New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Neferti » Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:10 pm

Serial Brain 9 wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 1:31 pm
:shock:

You just can’t make this stuff up - Give them an inch and they’ll take a mile

A political party of Transgender biological males self identifying as females has registered as the “women’s party” here in Australia.
Image
How about we get back to the ORIGINAL reason for posting? Which is:-

Transgender biological males self identifying as females has registered as the “women’s party” here in Australia

You lot who voted YES for Homosexuals to Marry, created this. It's all LEGAL now .... next we will have (names not disclosed) wanting to marry their dogs and Muslims wanting to have several wives. The LAW now says that is potentially LEGAL. Sue if you can find a LEGAL who will take you on, and I am sure there are plenty of those shysters out there.

User avatar
Valkie
Posts: 2662
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 4:07 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Valkie » Tue Feb 05, 2019 5:36 pm

Yep

We certainly opened the floodgates with that little gem.

But don't think the people actually voted for pooftah marriage.

It's all a fiddle
Had it been a legitimate vote, they woukd have been blown out of the water.
But that woukd have made life hard for the pollies, so they had to find a way to get this bullshite thing over the line.

I seriously doubt that the votes were actually counted.

Seriously, people would have smelled a rat had it been above 70%
So, a nice touchy feely 60 % plus, placate those that disagree into believing it was a close thing.
Had it been below 55%, tgere woukd have been calls for a re-count and possibly a real vote.
The pollies didn't want that, no way.

So, with a bit of under the counter, finger on the scales fiddling
They get to get the pooftahs off their backs and not upset the majority, because they had a chance.

Now we are seeing the result
Safe schools, grooming kids to be terminally twisted, but ripe for the gays to have fun.

Laws to make it illegal to discriminate against aids carrying queers.

Destruction of the family unit so queers of all sorts can get their rocks off, by consoling the kids and grooming them.

Soon it will be animal marriage, just like muzzos marrying goats.
Necrophilia being legalised, after all they are dead aren't they.

In time, they will work at getting the legal age dropped more and more.

Yep, the floodgates are open and all the shitty muck is flowing freely.
I have a dream
A world free from the plague of Islam
A world that has never known the horrors of the cult of death.
My hope is that in time, Islam will be nothing but a bad dream

sprintcyclist
Posts: 7007
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by sprintcyclist » Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:45 pm

Hey, if a 'womens party' was for women only ......... would that be sexist?
Right Wing is the Natural Progression.

User avatar
The Reboot
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 6:05 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by The Reboot » Tue Feb 05, 2019 8:27 pm

Neferti~ wrote:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:10 pm
Serial Brain 9 wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 1:31 pm
:shock:

You just can’t make this stuff up - Give them an inch and they’ll take a mile

A political party of Transgender biological males self identifying as females has registered as the “women’s party” here in Australia.
Image
How about we get back to the ORIGINAL reason for posting? Which is:-

Transgender biological males self identifying as females has registered as the “women’s party” here in Australia

You lot who voted YES for Homosexuals to Marry, created this. It's all LEGAL now .... next we will have (names not disclosed) wanting to marry their dogs and Muslims wanting to have several wives. The LAW now says that is potentially LEGAL. Sue if you can find a LEGAL who will take you on, and I am sure there are plenty of those shysters out there.
Agreed. It is pointless going back and forth with a demented old man child in any case.

All I can say is... the "evil patriarch" in charge of a progressive feminist party. The irony is delicious. :rofl
Valkie wrote:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 5:36 pm
Yep

We certainly opened the floodgates with that little gem.

But don't think the people actually voted for pooftah marriage.

It's all a fiddle
Had it been a legitimate vote, they woukd have been blown out of the water.
But that woukd have made life hard for the pollies, so they had to find a way to get this bullshite thing over the line.

I seriously doubt that the votes were actually counted.

Seriously, people would have smelled a rat had it been above 70%
So, a nice touchy feely 60 % plus, placate those that disagree into believing it was a close thing.
Had it been below 55%, tgere woukd have been calls for a re-count and possibly a real vote.
The pollies didn't want that, no way.

So, with a bit of under the counter, finger on the scales fiddling
They get to get the pooftahs off their backs and not upset the majority, because they had a chance.

Now we are seeing the result
Safe schools, grooming kids to be terminally twisted, but ripe for the gays to have fun.

Laws to make it illegal to discriminate against aids carrying queers.

Destruction of the family unit so queers of all sorts can get their rocks off, by consoling the kids and grooming them.

Soon it will be animal marriage, just like muzzos marrying goats.
Necrophilia being legalised, after all they are dead aren't they.

In time, they will work at getting the legal age dropped more and more.

Yep, the floodgates are open and all the shitty muck is flowing freely.
As a "pooftah queer" myself, I can assure you I do not condone kiddy fiddling and all these new "alternate" sexualities and genders.

I don't have AIDS either. That originated with gay and bisexual men. (Who can pass that on to a female, if so inclined. I "identify" as a woman both biologically and mentally, despite many "tomboyish" hobbies, etc).

https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/understanding- ... sexual-men

Interesting, the blacks are the most common to have AIDS.

I completely understand the angst towards these rainbow flag waving LGBTIQSELFISH as you call it. They even annoy me.

More important issues in the world than forcing a religious ceremony to appease the whiners, and "gender studies" in school.

What we need is education on how fucked up these communist governments are.

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by brian ross » Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:03 pm

Neferti~ wrote:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:10 pm
You lot who voted YES for Homosexuals to Marry, created this. It's all LEGAL now .... next we will have (names not disclosed) wanting to marry their dogs and Muslims wanting to have several wives. The LAW now says that is potentially LEGAL. Sue if you can find a LEGAL who will take you on, and I am sure there are plenty of those shysters out there.
Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Polygamy and Bestiality are still illegal and will remain illegal for some considerable time, Neferti. Your efforts at scare tactics, fail yet again. Tut, tut, not to worry, no big hairy transgender person is going to invade your home... :roll:
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
Serial Brain 9
Posts: 863
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2018 8:09 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Serial Brain 9 » Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:49 pm

Neferti~ wrote:
Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:10 pm
Serial Brain 9 wrote:
Thu Jan 31, 2019 1:31 pm
:shock:

You just can’t make this stuff up - Give them an inch and they’ll take a mile

A political party of Transgender biological males self identifying as females has registered as the “women’s party” here in Australia.
Image
How about we get back to the ORIGINAL reason for posting? Which is:-

Transgender biological males self identifying as females has registered as the “women’s party” here in Australia

You lot who voted YES for Homosexuals to Marry, created this. It's all LEGAL now .... next we will have (names not disclosed) wanting to marry their dogs and Muslims wanting to have several wives. The LAW now says that is potentially LEGAL. Sue if you can find a LEGAL who will take you on, and I am sure there are plenty of those shysters out there.
Im sure it'll be fine :shock:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Black Orchid » Wed Feb 06, 2019 3:00 pm

:shock:

User avatar
Valkie
Posts: 2662
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 4:07 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Valkie » Wed Feb 06, 2019 5:09 pm

When one disgusting perversion gets the green light

Other disgusting perversions will follow.

They they already working on reducing the legal age

Animal marriage will be just around the corner.

And looking at that picture of the rainbow pooftah
Simply proves exactly what I have been saying all along

It's got nothing to do with love or companionship
It's all about perverted lustful sexual deviates.

There is nothing right with LGBTIQSELFISH
I have a dream
A world free from the plague of Islam
A world that has never known the horrors of the cult of death.
My hope is that in time, Islam will be nothing but a bad dream

User avatar
Neferti
Posts: 18113
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Neferti » Wed Feb 06, 2019 5:15 pm

Brian probably thinks it would be wonderful if one of his kids marries The Family Dog ... or takes 3 wives, decides that they are a girl rather than a boy and wants to have "surgery".

Lotsa grandkids all Labor voters, I guess.

User avatar
Black Orchid
Posts: 25701
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 1:10 am

Re: New Political Party - “Woman’s Party”

Post by Black Orchid » Wed Feb 06, 2019 5:21 pm

I wouldn't call gay marriage a 'disgusting perversion'. If they want to marry I have no problem with that. I only have a problem with them insisting they be married in a church or suing a business for not wanting to bake a cake.

I know a few gay people and none of them wish to get married as such and all of them oppose these activists who are certainly not doing them any favours and most of these activists aren't even gay themselves. They are just a bunch of rent-a-crowd nothings who will only end up setting gay people back decades.

A bit like this wave of loony feminists we have today.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests