lest we forget... you sent one PM for the purpose of abusing the real person privately. Nasty.

I disagree with you there Sappho.

A reply to what *you post on Forum is for all to see.......a PM is for just *you to see.

In each case, the '*you' is a www character.

There is nothing about a PM which is more personally real life than what is posted in open. The only difference is that a PM is not seen by all. A PM is not directed at the real person using the typewriter. It is addressed the www person, as that the only persona www known.

You have that totally fucked up, and it explains a small part of history.

[Monkey Magic]

Why would a person want to abuse a persona privately, when it can be done and has been done publicly? Doesn't make sense.

[Aussie]

Why would a person want to abuse a persona privately, when it can be done and has been done publicly? Doesn't make sense.

Of course it makes sense. Just as one example......I may want to blast the shit out of *you publicly.......and then think....."hang on, maybe *Sappho has some other thing in mind I missed, but.......hey, I'll just ask *her privately, and thus not embarrass either of *us."

BTW, did *you make that distinction *you now seek to make when freediver contacted *you via PM to ask if *you would run as a candidate for election? Which *one was he addressing? *You or *you or *you?