Windsor and Oakeshott the brown-tongued toss-pots

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Windsor and Oakeshott the brown-tongued toss-pots

Post by mellie » Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:15 am

mellie wrote:Petty and inaccurate semantics wont dig Gillard out of her premature grave, so forget it.

"There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead"
Even Richard Farmer from the very left-leaning Crikey.com.au is appalled at the way Julia Gillard has gone back on what she said to the Australian people during the last federal election campaign.
http://maniraptor.posterous.com/there-w ... he-governm

Read this you blunt instrument,

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/ele ... r-her-govt
Busted....Ps, remnants of the transcript can still be found in googles cache, which links directly back to the page they pulled the August transcripts from.

http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Pages ... h=1/8/2010

Rudd was not leader of the party when Gillard made the statement on August 16 2010, Rudd won the 2007 election ...recall?

What are you, a stoner?
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Windsor and Oakeshott the brown-tongued toss-pots

Post by mellie » Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:17 am

Outlaw Yogi wrote:My apologies ...
A federal election was held on Saturday, 21 August 2010 for members of the 43rd
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian ... tion,_2010
Missed it completely while in the bush ... so that means Gillard got voted in, in her own right?
Well phuk me with a kyak paddle :oops:
I'll let you off because you apologised, ... 8-)

cheers
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU

Outlaw Yogi

Re: Windsor and Oakeshott the brown-tongued toss-pots

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:20 am

Yes I was wrong and yes I regularly smoke weed, but you still post heaps of $#!+. That's OK though, 'coz once I realise someone just posts junk, I don't bother finding out what they're babbling about, like JM for example.

Sappho

Re: Windsor and Oakeshott the brown-tongued toss-pots

Post by Sappho » Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:27 am

mellie wrote:
I'll let you off because you apologised, ... 8-)
Gee whizz... thanks smellie mummy. :roll:

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Windsor and Oakeshott the brown-tongued toss-pots

Post by mellie » Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:28 am

Furthermore, the 2010 election resulted in a hung parliament, so she had to bribe the independents to form a minority government without a mandate.

She won the election 'technically speaking' , but lost the campaign, and her primary vote (without greens preferences) was lower than the coalitions, meaning more people voted for a coalition government than Labor.

She bribed her way in, and has been shafting us ever since...my god, just how bad are they when they even went to the trouble to erase the month of August from their media centre database?

However, remnants of the transcript can still be found in googles cache, which links directly back to the page they pulled the August transcripts from.

http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Pages ... h=1/8/2010

The month of August 2010 vanished from the ministers media centre website where the transcripts are kept.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU

Outlaw Yogi

Re: Windsor and Oakeshott the brown-tongued toss-pots

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:30 pm

mellie wrote: She won the election 'technically speaking' , but lost the campaign, and her primary vote (without greens preferences) was lower than the coalitions, meaning more people voted for a coalition government than Labor.
That would be quite correct, but you failed to recognise more Ozzies vote Greens than Nationals.
So technically the ALP and Greens have formed a coalition government just like the Libs and Nats do.
The only real difference is the Nats attached themselves to the Libs because they're too pissant to stand alone, and the Greens remain separate from Labor because their intention is to eventually replace Labor.
If the Greens were as pitiful as the Nats they'd have accepted the Democrats offer of amalgamation.

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Windsor and Oakeshott the brown-tongued toss-pots

Post by mellie » Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:43 pm

Outlaw Yogi wrote:
mellie wrote: She won the election 'technically speaking' , but lost the campaign, and her primary vote (without greens preferences) was lower than the coalitions, meaning more people voted for a coalition government than Labor.
That would be quite correct, but you failed to recognise more Ozzies vote Greens than Nationals.
So technically the ALP and Greens have formed a coalition government just like the Libs and Nats do.
The only real difference is the Nats attached themselves to the Libs because they're too pissant to stand alone, and the Greens remain separate from Labor because their intention is to eventually replace Labor.
If the Greens were as pitiful as the Nats they'd have accepted the Democrats offer of amalgamation.
The Nats have some rising talent, in fact, i'd like to see Abbott ditch a couple of libs dregs, Turncoat to start with, (he's been going out with Oakeshott for dinner)...and hokey poky might need some compassionate leave also, golly gosh... *cringe* who was that woman?

Turnbull probably paid/blackmailed her to do it, that or spiked her glass of water in parliament or something... brain tumour? All Jokes aside, play times over, no more distractions, the whole lot of them need to grow up...has anyone thought to test Canberra's water supply?

Howard ran a tight ship, Abbott needs to start sealing his own decks, or else.

Labor are finished, will go back into stalemate for another 8 or so years, Greens will go back to being that loopy come dangerous little party we wont be in any mood to vote back into the senate next time round, besides, Bob Browns retiring, ....Turnbulls out for retribution, the deluded old fart thinks he's going to be Mr president one day i'm sure...I think he's looking rather unwell actually, he looks as though he's aged 10 years over night.
When Turncoat was leader of the Libs, he sat on the bench with his thumbs up his ass nodding obediently, this and gave Rudd the floor , re- ETS, and much of everything else.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU

Pastafarian
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:55 am

Re: Windsor and Oakeshott the brown-tongued toss-pots

Post by Pastafarian » Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:46 pm

mellie wrote:
Outlaw Yogi wrote:
mellie wrote: She won the election 'technically speaking' , but lost the campaign, and her primary vote (without greens preferences) was lower than the coalitions, meaning more people voted for a coalition government than Labor.
That would be quite correct, but you failed to recognise more Ozzies vote Greens than Nationals.
So technically the ALP and Greens have formed a coalition government just like the Libs and Nats do.
The only real difference is the Nats attached themselves to the Libs because they're too pissant to stand alone, and the Greens remain separate from Labor because their intention is to eventually replace Labor.
If the Greens were as pitiful as the Nats they'd have accepted the Democrats offer of amalgamation.
The Nats have some rising talent, in fact, i'd like to see Abbott ditch a couple of libs dregs, Turncoat to start with, (he's been going out with Oakeshott for dinner)...and hokey poky might need some compassionate leave also, golly gosh... *cringe* who was that woman?

Turnbull probably paid/blackmailed her to do it, that or spiked her glass of water in parliament or something... brain tumour? All Jokes aside, play times over, no more distractions, the whole lot of them need to grow up...has anyone thought to test Canberra's water supply?

Howard ran a tight ship, Abbott needs to start sealing his own decks, or else.

Labor are finished, will go back into stalemate for another 8 or so years, Greens will go back to being that loopy come dangerous little party we wont be in any mood to vote back into the senate next time round, besides, Bob Browns retiring, ....Turnbulls out for retribution, the deluded old fart thinks he's going to be Mr president one day i'm sure...I think he's looking rather unwell actually, he looks as though he's aged 10 years over night.
When Turncoat was leader of the Libs, he sat on the bench with his thumbs up his ass nodding obediently, this and gave Rudd the floor , re- ETS, and much of everything else.



Barnaby is rising talent?
The Mayans predicted the end of the world in December 2012, but they didn't see the Spanish coming

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Windsor and Oakeshott the brown-tongued toss-pots

Post by mellie » Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:55 pm

Libs and the Nats need to remain united, the democrats will destabilize both the Nats and Libs... I would however like to see Abbott bring more Nationals into his cabin they have always had the rough end of the stick and think for the Libs and our countries sake, they might have to start giving credit where it's due, and scoop up the Nat talent and get rid of their own handful of dregs.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU

mellie
Posts: 10859
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Windsor and Oakeshott the brown-tongued toss-pots

Post by mellie » Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:00 pm

Yes, I think Barnaby is indeed a rising talent, not a leader just yet, but definitely worthy of a spot in Abbott's cabinet.

The mans no dummy, if a tad bombastic at times, though he's toned down a fair bit, has matured and settled ...I think he's ready to be picked.

How about LIBNAT leadership, Barnaby would make a fine deputy leader.
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests