Proposed Rule regarding PMs
- Jim Lahey
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2021 5:55 pm
Re: Proposed Rule regarding PMs
Keep it here for entertainment LOL
-
- Posts: 3457
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:05 pm
Re: Proposed Rule regarding PMs
Works for me.Aussie wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 1:23 pmOkay, I have drafted this which I think represents what has been discussed above:
THE POSTING OF PERSONAL MESSAGES.
From this date and including this date (5th April, 2022) forward, personal messages CAN be posted by the recipient, absolutely. When you send a personal message, be well aware that the recipient CAN make its contents public including posting it in its entirety. Take responsibility for what you say. No more hiding behind some wall of alleged, and now false sense, of confidentiality. This is a Forum not a national security organization.
HOWEVER:
You may not post the content of any personal message received PRIOR to this date, 5th April, 2022 ABSOLUTELY, but with this one exception.
If a poster, Bill Blogs let’s call him, makes a post on Forum which contradicts what he has said to you in a personal message sent to you before this date, you MAY post that personal message. Bill Blogs may not hide behind any claim of confidentiality and then lie like a pig in shit on the same subject matter on forum, no matter what that subject matter is.
Thoughts/comments/suggestions?
- Super Nova
- Posts: 11786
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Re: Proposed Rule regarding PMs
Fine by me.J o h n S m i t h wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:39 pmWorks for me.Aussie wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 1:23 pmOkay, I have drafted this which I think represents what has been discussed above:
THE POSTING OF PERSONAL MESSAGES.
From this date and including this date (5th April, 2022) forward, personal messages CAN be posted by the recipient, absolutely. When you send a personal message, be well aware that the recipient CAN make its contents public including posting it in its entirety. Take responsibility for what you say. No more hiding behind some wall of alleged, and now false sense, of confidentiality. This is a Forum not a national security organization.
HOWEVER:
You may not post the content of any personal message received PRIOR to this date, 5th April, 2022 ABSOLUTELY, but with this one exception.
If a poster, Bill Blogs let’s call him, makes a post on Forum which contradicts what he has said to you in a personal message sent to you before this date, you MAY post that personal message. Bill Blogs may not hide behind any claim of confidentiality and then lie like a pig in shit on the same subject matter on forum, no matter what that subject matter is.
Thoughts/comments/suggestions?
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
- lisa jones
- Posts: 11228
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:06 pm
Re: Proposed Rule regarding PMs
Redneck wrote: ↑Mon Apr 04, 2022 2:22 pmTry and get stuffed,Jovial Monk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 04, 2022 2:12 pmTry and think before engaging mouth.
Not everything in PM is personal—forum details etc can be communicated via PM and are hardly personal.
PMs prior to the date of the rule must absolutely be protected.
if someone sends a PM that they want distributed to all and sundry why bother PMing it twit!
I would rather die than sell my heart and soul to an online forum Anti Christ like you Monk
- lisa jones
- Posts: 11228
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:06 pm
Re: Proposed Rule regarding PMs
Where did this happen? And when?
Post your evidence or GGF!
I would rather die than sell my heart and soul to an online forum Anti Christ like you Monk
- lisa jones
- Posts: 11228
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:06 pm
Re: Proposed Rule regarding PMs
So do I. I have yours and AiA's as a matter of fact.Super Nova wrote: ↑Mon Apr 04, 2022 4:38 pmDeleting PMs doesn't delete them from the recipient.
I have them all since the beginning of time.
I would rather die than sell my heart and soul to an online forum Anti Christ like you Monk
- lisa jones
- Posts: 11228
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:06 pm
Re: Proposed Rule regarding PMs
Looks like you've abandoned your post Drunk and Bobby is still a 'Mod' here...modding no one. Well he is modding himself.Jovial Monk wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:35 amNo, I am still a Mod.
Bobby will of course resign as Mod since he voted against me remaining a Mod—he cannot now work with me.
When will you resign as Mod, Bobby?
What a pathetic online wasteland you cyber junkie trolls have created.
Well done!
This site SHOULD close down. There's nothing left to salvage ... thanks to you unhinged arseholes.
I would rather die than sell my heart and soul to an online forum Anti Christ like you Monk
Re: Proposed Rule regarding PMs
Fuck off then.lisa jones wrote: ↑Fri Apr 22, 2022 9:23 pmLooks like you've abandoned your post Drunk and Bobby is still a 'Mod' here...modding no one. Well he is modding himself.Jovial Monk wrote: ↑Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:35 amNo, I am still a Mod.
Bobby will of course resign as Mod since he voted against me remaining a Mod—he cannot now work with me.
When will you resign as Mod, Bobby?
What a pathetic online wasteland you cyber junkie trolls have created.
Well done!
This site SHOULD close down. There's nothing left to salvage ... thanks to you unhinged arseholes.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests