Burning The Book

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Burning The Book

Post by freediver » Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:15 pm

IQSRLOW wrote:
Hypocrisy involves a contradiction between what a person says and what they do
Precisely. It is what you are guilty of.
Only now you can't explain why it is hypocritical because because that takes away from your point....

User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Burning The Book

Post by IQSRLOW » Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:40 pm

No it doesn't.

Ned Kelly

Re: Burning The Book

Post by Ned Kelly » Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:40 pm

Nice dodge of this one, freediver:
Also, in your case freediver, it involves a contradiction in what you allow one day, and what you disallow the next. You are indeed the ultimate hypocrit.

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Burning The Book

Post by boxy » Sat Sep 11, 2010 7:57 pm

Ferombah Hynde wrote:I thought that inciting others to violence was a criminal offence.

Both the Moran and the Shmible explicitly instruct their followers to kill nonbelievers.

Why the fuck are these cunting books allowed to be sold? :evil:
Maybe they forgot to make the laws retroactive?
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

Dusty Trail

Re: Burning The Book

Post by Dusty Trail » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:27 pm

Is anyone here?

Ned Kelly

Re: Burning The Book

Post by Ned Kelly » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:49 pm

Dusty Trail wrote:Is anyone here?
Yeah, Dusty, I am always here. Wadda ya reckon about that QIT Brisbane lawyer bloke who smoked two fags in each case using a page (a) of the Bible and (b) of the Koran, as a 'scientific' experiment to evaluate which had the better effect?

He said what I have been saying. "It is just a fucking book" but the Media bleeped out the 'fucking.'

:D


Oh, and apparently according to the ABC, youtube have now removed it. Why? He made a very good point!

User avatar
HIGHERBEAM
Posts: 481
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:51 pm

Re: Burning The Book

Post by HIGHERBEAM » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:20 pm

YHWH The god of the early Israelites to be forever known as god.The twelve tribes of Israel rose up against their oppressors because of persecution.Is this what is going to happen when christians rise up against this crap that the muslims carry on about their beloved Koran.Why do the media beat up that the Koran is more important to muslims than the bible to christians.Is this a reverse discrimination of christian beliefs and is the media leading the charge by defacto.The muslims burn the bible and the american flag at any opportunity so why is it that we cant burn the Koran.True muslims would and should tolerate other religions but the media beat it up and the muslims play to the media.Rushdie had a fatwah put on him because he spoke and wrote the truth and the media beat it up and it spread like wildfire around the world.When the dust settled and the media lost interest the Fatwah was taken off. :mrgreen:
Will the Board survive under this Admin? Yes

Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes.
Confucius


ut operor nos ban monachus

User avatar
freediver
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:42 pm
Contact:

Re: Burning The Book

Post by freediver » Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:43 pm

IQSRLOW wrote:No it doesn't.
Here you go IQ - this is you trying to pretend that the real meaning of free speech is irrelevant to your point about free speech:
IQSRLOW wrote:

IQ, a person's right to express thoughts is not denied because one forum amongst many denies a certain number of those thoughts their expression, not at least whilst there are other forums where those thoughts can be freely expressed.
That is not my point. My point is to point out the hypocrisy in Freeloader censoring that with which he disagrees while he champions free speech.
Can you explain that one, or is it too 'beside the point' for you?

User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Re: Burning The Book

Post by IQSRLOW » Mon Sep 13, 2010 11:01 pm

So that you agree that you deny free speech in your forum while championing it just as long as it isn't in your forum.
You are all for free speech as long as you decide the caveats

Thank you for confirming your hypocrisy.

User avatar
Super Nova
Posts: 11788
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
Location: Overseas

Re: Burning The Book

Post by Super Nova » Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:30 pm

Ned Kelly wrote:
Dusty Trail wrote:Is anyone here?
Yeah, Dusty, I am always here. Wadda ya reckon about that QIT Brisbane lawyer bloke who smoked two fags in each case using a page (a) of the Bible and (b) of the Koran, as a 'scientific' experiment to evaluate which had the better effect?

He said what I have been saying. "It is just a fucking book" but the Media bleeped out the 'fucking.'

:D


Oh, and apparently according to the ABC, youtube have now removed it. Why? He made a very good point!
When I read that article I thought it was a pretty gutsy thing to do. He also had to claim it was not dope and got in trouble with the establishment.

Well it looks like the preacher in the US will get to live because he did not burn the Quoran. So now I learn that burn of the Quoran is the traditional way to dispose of an old version. What is different when you burn them on mass?

I agree..."it's just a *&^^% book".
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests